scholarly journals Mo1740 OPTICAL ENHANCEMENT AND PROBE CONFOCAL LASER ENDOMICROSCOPY CAN ACCURATELY PREDICT RESPONSE TO BIOLOGICAL THERAPY IN INFLAMMATORY BOWEL DISEASE PATIENTS

2020 ◽  
Vol 91 (6) ◽  
pp. AB476
Author(s):  
Marietta Iacucci ◽  
Olga Maria Nardone ◽  
Samuel C. Smith ◽  
Alina Bazarova ◽  
Rosanna Cannatelli ◽  
...  
2015 ◽  
Vol 2015 ◽  
pp. 1-10 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrea Michielan ◽  
Renata D’Incà

The pathogenesis of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is multifactorial with data suggesting the role of a disturbed interaction between the gut and the intestinal microbiota. A defective mucosal barrier may result in increased intestinal permeability which promotes the exposition to luminal content and triggers an immunological response that promotes intestinal inflammation. IBD patients display several defects in the many specialized components of mucosal barrier, from the mucus layer composition to the adhesion molecules that regulate paracellular permeability. These alterations may represent a primary dysfunction in Crohn’s disease, but they may also perpetuate chronic mucosal inflammation in ulcerative colitis. In clinical practice, several studies have documented that changes in intestinal permeability can predict IBD course. Functional tests, such as the sugar absorption tests or the novel imaging technique using confocal laser endomicroscopy, allow anin vivoassessment of gut barrier integrity. Antitumor necrosis factor-α(TNF-α) therapy reduces mucosal inflammation and restores intestinal permeability in IBD patients. Butyrate, zinc, and some probiotics also ameliorate mucosal barrier dysfunction but their use is still limited and further studies are needed before considering permeability manipulation as a therapeutic target in IBD.


2021 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christian Bojarski ◽  
Maximilian Waldner ◽  
Timo Rath ◽  
Sebastian Schürmann ◽  
Markus F. Neurath ◽  
...  

High-definition endoscopy is one essential step in the initial diagnosis of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) characterizing the extent and severity of inflammation, as well as discriminating ulcerative colitis (UC) from Crohn's disease (CD). Following general recommendations and national guidelines, individual risk stratification should define the appropriate surveillance strategy, biopsy protocol and frequency of endoscopies. Beside high-definition videoendoscopy the application of dyes applied via a spraying catheter is of additional diagnostic value with a higher detection rate of intraepithelial neoplasia (IEN). Virtual chromoendoscopy techniques (NBI, FICE, I-scan, BLI) should not be recommended as a single surveillance strategy in IBD, although newer data suggest a higher comparability to dye-based chromoendoscopy than previously assumed. First results of oral methylene blue formulation are promising for improving the acceptance rate of classical chromoendoscopy. Confocal laser endomicroscopy (CLE) is still an experimental but highly innovative endoscopic procedure with the potential to contribute to the detection of dysplastic lesions. Molecular endoscopy in IBD has taken application of CLE to a higher level and allows topical application of labeled probes, mainly antibodies, against specific target structures expressed in the tissue to predict response or failure to biological therapies. First pre-clinical and in vivo data from label-free multiphoton microscopy (MPM) are now available to characterize mucosal and submucosal inflammation on endoscopy in more detail. These new techniques now have opened the door to individualized and highly specific molecular imaging in IBD in the future and pave the path to personalized medicine approaches. The quality of evidence was stated according to the Oxford Center of evidence-based medicine (March 2009). For this review a Medline search up to January 2021 was performed using the words “inflammatory bowel disease,” “ulcerative colitis,” “crohn's disease,” “chromoendoscopy,” “high-definition endoscopy,” “confocal laser endomicroscopy,” “confocal laser microscopy,” “molecular imaging,” “multiphoton microscopy.”


Gut ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 61 (8) ◽  
pp. 1146-1153 ◽  
Author(s):  
R Kiesslich ◽  
C A Duckworth ◽  
D Moussata ◽  
A Gloeckner ◽  
L G Lim ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document