CORRIGENDA

Genetics ◽  
1996 ◽  
Vol 144 (3) ◽  
pp. 1329B-1329B
Keyword(s):  
Drosophila Melanogaster ◽  
Position Effect ◽  
Position Effect Variegation ◽  
Gene Encoding ◽  
Effect Variegation ◽  
Adenosylmethionine Synthetase

Abstract In the paper by J. Larsson, J. Zhang and A. Rasmuson-Lestander (Genetics  143:  887–896; June, 1996) entitled “Mutations in the Drosophila melanogaster gene encoding S-adenosylmethionine synthetase suppress position-effect variegation,” the word “synthetase” was omitted from the title.

scholarly journals Mutations in the Drosophila melanogaster Gene Encoding S-adenosylmethionine Suppress Position-Effect Variegation

Genetics ◽  
1996 ◽  
Vol 143 (2) ◽  
pp. 887-896 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jan Larsson ◽  
Jingpu Zhang ◽  
Åsa Rasmuson-Lestander
Keyword(s):  
Drosophila Melanogaster ◽  
Chromatin Structure ◽  
Position Effect ◽  
Regulatory Region ◽  
Polycomb Group ◽  
Position Effect Variegation ◽  
Gene Encoding ◽  
Sex Combs ◽  
S Alleles ◽  
Effect Variegation

Abstract In Drosophila melanogaster, the study of trans-acting modifier mutations of position-effect variegation and Polycomb group (Pc-G) genes have been useful tools to investigate genes involved in chromatin structure. We have cloned a modifier gene, Suppesssm of zeste 5 (Su(z)5), which encodes Sadenosylmethionine synthetase, and we present here molecular results and data concerning its expression in mutants and genetic interactions. The mutant alleles Su(z)5, l(2)R23 and l(2)M6 show suppression of wm4 and also of two white mutants induced by roo element insertions in the regulatory region i.e., wis (in combination with z  1) and wsp1. Two of the Su(z)S alleles, as well as a deletion of the gene, also act as enhancers of PoZycomb by increasing the size of sex combs on midleg. The results suggest that Su(z)5 is connected with regulation of chromatin structure. The enzyme Sadenosylmethionine synthetase is involved in the synthesis of Sadenosylmethionine, a methyl group donor and also, after decarboxylation, a propylamino group donor in the bio-synthesis of polyamines. Our results from HPLC analysis show that in ovaries from heterozygous Su(z)5 mutants the content of spermine is significantly reduced. Results presented here suggest that polyamines are an important molecule class in the regulation of chromatin structure.

scholarly journals Mutational Analysis of a Histone Deacetylase in Drosophila melanogaster: Missense Mutations Suppress Gene Silencing Associated With Position Effect Variegation

Genetics ◽  
2000 ◽  
Vol 154 (2) ◽  
pp. 657-668 ◽  
Author(s):  
Randy Mottus ◽  
Richard E Sobel ◽  
Thomas A Grigliatti
Keyword(s):  
Drosophila Melanogaster ◽  
Histone Deacetylase ◽  
Transcriptional Activity ◽  
Mutational Analysis ◽  
Position Effect ◽  
Transcriptional Regulator ◽  
Position Effect Variegation ◽  
Missense Mutations ◽  
Effect Variegation ◽  
New Mutations

Abstract For many years it has been noted that there is a correlation between acetylation of histones and an increase in transcriptional activity. One prediction, based on this correlation, is that hypomorphic or null mutations in histone deacetylase genes should lead to increased levels of histone acetylation and result in increased levels of transcription. It was therefore surprising when it was reported, in both yeast and fruit flies, that mutations that reduced or eliminated a histone deacetylase resulted in transcriptional silencing of genes subject to telomeric and heterochromatic position effect variegation (PEV). Here we report the first mutational analysis of a histone deacetylase in a multicellular eukaryote by examining six new mutations in HDAC1 of Drosophila melanogaster. We observed a suite of phenotypes accompanying the mutations consistent with the notion that HDAC1 acts as a global transcriptional regulator. However, in contrast to recent findings, here we report that specific missense mutations in the structural gene of HDAC1 suppress the silencing of genes subject to PEV. We propose that the missense mutations reported here are acting as antimorphic mutations that “poison” the deacetylase complex and propose a model that accounts for the various phenotypes associated with lesions in the deacetylase locus.

scholarly journals Competition Between Different Variegating Rearrangements for Limited Heterochromatic Factors in Drosophila melanogaster

Genetics ◽  
1997 ◽  
Vol 145 (4) ◽  
pp. 945-959
Author(s):  
Vett K Lloyd ◽  
Donald A Sinclair ◽  
Thomas A Grigliatti
Keyword(s):  
Drosophila Melanogaster ◽  
Chromosome Rearrangement ◽  
Position Effect ◽  
Position Effect Variegation ◽  
Euchromatic Region ◽  
Single Chromosome ◽  
Mosaic Expression ◽  
Effect Variegation ◽  
Protein Components

Position effect variegation (PEV) results from the juxtaposition of a euchromatic gene to heterochromatin. In its new position the gene is inactivated in some cells and not in others. This mosaic expression is consistent with variability in the spread of heterochromatin from cell to cell. As many components of heterochromatin are likely to be produced in limited amounts, the spread of heterochromatin into a normally euchromatic region should be accompanied by a concomitant loss or redistribution of the protein components from other heterochromatic regions. We have shown that this is the case by simultaneously monitoring variegation of a euchromatic and a heterochromatic gene associated with a single chromosome rearrangement. Secondly, if several heterochromatic regions of the genome share limited components of heterochromatin, then some variegating rearrangements should compete for these components. We have examined this hypothesis by testing flies with combinations of two or more different variegating rearrangements. Of the nine combinations of pairs of variegating rearrangements we studied, seven showed nonreciprocal interactions. These results imply that many components of heterochromatin are both shared and present in limited amounts and that they can transfer between chromosomal sites. Consequently, even nonvariegation portions of the genome will be disrupted by re-allocation of heterochromatic proteins associated with PEV. These results have implications for models of PEV.

The heterochromatin-associated protein HP-1 is an essential protein in Drosophila with dosage-dependent effects on position-effect variegation.

Genetics ◽  
1992 ◽  
Vol 131 (2) ◽  
pp. 345-352 ◽  
Author(s):  
J C Eissenberg ◽  
G D Morris ◽  
G Reuter ◽  
T Hartnett
Keyword(s):  
Germ Line ◽  
Position Effect ◽  
Inducible Promoter ◽  
Specific Protein ◽  
P Element ◽  
Position Effect Variegation ◽  
Chromosomal Protein ◽  
Gene Encoding ◽  
Position Effects ◽  
Effect Variegation

Abstract Chromosome rearrangements which place euchromatic genes adjacent to a heterochromatic breakpoint frequently result in gene repression (position-effect variegation). This repression is thought to reflect the spreading of a heterochromatic structure into neighboring euchromatin. Two allelic dominant suppressors of position-effect variegation were found to contain mutations within the gene encoding the heterochromatin-specific chromosomal protein HP-1. The site of mutation for each allele is given: one converts Lys169 into a nonsense (ochre) codon, while the other is a frameshift after Ser10. In flies heterozygous for one of the mutant alleles (Su(var)2-504), a truncated HP-1 protein was detectable by Western blot analysis. An HP-1 minigene, consisting of HP-1 cDNA under the control of an Hsp70 heat-inducible promoter, was transduced into flies by P element-mediated germ line transformation. Heat-shock driven expression of this minigene results in elevated HP-1 protein level and enhancement of position-effect variegation. Levels of variegating gene expression thus appear to depend upon the level of expression of a heterochromatin-specific protein. The implications of these observations for mechanism of heterochromatic position effects and heterochromatin function are discussed.

scholarly journals Modifiers of position-effect variegation in the region from 86C to 88B of the Drosophila melanogaster third chromosome

1987 ◽  
Vol 210 (3) ◽  
pp. 429-436 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. Reuter ◽  
J. Gausz ◽  
H. Gyurkovics ◽  
B. Friede ◽  
R. Bang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Drosophila Melanogaster ◽  
Position Effect ◽  
Position Effect Variegation ◽  
Effect Variegation
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document