Exact breakpoints of In(1)wm4 rearrangement

In(1)wm4 was known for decades as a classic example of position effect variegation-causing rearrangement and was mentioned in hundreds of publications. Nevertheless, the euchromatin breakpoint position of the rearrangement was not precisely localized. We performed nanopore sequencing of DNA from In(1)wm4 homozygous flies and determined the exact position of euchromatic (chrX:2767875) and heterochromatic breakpoints of the rearrangement.

Live Analysis of Position Effect Variegation Reveals Different Modes of Action for HP1 and Su(var)3-9

Position Effect Variegation (PEV) results from the juxtaposition of euchromatic and heterochromatic components of eukaryotic genomes, silencing genes near the new euchromatin/heterochromatin junctions. The degree of silencing is itself heritable through S-phase, giving rise to distinctive random patterns of cell clones expressing the genes intermixed with clones in which the genes are silenced. Much of what we know about epigenetic inheritance in the soma stems from work on PEV aimed at identifying the components of the silencing machinery and its mechanism of inheritance. Despite identifying two central gene activities - the Su(var)3-9 histone H3-Lysine-9 methyltransferase and the Su(var)205/HP1 methyl-H3-Lysine-9 binding protein - their role in PEV has been inferred from terminal phenotypes, leaving considerable gaps in understanding how PEV behaves through development. Here, we investigate the phenotypes of Su(var)3-9 and Su(var)205/HP1 mutations in live developing tissues. We discovered that mutations in Su(var)205/HP1 compromise the initial establishment of PEV in early embryogenesis. Later gains of heterochromatin-induced gene silencing are possible, but are unstable and lost rapidly. In contrast, mutations in Su(var)3-9 exhibit robust silencing early in development, but fail to maintain it through subsequent cell divisions. Our analyses show that while the terminal phenotypes of these mutations may appear identical, they have arrived at them through different developmental trajectories. We discuss how our findings further challenge existing models for epigenetic inheritance of heterochromatin-induced gene silencing.

Insertion of PATC-rich C. elegans introns into synthetic transgenes by golden-gate-based cloning

Transgenes are particularly prone to epigenetic silencing in the C. elegans germline. Here, we describe a protocol to insert introns containing a class of non-coding DNA named Periodic An/Tn Clusters (PATCs) into synthetic transgenes. PATCs can protect transgenes from position-dependent silencing (Position Effect Variegation, PEV) and from silencing in simple extra-chromosomal arrays. Using a set of simple design rules, it is possible to routinely insert up to three PATC-rich introns into a synthetic transgene in a single reaction.

The impact of genetic background and cell lineage on the level and pattern of gene expression in position effect variegation

Background Chromatin-based transcriptional silencing is often described as a stochastic process, largely because of the mosaic expression observed in position effect variegation (PEV), where a euchromatic reporter gene is silenced in some cells as a consequence of juxtaposition with heterochromatin. High levels of variation in PEV phenotypes are commonly observed in reporter stocks. To ascertain whether background mutations are the major contributors to this variation, we asked how much of the variation is determined by genetic variants segregating in the population, examining both the level and pattern of expression using the fruit fly, Drosophila melanogaster, as the model. Results Using selective breeding of a fourth chromosome PEV reporter line, 39C-12, we isolated two inbred lines exhibiting contrasting degrees of variegation (A1: low expression, D1: high expression). Within each inbred population, remarkable similarity is observed in the degree of variegation: 90% of the variation between the two inbred lines in the degree of silencing can be explained by genotype. Further analyses suggest that this result reflects the combined effect of multiple independent trans-acting loci. While the initial observations are based on a PEV phenotype scored in the fly eye (hsp70-white reporter), similar degrees of silencing were observed using a beta-gal reporter scored across the whole fly. Further, the pattern of variegation becomes almost identical within each inbred line; significant pigment enrichment in the same quadrant of the eye was found for both A1 and D1 lines despite different degrees of expression. Conclusions The results indicate that background genetic variants play the major role in determining the variable degrees of PEV commonly observed in laboratory stocks. Interestingly, not only does the degree of variegation become consistent in inbred lines, the patterns of variegation also appear similar. Combining these observations with the spreading model for local heterochromatin formation, we propose an augmented stochastic model to describe PEV in which the genetic background drives the overall level of silencing, working with the cell lineage-specific regulatory environment to determine the on/off probability at the reporter locus in each cell. This model acknowledges cell type-specific events in the context of broader genetic impacts on heterochromatin formation.

Monitoring of switches in heterochromatin-induced silencing shows incomplete establishment and developmental instabilities

Position effect variegation (PEV) in Drosophila results from new juxtapositions of euchromatic and heterochromatic chromosomal regions, and manifests as striking bimodal patterns of gene expression. The semirandom patterns of PEV, reflecting clonal relationships between cells, have been interpreted as gene-expression states that are set in development and thereafter maintained without change through subsequent cell divisions. The rate of instability of PEV is almost entirely unexplored beyond the final expression of the modified gene; thus the origin of the expressivity and patterns of PEV remain unexplained. Many properties of PEV are not predicted from currently accepted biochemical and theoretical models. In this work we investigate the time at which expressivity of silencing is set, and find that it is determined before heterochromatin exists. We employ a mathematical simulation and a corroborating experimental approach to monitor switching (i.e., gains and losses of silencing) through development. In contrast to current views, we find that gene silencing is incompletely set early in embryogenesis, but nevertheless is repeatedly lost and gained in individual cells throughout development. Our data support an alternative to locus-specific “epigenetic” silencing at variegating gene promoters that more fully accounts for the final patterns of PEV.

The Impact of Genetic Background and Cell Lineage on the Level and Pattern of Position Effect Variegation

BackgroundChromatin-based transcriptional silencing is often described as a stochastic process, largely because of the mosaic expression observed in position effect variegation (PEV), where a euchromatic reporter gene is juxtaposed with heterochromatin. Here we closely examine the impact of genetic background on PEV phenotypes in the fruit fly, Drosophila melanogaster.ResultsUsing consecutive generations of selective breeding, we isolated, from a single laboratory population, two inbred lines exhibiting contrasting degrees of variegation (A1: low expression, D1: high expression). Within each inbred population, remarkable similarity is observed in both the degree and the pattern of variegation. 89.63% of the differences between the two inbred lines in the degree of silencing can be explained by genotype, while a modest but significant sex effect is also observed. Further analyses of the PEV phenotype in the progeny of crosses between A1 and D1 suggest that the genotypic effect is the result of the combined effect of multiple independent trans-acting loci. While the initial observations are based on a PEV phenotype scored in the fly eye (hsp70-white reporter), similar degrees of silencing were observed using a beta-gal reporter that can be scored across the whole fly. The pattern of variegating hsp70-white expression among individual flies becomes almost identical after five generations of inbreeding. Using a reporter inserted into the heterochromatic fourth chromosome, image analysis found significant enrichment of pigmentation in the ventral-posterior quadrant in both the A1 and D1 lines, and in the F1 and F2 progeny produced from a cross between A1 and D1, despite different degrees of expression.ConclusionsCombining these results with the spreading model for local heterochromatin formation, we propose an augmented stochastic model to describe PEV. In this model, the genetic background, which determines the overall level of silencing, works with the cell lineage specific regulatory environment to determine the on/ off probability at the reporter locus in each cell. This model acknowledges cell-type specific events, as well as the general impact of heterochromatin formation.

Microwave influence on the position effect variegation in Drosophila melanogaster Meig.

Aim. The purpose of investigation was to study the effect of microwave irradiation of different intensity on the manifestation of the position effect variegation (PEV) in Drosophila melanogaster Meig. Methods. Experiments were carried out on mutant strain In(1)wm4, y. Microwave radiation with frequency 36.64 GHz and power density 0.01; 0.1 and 1 W/m2, was used. Exposure to microwaves was applied in early embryogenesis after 2-hour oviposition. Exposure time was 30 sec. PEV was examined in the irradiated and non-irradiated (control) flies. Results. In females, microwave irradiation at a power density of 1 W/m2 led to an enhance in the inactivation of the white+ gene transferred into a vicinity of pericentric heterochromatin in the X-chromosome. No effect was detected by irradiation intensity of 0.01 and 0.1 W/m2. In males, there was a suppression of genetic inactivation at a power density of 0.01 W/m2. Conclusions. Microwave irradiation can affect the size of heterochromatin blocks that cause gene silencing in PEV. The effect depends on the sex and intensity of the radiation. Keywords: Drosophila melanogaster Meig., position effect variegation, heterochromatin, gene silencing, non-ionising radiation.