scholarly journals What’s Race got to do With it? How Palliative Care Consultation may Mitigate Racial Disparities in Future Care

2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 877-877
Author(s):  
Lauren Starr ◽  
Connie Ulrich ◽  
G Adriana Perez ◽  
Subhash Aryal ◽  
Paul Junker ◽  
...  

Abstract It is unknown if care and cost outcomes differ by race and ethnicity following discharge from a hospitalization involving palliative care consultation to discuss goals-of-care (PCC). In this secondary analysis of 1,390 seriously-ill patients age 18+ alive at discharge who self-identified as Black, Hispanic, Asian, white, or other race and received PCC at an urban, academic medical center, we used binomial logistic regression and multiple linear regression controlling for demographic and clinical variables to identify factors associated with care experiences and costs following discharge from a hospitalization with PCC. In adjusted analyses, discharge to hospice was associated with Medicaid (p=0.016). Thirty-day readmission was associated with age 75+ (P=0.015), Medicaid (P=0.004), admission 30 days prior (P<0.0001), and Black race compared to white (P=0.016). Number of future days hospitalized was associated with Medicaid (P=0.001), admission 30 days prior (P=0.017), and Black race compared to white (P=0.012). Having any future hospitalization cost was associated with patient ages 65-74 (P=0.022) and 75+ (P=0.023), Medicaid (P=0.014), admission 30-days prior (P<0.0001), and Black race compared to white (P=0.021). Total future hospitalization costs were associated with female gender (P=0.025), Medicaid (P=0.009), admission 30 days prior (P=0.040), and Black race compared to white (P=0.037). Race or ethnicity was not a predictor of hospice enrollment. Randomized controlled trials are needed to understand if PCC is an intervention that reduces racial disparities in end-of-life care. Qualitative insights are needed to explain how PCC and socioeconomic factors such as Medicaid may mitigate future acute care use among racial and ethnic groups.

2011 ◽  
Vol 42 (5) ◽  
pp. 680-690 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sally A. Norton ◽  
Bethel Ann Powers ◽  
Madeline H. Schmitt ◽  
Maureen Metzger ◽  
Eileen Fairbanks ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 20 (4) ◽  
pp. 372-377 ◽  
Author(s):  
May Hua ◽  
Guohua Li ◽  
Caitlin Clancy ◽  
R. Sean Morrison ◽  
Hannah Wunsch

2021 ◽  
pp. 026921632110659
Author(s):  
Fangdi Sun ◽  
Raphaela Lipinsky DeGette ◽  
Elizabeth C Cummings ◽  
Lisa X Deng ◽  
Karen A Hauser ◽  
...  

Background: Advance care planning allows patients to share their preferences for medical care with the aim of ensuring goal-concordant care in times of serious illness. The morbidity and mortality of the COVID-19 pandemic has increased the importance and public visibility of advance care planning. However, little is known about the frequency and quality of advance care planning documentation during the pandemic. Aim: This study examined the frequency, quality, and predictors of advance care planning documentation among hospitalized medical patients with and without COVID-19. Design: This retrospective cohort analysis used multivariate logistic regression to identify factors associated with advance care planning documentation. Setting/participants: This study included all adult patients tested for COVID-19 and admitted to a tertiary medical center in San Francisco, CA during March 2020. Results: Among 262 patients, 31 (11.8%) tested positive and 231 (88.2%) tested negative for SARS-CoV-2. The rate of advance care planning documentation was 38.7% in patients with COVID-19 and 46.8% in patients without COVID-19 ( p = 0.45). Documentation consistently addressed code status (100% and 94.4% for COVID-positive and COVID-negative, respectively), but less often named a surrogate decision maker, discussed prognosis, or elaborated on other wishes for care. Palliative care consultation was associated with increased advance care planning documentation (OR: 6.93, p = 0.004). Conclusion: This study found low rates of advance care planning documentation for patients both with and without COVID-19 during an evolving global pandemic. Advance care planning documentation was associated with palliative care consultation, highlighting the importance of such consultation to ensure timely, patient-centered advance care planning.


2017 ◽  
Vol 13 (9) ◽  
pp. e703-e711 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexandre Buckley de Meritens ◽  
Benjamin Margolis ◽  
Craig Blinderman ◽  
Holly G. Prigerson ◽  
Paul K. Maciejewski ◽  
...  

Purpose: We sought to describe practice patterns, attitudes, and barriers to the integration of palliative care services by gynecologic oncologists. Methods: Members of the Society of Gynecologic Oncology were electronically surveyed regarding their practice of incorporating palliative care services and to identify barriers for consultation. Descriptive statistics were used, and two-sample z-tests of proportions were performed to compare responses to related questions. Results: Of the 145 respondents, 71% were attending physicians and 58% worked at an academic medical center. The vast majority (92%) had palliative care services available for consultation at their hospital; 48% thought that palliative care services were appropriately used, 51% thought they were underused, and 1% thought they were overused. Thirty percent of respondents thought that palliative care services should be incorporated at first recurrence, whereas 42% thought palliative care should be incorporated when prognosis for life expectancy is ≤ 6 months. Most participants (75%) responded that palliative care consultation is reasonable for symptom control at any stage of disease. Respondents were most likely to consult palliative care services for pain control (53%) and other symptoms (63%). Eighty-three percent of respondents thought that communicating prognosis is the primary team’s responsibility, whereas the responsibilities for pain and symptom control, resuscitation status, and goals of care discussions were split between the primary team only and both teams. The main barrier for consulting palliative care services was the concern that patients and families would feel abandoned by the primary oncologist (73%). Ninety-seven percent of respondents answered that palliative care services are useful to improve patient care. Conclusion: The majority of gynecologic oncologists perceived palliative care as a useful collaboration that is underused. Fear of perceived abandonment by the patient and family members was identified as a significant barrier to palliative care consult.


2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (8_suppl) ◽  
pp. 95-95
Author(s):  
Lisa Dimartino ◽  
Bryan J Weiner ◽  
Laura C Hanson ◽  
Morris Weinberger ◽  
Sarah Birken ◽  
...  

95 Background: Studies show palliative care (PC) delivered concurrently with cancer treatment improves outcomes, yet integration of PC with inpatient oncology is lacking. A promising approach to improve integration is a triggered palliative care consultation (TPCC), which is primarily based on clinical criteria (e.g. metastatic disease) and may include multiple strategies to support its use. This study evaluated the impact of two TPCC approaches on PC consult implementation (uptake and timeliness) in the solid tumor medical (MED) and gynecologic oncology (GYN) services at an academic medical center. Methods: MED TPCC used multiple strategies (chart review to identify eligible patients, training, clinician prompting); GYN TPCC used a single strategy (written guideline of clinical criteria for initiating a consult). PC consult information was obtained from medical charts and linked to all hospital encounter data for MED and GYN. The timeframe was 2010-2016 with TPCC onset in 2014 (GYN) and 2015 (MED). We compared PC consult implementation in GYN (single strategy) vs no strategy and MED (multiple strategies) vs GYN (single strategy). Difference-in-differences and modified Poisson regression was used to evaluate whether PC consult implementation differed after initiating strategies, adjusting for patient demographic and clinical characteristics. Results: Our sample included 5,873 MED and 3,889 GYN hospitalizations. Overall 8.8% of MED and 11.0% of GYN hospitalizations involved a PC consult. In regression analyses, use of a single strategy was associated with increased PC consult uptake vs no strategy (aRR: 1.45, p < .05), while use of multiple strategies was associated with increased PC consult uptake vs use of a single strategy (aRR: 2.34, p < .001). Across all comparisons, the strategies did not significantly impact PC consult timeliness. Conclusions: This study compared PC consult implementation across two inpatient oncology services and found a TPCC approach supported by multiple strategies had the greatest impact on uptake. Questions remain regarding which TPCC approach can most effectively achieve sustainability of uptake and PC consult timeliness in inpatient settings.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document