scholarly journals State Medicaid Policy and LTC: A Multi-State Qualitative Study of Policy Influence on Caregiver Experiences

2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 105-105
Author(s):  
Tonie Sadler ◽  
Kevin Yan ◽  
Daniel Brauner ◽  
Harold Pollack ◽  
R Tamara Konetzka

Abstract This study focuses on long-term care (LTC) state Medicaid policy and its impact on caregiver decisions and experiences. It examines respondents’ general knowledge of LTC state policies and services, challenges with navigating LTC policies and services, and decision-making pathways based on these factors. Using purposive sampling, 63 family caregivers across eight states participated in open-ended qualitative interviews (2019-2020) until thematic saturation was reached. Questions broadly examined caregivers’ experiences and decisions, focusing on decisions made around type of care setting and experiences with LTC state policy. States were selected to represent variation in Home and Community Based Service (HCBS) expenditures as a percentage of total Medicaid long-term services and support expenditures. While LTC policies and services vary significantly by state, we identified many parallels in caregiver experiences and perceptions across states, as respondents often lacked specific knowledge about LTC policies and services and how to access them. Overarching themes include LTC policy navigation challenges, distrust in state-funded LTC services and supports, and moral expectations of caregiving. To manage these challenges, caregivers employed coping strategies such utilizing informal support networks, hiring care coordination assistance, and “stretching things thin” to fill the policy and service gaps. Study findings highlight potential strategies to improve LTC services across states. There is a need to improve community trust with state services by employing transparent regulatory and evaluation procedures for LTC. Wider access to case management may improve communication and knowledge of available services to maximize benefit from HCBS expansions.

2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 440-440
Author(s):  
Tonie Sadler ◽  
Kevin Yan ◽  
Daniel Brauner ◽  
Harold Pollack ◽  
R Tamara Konetzka

Abstract COVID-19 poses unique challenges to family caregivers. This study explores how family caregivers for older adults with cognitive impairments experience and make decisions about caregiving during a global pandemic. Using purposive sampling, 63 family caregivers across eight states participated in open-ended qualitative interviews (2019-2020), until thematic saturation was reached. Questions broadly examined caregivers’ experiences and decisions, focusing on decisions made around type of care setting. Questions about responses to the Pandemic were added as events unfolded. States were selected to represent variation in Home and Community Based Service (HCBS) expenditures as a percentage of total Medicaid long-term services and supports expenditures. Family caregivers experienced significant concern about COVID-19 itself, and about the indirect consequences of caregiving caused by the pandemic. Caregivers also displayed flexibility and adaptability in ceasing selected services, contingently continuing services, and utilizing telemedicine and other remote healthcare interventions to protect their loved ones. Many family caregivers utilized remote health care tools such telemedicine, no-contact prescription and grocery delivery. Such measures improved service access and reduced caregiver workload. Given the persistent challenges posed by COVID-19, long-term service organizations have an opportunity to enhance their policies to meet the needs of caregivers and those they care for. There is a need to expand telemedicine and other remote healthcare tools, while adapting these technologies to the needs of families. Also, procedures are needed for safe pathways to utilize HCBS and nursing care during a pandemic including communication supports, sufficient PPE, increased staffing, and utilization of evidence-based protocols.


2020 ◽  
pp. 073346482092451
Author(s):  
Esther M. Friedman ◽  
Regina A. Shih ◽  
Sangeeta C. Ahluwalia ◽  
Virginia I. Kotzias ◽  
Jessica L. Phillips ◽  
...  

Older adults in need of assistance often prefer to remain at home rather than receive care in an institution. To meet these preferences, Medicaid invited states to apply for the Balancing Incentive Program (BIP), a program intended to “rebalance” Medicaid-financed long-term services and supports to Home- and Community-Based Services (HCBS). However, only about half of eligible states applied. We interviewed Medicaid administrators to explore why some states applied for BIP whereas others did not. Supportive state leadership and the presence of other programs supporting community-based care were positively related to BIP application. Opposing policy priorities and programs competing for similar resources were negatively related to BIP application. Because states most likely to apply already had policy goals and programs supporting HCBS, BIP may inadvertently widen disparities across states, pushing those on the margins ahead and leaving the ones that are worst off in HCBS support to fall even further behind.


2021 ◽  
Vol 29 (3) ◽  
pp. 746-755
Author(s):  
Eva Maria Gruber ◽  
Silvana Zeiser ◽  
Dorit Schröder ◽  
Andreas Büscher

2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 602-603
Author(s):  
Rachael Spalding ◽  
Emma Katz ◽  
Barry Edelstein

Abstract Most older adults living in long-term care settings (LTCs) indicate that expressing their sexuality is important to them (Doll, 2013). Little is known about the general public’s attitudes towards sexual behaviors in LTCs. Attitudes of LTC residents’ family members are particularly important, as family members are most likely to visit residents and to care about their quality of life. Family members’ attitudes could in turn inform facility policies and management. We will present preliminary data from a series of qualitative interviews with community-dwelling adults regarding their attitudes. We will discuss how these data are being used to inform current work on a measure of attitudes toward sexual behavior in LTCs.


2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 690-691
Author(s):  
Samara Scheckler

Abstract The house acts as both an environment of care and a vehicle to financially potentiate long-term community-based support. While housing can empower a diverse set of options for a person-centered aging process, inadequate housing can also impede healthy aging in the community. This symposium teases out the nodes where housing acts to benefit or limit safe community-based aging. The first paper in this symposium, Homeownership Among Older Adults, describes typologies of older adult homeownership and sensitively highlights trends, disparities and important considerations of homeownership in later life. The next two papers take these older adults and explores situations where their housing acts as an asset or as a burden. Identifying Cost Burdened Older Adults acknowledges that housing cost burdens look different for older adults than younger cohorts. A more precise definition of older adult housing cost burden is proposed to help researchers and policymakers better synthesize the complex relationships between older adult housing and their long-term care decisions. The Long-Term Care Financing Challenge then explores the role of home equity in expanding the community-based long-term care choice set for older adults. This paper demonstrates benefits (both realized and unrealized) in home equity and suggests policy implications moving forward. Finally, Cardiometabolic Risk Among Older Renters and Homeowners disentangles the relationship between housing and health by demonstrating health disparities that are associated with housing tenure, conditions and affordability. Taken together, this symposium explores the complex and multidirectional relationships between housing, long-term care and older adult health.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document