24. Personal bankruptcy

Author(s):  
J. Scott Slorach ◽  
Jason Ellis

The partner or sole trader may be made bankrupt if his liabilities exceed his assets or if he has insufficient liquid assets to pay his current liabilities even if the value of his total assets exceeds the value of his total liabilities. The law of bankruptcy is mostly contained in the Enterprise Act (EA) 2002. This chapter discusses the bankruptcy procedure; the trustee in bankruptcy; effect of the bankruptcy order on the bankrupt personally; assets in the bankrupt’s estate; distribution of the bankrupt’s assets; duration of the bankruptcy and discharge of the bankrupt; fast track voluntary arrangement scheme; and individual voluntary arrangement.

Author(s):  
J. Scott Slorach ◽  
Jason Ellis

The partner or sole trader may be made bankrupt if his liabilities exceed his assets or if he has insufficient liquid assets to pay his current liabilities even if the value of his total assets exceeds the value of his total liabilities. The law of bankruptcy is mostly contained in the Enterprise Act (EA) 2002. This chapter discusses the bankruptcy procedure; the trustee in bankruptcy; effect of the bankruptcy order on the bankrupt personally; assets in the bankrupt’s estate; distribution of the bankrupt’s assets; duration of the bankruptcy and discharge of the bankrupt; fast track voluntary arrangement scheme; and individual voluntary arrangement.


Business Law ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 237-248
Author(s):  
J. Scott Slorach ◽  
Jason Ellis

The partner or sole trader may be made bankrupt if his liabilities exceed his assets or if he has insufficient liquid assets to pay his current liabilities, even if the value of his total assets exceeds the value of his total liabilities. The law of bankruptcy is mostly contained in the Enterprise Act (EA) 2002. This chapter discusses the bankruptcy procedure; the trustee in bankruptcy; effect of the bankruptcy order on the bankrupt personally; assets in the bankrupt’s estate; distribution of the bankrupt’s assets; duration of the bankruptcy and discharge of the bankrupt; fast track voluntary arrangement scheme; and individual voluntary arrangement.


2020 ◽  
pp. 237-248
Author(s):  
J. Scott Slorach ◽  
Jason Ellis

The partner or sole trader may be made bankrupt if his liabilities exceed his assets or if he has insufficient liquid assets to pay his current liabilities, even if the value of his total assets exceeds the value of his total liabilities. The law of bankruptcy is mostly contained in the Enterprise Act (EA) 2002. This chapter discusses the bankruptcy procedure; the trustee in bankruptcy; effect of the bankruptcy order on the bankrupt personally; assets in the bankrupt’s estate; distribution of the bankrupt’s assets; duration of the bankruptcy and discharge of the bankrupt; fast track voluntary arrangement scheme; and individual voluntary arrangement.


2019 ◽  
pp. 239-250
Author(s):  
J. Scott Slorach ◽  
Jason Ellis

The partner or sole trader may be made bankrupt if his liabilities exceed his assets or if he has insufficient liquid assets to pay his current liabilities even if the value of his total assets exceeds the value of his total liabilities. The law of bankruptcy is mostly contained in the Enterprise Act (EA) 2002. This chapter discusses the bankruptcy procedure; the trustee in bankruptcy; effect of the bankruptcy order on the bankrupt personally; assets in the bankrupt’s estate; distribution of the bankrupt’s assets; duration of the bankruptcy and discharge of the bankrupt; fast track voluntary arrangement scheme; and individual voluntary arrangement.


2000 ◽  
Vol 29 (1) ◽  
pp. 255-286 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hung‐Jen Wang ◽  
Michelle J. White

2020 ◽  
pp. 259-264
Author(s):  
В. В. Дутка

The relevance of the article is that society’s attitude to the bankruptcy procedure is ambiguous: ordinary citizens who have never been involved in bankruptcy proceedings often perceive it as a certain negative phenomenon that should be avoided and avoided. On the other hand, for many debtors, bankruptcy becomes the “lifeline” with which they can repay their claims to creditors and start financial life “from scratch”. At the same time, it should be noted that many debtors and creditors use the bankruptcy procedure not for the purposes provided by the legislator in the relevant legal norms, but to satisfy only their own interests, to the detriment of the interests of other parties to the case. In this regard, the study of the abuse of the right to initiate bankruptcy proceedings becomes relevant. The article is devoted to the study of abuse of the right to initiate bankruptcy proceedings. The purpose of the article is to study the abuse of the right to initiate bankruptcy proceedings and highlight the author’s vision of this issue. According to the results of the study, the author concludes that the application to the debtor of bankruptcy procedures can be both good for the debtor and to the detriment of the interests of his creditors. Entities that could potentially abuse the right to initiate bankruptcy proceedings are: creditors of the debtor – a legal entity, as well as debtors – legal entities, individuals and individuals – entrepreneurs. The fact of exemption of debtors from the court fee for filing an application to initiate bankruptcy proceedings is not only an unjustified luxury for our state, but also only contributes to the abuse of the right to initiate bankruptcy proceedings by unscrupulous debtors. In order to reduce the number of cases of abuse of the right to initiate bankruptcy proceedings, the author justifies the need to complicate the conditions for opening bankruptcy proceedings, for example, by returning the conditions provided by the Law of Ukraine “On Restoration of Debtor’s Solvency or Recognition of Debtor’s Bankruptcy”.


Author(s):  
Aleksandra Višekruna

Opening of bankruptcy procedure causes numerous consequences that affect the debtor in insolvency and all the persons connected with it. Since employees have the strongest bond with their employer - debtor, special treatment is given to the effect of insolvency on labor contracts. Faith of these contracts in bankruptcy procedure depends upon many factors, but nowadays in majority of countries commencement of bankruptcy does not necessarily mean automatic termination of employment. Since Serbian law has known, during the course of history, both approaches, in this paper we have addressed both of them, and we have pointed out numerous dilemmas that had risen due to imprecise norms. The current Law has accepted more modern concept and sees bankruptcy as a reason for dismissal. However, the Law has not resolved numerous issues that give rise to different interpretations.


2020 ◽  
pp. 27-33
Author(s):  
R.B. Poliakov

The article is devoted to the formation and development of the competitive process in independent Ukraine, namely in the 90s of the twentieth century, during its economic downturn. The normative legal acts of that period, which regulated the insolvency relations and the corresponding Explanations of the Supreme Arbitration Court of Ukraine, are studied. It is emphasized that the first act of the competitive process of independent Ukraine — the Bankruptcy Law at 1992, proved to be very simple to solve the problems of insolvency of large industrial enterprises. The author accentuates that this law in its essence resembled the competitive process of the XIX century, where there was only a liquidation procedure. The lack of a full-fledged financial recovery procedure, traditional measures of the bankruptcy process, a professional arbitration manager and legal deadlines for the regulation of bankruptcy proceedings led to litigation and unjustified liquidation of strategic industrial enterprises for the state. It is argued that the purpose of the Explanations of the Supreme Arbitration Court of Ukraine dated 18.11.1998 was to increase the efficiency of the law itself, mitigate the negative consequences of its application, resolve problems of simultaneous settlement of commercial disputes in litigation with consideration of monetary claims of creditors in bankruptcy proceedings. The important points of this Clarification are emphasized concerning the application of procedural norms, the legal status of the participants in the case, the structure and content of the application for initiating bankruptcy proceedings, the functions of the court, the work of the liquidation commission, etc. It is noted that the Clarification not only facilitated the work of arbitration courts and participants in the bankruptcy proceedings, but also allowed to properly understand the essence of the bankruptcy process itself, previously unknown to the legal science of Ukraine. It is argued that the Bankruptcy Law at 1999 was of revolutionary significance for the development of the bankruptcy process in Ukraine. He significantly intensified the activities of arbitration courts. Significantly increased the number of bankruptcy cases initiated by debtors, including large industrial enterprises. In many cases, the courts began to apply reorganization and amicable agreement procedures. There are differences between the Bankruptcy Laws at 1992 and 1999, in particular in their direction. As a result of the study, the author concludes that the benefits provided by the Bankruptcy Law of 1999 could be used by debtors in respect of whom cases were initiated under the "old" version of the Law. The activities of arbitration managers allowed to maximize the efficiency of the bankruptcy procedure in terms of financial recovery of debtors and repayment of creditors’ claims.


2017 ◽  
Vol 1 (3) ◽  
pp. 160-167
Author(s):  
Tatiana Kareva ◽  
Vadim Sonin

The subject of the article is the legal and practical problems of cross-border personal bankruptcyin Russia and China.The main goal of this work is to analyze the major issues and obstacles in recognition andenforcement of Russian individual bankruptcy decisions in China and introduce it to Russianscholars and legal professionals.The methodological basis is analysis of the Russian and Chinese legislation, judicial practiceand special literatureThe results, scope of application. This article discusses the possibility of applying the provisionsof the Federal Law On Insolvency (Bankruptcy) to the Chinese nationals registered asindividual entrepreneurs in Russia. The article also reviews the Chinese legal regulation andoffers recommendations on execution of the court judgments on bankruptcy and collectionof debts from the PRC nationals. Existing Russian legislation allows to recognize the foreignnationals as bankrupts. The provisions on the cross-border insolvency also apply to them.The bankruptcy in China is not applied currently to the individuals, although theoretically itmay affect their property sphere during the bankruptcy of an individual private enterprise.Conclusions. The cross-border insolvency of the Chinese nationals encounters obstacles on threelevels. Firstly, the awards of the Russian arbitration courts have not been practically enforced inPRC due to inadequate notification of the Chinese party in the case. Secondly, Chinese courts inprinciple are extremely reluctant in recognizing foreign judgments on bankruptcy, such cases areexceptional. Thirdly, there is no personal bankruptcy institution in the PRC, while similar procedureslike bankruptcy of individual private enterprises are not applied in reality, and there are nolegislative prospects for the personal bankruptcy in the nearest future. Therefore, when conductingthe bankruptcy procedure for the Chinese nationals on the Russian territory, one can onlycount on their property located on this side of the border.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document