Die Freiheit der Presse im Nationalsozialistischen Staat. Ein Wort an das Ausland and Freedom of the Press in the National-Socialist State

1934 ◽  
2019 ◽  
pp. 108-137
Author(s):  
O. I. Kiyanskaya ◽  
D. M. Feldman

The analysis is focused on the pragmatics of V. Lenin’s articles ‘Party Organization and Party Literature’ [‘Partiynaya organizatsia i partiynaya literatura’] (1905) and ‘How to Ensure Success of the Constituent Assembly (on freedom of the press)’ [‘Kak obespechit uspekh Uchreditelnogo sobraniya (o svobode pechati)’] (1917). Foreign and Russian scholars alike considered the two works as components of the concept of Socialist state literature and journalism, conceived before the Soviet era. Based on examination of the political context, this work proves that Lenin was driven to write the articles by his fight for leadership in RSDRP. In 1905, Lenin obtained control over Novaya Zhizn, the newspaper under M. Gorky’s editorship, and insisted that opponents had to follow his censorship guidelines: the press had to become a propaganda tool rather than a source of income. Twelve years on, Lenin’s principles still reigned. 


Author(s):  
Jan Nelis

The National Socialist State represented itself by means of vast publicbuildings, executed in a stripped neoclassical style, thus linking the ThirdReich directly with Antiquity and a more recent German past (1750-1850). Hitler, who showed much interest in art and especially in architecture,wanted his Reich, which he came to see as a sort of myth, to look monumentaland timeless. The buildings would symbolize the power of the newregime. They were the scene and background of public life and were usedto mobilize the German masses into a solid nation. A new political culture,an ersatz religion, was created, and a cult to go with it. Polities, aesthetics,religion, ... all became one dramatic whole.


2021 ◽  
Vol 45 ◽  
pp. 143-159
Author(s):  
Maria Luiza Tucci Carneiro

This article aims to sensitize our reader to the issue of forced migrations by Nazi violence that, from 1933 onwards, had consequences beyond Europe, including several countries in Latin America. Persecuted, frightened and humiliated by the national socialist state and collaborationist countries, the Jew had nowhere to go, as not all nations expressed the desire to adopt him as a citizen, as a human being bearing his own name and roots. Among those who chose Brazil as a refuge, temporary or permanent, we identified hundreds of artists, writers and scientists who turned their works into libels against intolerance. Through the artistic and literary production of this group, we intend to assess their perceptions of Europe destroyed by Nazi barbarism, interpret their traumas, their visions of “abysses” in the context of chaos and the meaning of life in the face of possible death


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document