ADHESIONS ARE NOT ALWAYS THE ENEMY: POUCH VOLVULUS

2021 ◽  
Vol 27 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S42-S42
Author(s):  
Beatrice Dionigi ◽  
Olga Lavaryk ◽  
Stefan Holubar ◽  
Amy Lightner ◽  
Tracy Hull

Abstract Introduction Proctocolectomy with ileal pouch anal anastomosis (IPAA) was introduced over 40 years ago, prior to the era of laparoscopy. Since then, minimally invasive surgery (MIS) techniques have been applied to pelvic pouch surgery. One advantage of MIS is the reduction in adhesion-related complications. However, the lack of adhesions may result in a different set of complications. Specifically, when the pouch is not adherent in the pelvis, pouch volvulus can occur around the mesenteric axis. The aim of this study was to describe our experience with pelvic pouch volvulus. Methods Our prospectively maintained pelvic pouch registry and our enterprise wide electronic medical record were queried for keyword combinations of “pouch volvulus” between 1994 and 2020. Pouch volvulus was defined as torsion of the ileal pouch on its own mesenteric axis or around small bowel while maintaining the proper orientation of the ileo-anal anastomosis. Patients with pouches constructed with twisted mesenteric axis from ill-aligned anastomoses were excluded. Data for these patients was collected from the pouch registry and additional chart review. Results We identified 17 patients with pouch volvulus; of these, 11 patients did not meet our selection criteria and were excluded. Of the 6 patients (5 female; median age 25 range 20–33 yr at time of volvulus surgery) with true volvulus, the diagnosis at IPAA was ulcerative colitis (n=5) and Lynch syndrome with a rectal cancer. All pelvic pouches were constructed with MIS techniques, including standard laparoscopy (n=4) and single incision laparoscopic technique (n=2). All 6 patients presented with diffuse abdominal pain and abdominal distention. The average time from pouch construction to pouch volvulus was 2.5 years (range: 5.2 – 97.5 months). Computed tomography with or without rectal contrast was the initial diagnostic test in 4/6 with findings highly suspicious for pouch volvulus. Surgery was performed urgently in 5/6 of patients; all 6 had open surgery. At reoperation, all had minimal adhesions and a gap between the pouch mesentery and the retroperitoneum. Interventions included pouch-pexy (n=3), closure of gap between pouch and sacrum (n=2), and pouch excision and ileostomy (n=1). At a median of 9 months (IQR: 4–97) of follow up, pouch survival was 83%; functional outcomes included mild fecal incontinence (n=1) and paradox requiring intermittent pouch intubation for stool evacuation (n=1). Conclusions Pelvic pouches constructed by minimally invasive techniques may be at risk for pouch volvulus due to minimal adhesions. Surgeons should have a high index of suspicion for patients with unexplained abdominal pain, distension, and other obstructive symptoms. Cross-sectional imaging with rectal contrast, may help clarify the diagnosis. Immediate surgical care can allow for pouch salvage.

2021 ◽  
Vol 15 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S221-S221
Author(s):  
B Dionigi ◽  
O Lavaryk ◽  
A Lightner ◽  
S Holubar ◽  
T Hull

Abstract Background Proctocolectomy with ileal pouch anal anastomosis (IPAA) was introduced over 40 years ago, prior to the era of laparoscopy. Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) techniques have been applied to pelvic pouch surgery. One advantage of MIS is the reduction in adhesion-related complications. The lack of adhesions may result in different complications. When the pouch is not adherent in the pelvis, pouch volvulus can occur around the mesenteric axis. The aim of this study was to describe our experience with pelvic pouch volvulus. Methods Our prospectively maintained pelvic pouch registry and our enterprise wide electronic medical record were queried for keyword combinations of “pouch volvulus” between 1994 and 2020. Pouch volvulus was defined as torsion of the ileal pouch on its mesenteric axis or around small bowel maintaining the proper orientation of the ileo-anal anastomosis. Patients with pouches constructed with twisted mesenteric axis from ill-aligned anastomoses were excluded. Data for these patients was collected from the pouch registry and additional chart review. Results We identified 17 patients with pouch volvulus; of these, 11 patients did not meet our selection criteria and were excluded. Of the 6 patients (5 female; median age 25) with true volvulus, the diagnosis at IPAA was ulcerative colitis (n=5) and Lynch syndrome with a rectal cancer. All pelvic pouches were constructed with MIS techniques, including standard laparoscopy (n=4) and single incision laparoscopic technique (n=2). All 6 patients presented with diffuse abdominal pain and abdominal distention. The average time from pouch construction to pouch volvulus was 2.5 years (range: 5.2 – 97.5 months). Computed tomography with or without rectal contrast was the initial diagnostic test in 4/6 with findings highly suspicious for pouch volvulus. Surgery was performed urgently in 5/6 of patients; all 6 had open surgery. At reoperation, all had minimal adhesions and a gap between the pouch mesentery and the retroperitoneum. Interventions included pouch-pexy (n=3), closure of gap between pouch and sacrum (n=2), and pouch excision and ileostomy (n=1). At a median of 9 months (IQR: 4–97) of follow up, pouch survival was 83%; functional outcomes included mild fecal incontinence (n=1) and paradox requiring intermittent pouch intubation for stool evacuation (n=1). Conclusion Pelvic pouches constructed by minimally invasive techniques may be at risk for pouch volvulus due to minimal adhesions. Surgeons should have a high index of suspicion for patients with unexplained abdominal pain, distension, and other obstructive symptoms. Cross-sectional imaging with rectal contrast, may help clarify the diagnosis. Immediate surgical care can allow for pouch salvage.


Author(s):  
Mohamed A. Abd El Aziz ◽  
Giacomo Calini ◽  
Fabian Grass ◽  
Kevin T. Behm ◽  
Anne-Lise D’ Angelo ◽  
...  

2009 ◽  
Vol 52 (2) ◽  
pp. 187-192 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stefan D. Holubar ◽  
David W. Larson ◽  
Eric J. Dozois ◽  
Jirawat Pattana-arun ◽  
John H. Pemberton ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 31 (3) ◽  
pp. 1083-1092 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ahmet Rencuzogullari ◽  
Luca Stocchi ◽  
Meagan Costedio ◽  
Emre Gorgun ◽  
Hermann Kessler ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 110 ◽  
pp. S832-S833
Author(s):  
Matthew Coates ◽  
Leonard Baidoo ◽  
Claudia Ramos Rivers ◽  
Michael A. Dunn ◽  
Miguel Regueiro ◽  
...  

2007 ◽  
Vol 73 (10) ◽  
pp. 998-1001 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zack Medress ◽  
Phillip R. Fleshner

Unplanned readmission (UR) is considered to be an index of quality surgical care. We examined whether any perioperative factor was associated with UR after colectomy for ulcerative colitis (UC) or indeterminate colitis (IC). Patients undergoing a two-stage or three-stage ileal pouch-anal anastomosis were included. Patient, disease, and surgical factors were collected. UR occurring within 30 days of hospital discharge was assessed. The 202 study patients had a median age of 38 years. Median body mass index was 22. There were 130 (64%) UC patients and 72 (36%) IC patients. Indications for surgery were medically refractory disease (n = 176, 87%) and dysplasia/cancer (n = 26, 13%). Preoperative medical therapy included steroids alone in 25 patients and steroids combined with other immunomodulators in 151 patients. A two-stage and three-stage ileal pouch-anal anastomosis was used in 146 (72%) and 56 (28%) patients, respectively. Median white blood cell count before discharge was 8600 cells/mm3. Median length of stay after surgery was 7 days. Complications before discharge were observed in 28 patients (14%). Thirty-eight patients (19%) had a UR. No preoperative or surgical factor was associated with UR. Although UR occurs frequently (19%) after colectomy for UC or IC, it cannot be predicted.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document