scholarly journals Delayed Ileal Pouch Anal Anastomosis Has a Lower 30-Day Adverse Event Rate: Analysis From the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program

2018 ◽  
Vol 24 (8) ◽  
pp. 1833-1839 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bharati Kochar ◽  
Edward L Barnes ◽  
Anne F Peery ◽  
Katherine S Cools ◽  
Joseph Galanko ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Ulcerative colitis (UC) patients requiring colectomy often have a staged ileal pouch anal anastomosis (IPAA). There are no prospective data comparing timing of pouch creation. We aimed to compare 30-day adverse event rates for pouch creation at the time of colectomy (PTC) with delayed pouch creation (DPC). Methods Using prospectively collected data from 2011–2015 through the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program, we conducted a cohort study including subjects aged ≥18 years with a postoperative diagnosis of UC. We assessed 30-day postoperative rates of unplanned readmissions, reoperations, and major and minor adverse events (AEs), comparing the stage of the surgery where the pouch creation took place. Using a modified Poisson regression model, we estimated risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) adjusting for age, sex, race, body mass index, smoking status, diabetes, albumin, and comorbidities. Results Of 2390 IPAA procedures, 1571 were PTC and 819 were DPC. In the PTC group, 51% were on chronic immunosuppression preoperatively, compared with 15% in the DPC group (P < 0.01). After controlling for confounders, patients who had DPC were significantly less likely to have unplanned reoperations (RR, 0.42; 95% CI, 0.24–0.75), major AEs (RR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.52–0.99), and minor AEs (RR, 0.48; 95% CI, 0.32–0.73) than PTC. Conclusions Patients undergoing delayed pouch creation were at lower risk for unplanned reoperations and major and minor adverse events compared with patients undergoing pouch creation at the time of colectomy.

2018 ◽  
Vol 22 (12) ◽  
pp. 2142-2149
Author(s):  
Sebastien Lachance ◽  
Maria Abou-Khalil ◽  
Carol-Ann Vasilevsky ◽  
Gabriela Ghitulescu ◽  
Nancy Morin ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 152 (5) ◽  
pp. S1229
Author(s):  
Sebastien Lachance ◽  
Maria Abou Khalil ◽  
Nancy Morin ◽  
Carol-Ann Vasilevsky ◽  
Gabriela Ghitulescu ◽  
...  

PLoS ONE ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. e0146254 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joshua Montroy ◽  
Rodney H. Breau ◽  
Sonya Cnossen ◽  
Kelsey Witiuk ◽  
Andrew Binette ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 96 (2) ◽  
pp. E37-E45 ◽  
Author(s):  
Umang Jain ◽  
Jessica Somerville ◽  
Sujata Saha ◽  
Jon P. Ver Halen ◽  
Anuja K. Antony ◽  
...  

While neck dissection is an important primary and adjunctive procedure in the treatment of head and neck cancer, there is a paucity of studies evaluating outcomes. A retrospective review of the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database was performed to identify factors associated with adverse events (AEs) in patients undergoing neck dissection. A total of 619 patients were identified, using CPT codes specific to neck dissection. Of the 619 patients undergoing neck dissection, 142 (22.9%) experienced an AE within 30 days of the surgical procedure. Risk factors on multivariate regression analysis associated with increased AEs included dyspnea (odds ratio [OR] 2.57; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.06 to 6.22; p = 0.037), previous cardiac surgery (OR 3.38; 95% CI 1.08 to 10.52; p = 0.036), increasing anesthesia time (OR 1.005; 95% CI 1 to 1.009; p = 0.036), and increasing total work relative value units (OR 1.09; CI 1.04 to 1.13; p < 0.001). The current study is the largest, most robust analysis to identify specific risk factors associated with AEs after neck dissection. This information will assist with preoperative optimization, patient counseling, and appropriate risk stratification, and it can serve as benchmarking for institutions comparing surgical outcomes.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document