Formation of Contracts (“A Study of the Common Core of Legal Systems Conducted under the Auspices of the General Principles of Law Project of the Cornell Law School”). Vols. I and II. By Pierre Bonassies, Gino Gorla, John Leyser, Werner Lorenz, Ian R. Macneil, Karl H. Neumayer, Ishnar C. Saxena, Rudolf B. Schlesinger and W. J. Wagner. General Editor: Rudolf B. Schlesinger [Dobbs Ferry, New York: Oceana Publications Inc.; London: Stevens and Sons. 1968. xiv (Table of Contents) and 1692 pp. and 34 (Appendix and Index) pp. $35.]

1970 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
pp. 171-173
Author(s):  
Norman S. Marsh
Author(s):  
Giacinto della Cananea ◽  
Mauro Bussani

This book is about judicial review of public administration. Many have regarded this as dividing European legal orders, with judicial review of administrative action in the general courts or specialized administrative courts, or with different distance from the executive. There has been considerably less comparison of the basic procedural and substantive principles. The comparative study in this book of procedural fairness and propriety in the courts reveal not only differences but also some common and connecting elements, in a ‘common core’ perspective. The book is divided into four parts. The first explains the nature and purpose of a comparison to understand the relevance and significance of commonality and diversity between the legal systems of Europe, and which considers other legal systems which are more or less distant and distinct from Europe, such as China and Latin America. The second part contains an overview of the systems of judicial review in these legal orders. The third part, which is the heart of the ‘common core’ method, contains both a set of hypothetical cases and the solutions, according to the experts of the legal systems selected for our comparison, to the cases. The fourth part serves to examine the answers in comparative terms to ascertain not so much whether a ‘common core’ exists, but how it is shaped and evolves, also in response to the influence of supranational legal orders as the European Union and the Council of Europe.


2008 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 220-221
Author(s):  
Russell Sandberg

As part of its tenth anniversary celebrations, the Centre for Law and Religion at Cardiff University has established the Interfaith Legal Adviser Network (ILAN), the first of its kind in the UK. The Network seeks to facilitate an ongoing discussion, providing members with a greater understanding of their respective religious legal systems and the common legal issues they face. The inaugural meeting of the Network was held at Cardiff Law School on 7 December 2007.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
◽  
Aloze Ogbonna

Problem In the State of New York, the adoption and implementation of the Common Core State Standards (CCSS) and associated high-stakes assessments have sparked debates among educators, parents, students and politicians. Educators are concerned about its impact on students' test scores, graduation rates and school funding. With mounting accountability threats, teachers are forced to teach to the test in order to produce desirable test scores (Zimmerman, 2010, as cited in Pinar, 2012, p.17). Unfortunately, there were no studies that promoted understanding of teachers' concerns and the extent to which they were implementing the CCSS. The purpose of this study was to investigate teachers' concerns and the extent to which they were implementing the CCSS in language arts in the state of New York. Method The design of this study is a non-experimental quantitative design using survey research methodology. A survey using a modified Stages of Concern Questionnaire (SoCQ) and a researcher-developed implementation of language arts core standards questionnaire were given to Grades 6-12 ELA teachers from 75 selected schools in New York state. Seventy-five teachers responded to the questionnaire with 53 useable responses. The data was analyzed using descriptive statistics and bivariate correlation. Results Respondents were mostly from urban/suburban schools (90.4%). Teachers implement 13 of the 15 common core standards in language arts at least once a week (M=4.02 to M=6.15). Levels of implementation were similar in both middle and high schools (p>.05) and appear to be unrelated to number of years implementing the CCSS. Approximately half (52.8%) were at concern stages 4 to 6. And overall, there is no relationship between stage of concern and levels of implementation of the common core standards. Conclusions Teachers are adequately implementing language arts common core standards in New York. Half of the teachers' concerns are generally about how implementation of the standards affect their students and their colleagues. The other half are concerned about how implementation affects them personally. To achieve the objective of the curriculum and the Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA), teachers must continue to receive targeted professional development in their identified areas of needs.


1971 ◽  
Vol 85 (2) ◽  
pp. 530
Author(s):  
Peter B. Maggs ◽  
John N. Hazard ◽  
Samuel Kucherov
Keyword(s):  

1969 ◽  
Vol 36 (2) ◽  
pp. 448 ◽  
Author(s):  
Max Rheinstein ◽  
Rudolf B. Schlesinger
Keyword(s):  

This book is the first in a series which explores if, and to what extent, there is a common core of shared and connecting elements within the legal systems. It looks at government liability in tort as an entry point for the whole comparative research on the ‘common core of European administrative laws’. The book focuses on administrative procedure. It is divided into four parts. Part I sets the stage, explains the distinctive features of the new research, and deals with issues in methodology. Part II looks briefly at the constitutional and cultural framework in which government liability operates. Part III focuses on the main research done by presenting the case studies and supplying the answers to the hypothetical cases, which are at the heart of the ‘factual method’. Finally, Part IV compares and contrasts the information provided from Part III. It examines both the commonalities and the distinctive traits of these legal systems with a view to understanding their ‘common core’.


1969 ◽  
Vol 69 (2) ◽  
pp. 339
Author(s):  
E. Allan Farnsworth ◽  
Rudolf B. Schlesinger
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document