The Researcher and the Researched: Navigating the Challenges of Research in Conflict-Affected Environments

Author(s):  
Eleanor Gordon

Abstract Ethical concerns associated with social science research are heightened in conflict-affected environments, due to increased insecurity and the vulnerability of many research participants. This article considers some of the main challenges faced by researchers in conflict-affected environments and how they can be addressed, focusing in particular on ethical and security challenges. It also considers other challenges, which are often overlooked, such as the epistemological and methodological challenges of acquiring knowledge in conflict-affected environments, where research participants may be from different cultures, may speak different languages, and may be deeply traumatized and distrustful of others. In such places, research participants may employ techniques to assuage or discourage the researcher, including projecting borrowed narratives or remaining silent. This article argues that navigating security and ethical challenges, attending to issues of power, and remaining genuinely self-reflective can help fulfill the optimal potential of research in conflict-affected environments, which is to challenge narratives that perpetuate conflict, harm, and insecurity and to contribute to a better understanding and, thus, response to the challenges of conflict and peacebuilding.

2019 ◽  
Vol 15 (4) ◽  
pp. 271-278 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vanessa Y. Hiratsuka ◽  
Julie A. Beans ◽  
Justin Reedy ◽  
Joseph M. Yracheta ◽  
Michael T. Peercy ◽  
...  

Genomic research raises unique ethical concerns among Alaska Native and American Indian (AN/AI) people and their communities. The Center for the Ethics of Indigenous Genomic Research (CEIGR) was created to foster research that takes these concerns into account while considering the sovereign status of AN/AI tribal nations. Relationships developed within CEIGR have allowed for effective, collaborative research among individuals who come from diverse cultures, political and historical backgrounds, and academic disciplines, and who work for organizations with varying resources, capacities, and expectations. The CEIGR framework may inform other groups seeking to conduct social science research related to genomic research with tribal people and their communities.


Author(s):  
María Alejandra Energici ◽  
Nicolás Schongut ◽  
Sebastián Rojas ◽  
Samanta Alarcón

Esta entrevista presenta un diálogo con el equipo a cargo de la investigación “Cuidar. Estudio sobre tiempos, formas y espacios de cuidado en casa durante la pandemia”. Se abordan los principales desafíos teóricos y metodológicos asociados a estudiar los cuidados desde una perspectiva interdisciplinar y, a continuación, los principales hallazgos del estudio y sus implicancias en el campo de la investigación social y las políticas públicas. -- This interview presents a dialogue with the research team of the study "Cuidar. Estudio sobre tiempos, formas y espacios de cuidado en casa durante la pandemia". We first explore the theoretical and methodological challenges associated with studying care from an interdisciplinary perspective. Then, we show main findings of the study and their implications in the field of social science research and public policy.


2021 ◽  
Vol 6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laura Specker Sullivan

Neuroethics has been incorporated into neuroscience training through the Science for Monks program since 2016. In this article, I describe this in-progress effort and I consider how the program has changed since this first year to develop into a pilot program in community-engaged participatory research with the monastic community. The current goals of the project are to train the monastics in social science research skills as a means of empowering them to harness their deep knowledge of ethics and to bring it to bear on ethical challenges in neuroscience, neurology, and neurotechnology.


Politics ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 32 (3) ◽  
pp. 207-219 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard Reed

This article offers a reflection upon four aspects of methodology in the context of the author's doctoral research in Northern Ireland: managing identity and research relationships, the ethics of dissemination and the reception of potentially polemic research in the academy. It argues that identity influences research in sensitive contexts in ways that are often hard to anticipate, that more inclusive approaches to dissemination can help counter issues related to research relationships, and that responses to work in controversial contexts highlight ambiguities within the academy regarding the nature and function of social science research, presenting particular challenges for early-career researchers.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document