scholarly journals In-vitro activity of five antifungal agents against uncommon clinical isolates of Candida spp.

1999 ◽  
Vol 43 (2) ◽  
pp. 295-299 ◽  
Author(s):  
F. Barchiesi
Peptides ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 32 (1) ◽  
pp. 99-103 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. Kamysz ◽  
O. Simonetti ◽  
O. Cirioni ◽  
D. Arzeni ◽  
G. Ganzetti ◽  
...  

2002 ◽  
Vol 46 (6) ◽  
pp. 1723-1727 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. A. Pfaller ◽  
S. A. Messer ◽  
R. J. Hollis ◽  
R. N. Jones ◽  
D. J. Diekema

ABSTRACT The in vitro activities of ravuconazole and voriconazole were compared with those of amphotericin B, flucytosine (5FC), itraconazole, and fluconazole against 6,970 isolates of Candida spp. obtained from over 200 medical centers worldwide. Both ravuconazole and voriconazole were very active against all Candida spp. (MIC at which 90% of the isolates tested are inhibited [MIC90], 0.25 μg/ml; 98% of MICs were ≤1 μg/ml); however, a decrease in the activities of both of these agents was noted among isolates that were susceptible-dose dependent (fluconazole MIC, 16 to 32 μg/ml) and resistant (MIC, ≥ 64 μg/ml) to fluconazole. Candida albicans was the most susceptible species (MIC90 of both ravuconazole and voriconazole, 0.03 μg/ml), and C. glabrata was the least susceptible species (MIC90, 1 to 2 μg/ml). Ravuconazole and voriconazole were each more active in vitro than amphotericin B, 5FC, itraconazole, and fluconazole against all Candida spp. and were the only agents with good in vitro activity against C. krusei. These results provide further evidence for the spectrum and potency of ravuconazole and voriconazole against a large and geographically diverse collection of Candida spp.


1999 ◽  
Vol 44 (5) ◽  
pp. 697-700 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Chávez ◽  
S. Bernal ◽  
A. Valverde ◽  
M. J. Gutierrez ◽  
G. Quindós ◽  
...  

1996 ◽  
Vol 40 (9) ◽  
pp. 2229-2231 ◽  
Author(s):  
H M Wardle ◽  
D Law ◽  
D W Denning

We compared the in vitro activity of BMS-181184, the first compound of a new class of antifungal agents, the pradimicins, with those of fluconazole and amphotericin B against 64 clinical isolates of Candida species. MICs were determined by a microdilution method with high resolution medium for BMS-181184 and fluconazole and antibiotic medium no. 3 with 2% glucose for amphotericin B. MICs of BMS-181184 for all yeasts were in the range of 0.78 to 12.5 micrograms/ml. BMS-181184 was active against isolates resistant to other antifungal agents, consistent with a novel mode of action. Minimum fungicidal concentrations for 16 isolates showed that BMS-181184 was fungicidal. Clinical studies are now required to confirm its activity.


2009 ◽  
pp. 1-7
Author(s):  
Ana Alastruey-Izquierdo ◽  
Isabel Cuesta ◽  
Jos Houbraken ◽  
Manuel Cuenca-Estrella ◽  
Araceli Monzon ◽  
...  

2007 ◽  
Vol 51 (7) ◽  
pp. 2587-2590 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nikolaos G. Almyroudis ◽  
Deanna A. Sutton ◽  
Annette W. Fothergill ◽  
Michael G. Rinaldi ◽  
Shimon Kusne

ABSTRACT We evaluated the in vitro susceptibilities of 217 zygomycetes to amphotericin B, ketoconazole, fluconazole, itraconazole, voriconazole, posaconazole, caspofungin, and flucytosine. The significant in vitro activity of posaconazole against several species appears to support its reported clinical efficacy. Decreased susceptibility to amphotericin B was noted with Cunninghamella bertholletiae.


2007 ◽  
Vol 17 (16) ◽  
pp. 4635-4640 ◽  
Author(s):  
Franco Chimenti ◽  
Bruna Bizzarri ◽  
Elias Maccioni ◽  
Daniela Secci ◽  
Adriana Bolasco ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document