637 Free Abdominal Tissue Transfer and Utilization of the Umbilical Stalk for “Tubular” Reconstruction in Ear, Nose and Throat Defects: A Case Series

2021 ◽  
Vol 42 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S174-S175
Author(s):  
Jake Laun ◽  
Julian Pribaz

Abstract Introduction Head and neck defects, whether from burns or cancer resections, are complex and often require free flap reconstruction. Radial forearm and anterolateral thigh (ALT) flaps are commonly used due to their thin and versatile nature. However, abdominal based free tissue transfer is one valuable alternative that can cover large defects and may become a more appropriate option on the reconstructive ladder when the defect includes reconstruction of a tubular structure, such as the external auditory canal, a neck tracheostomy/stoma site or an external nasal opening. We present a novel utilization of abdominal free tissue transfer for coverage of large ear and scalp burn defects as well as neck and midface defects with usage of the umbilical stalk for tubed reconstruction. Methods Four patients presented for reconstruction: two patients had sustained large ear and scalp burns resulting in complete ear loss; one had a large neck defect resulting from recurrent cancer resection which necessitated a laryngectomy and stoma creation; and one patient had a large central face defect post-cancer resection. All four patients underwent an abdominal based free tissue transfer with reconstruction of the external auditory canal in the ear and scalp burns, stoma creation in the neck defect, and the external nasal opening in the central face defect, all utilizing the vascularized umbilical stalk for the tubed reconstruction. Results All patients recovered post-operatively without any reported complications such as tubular stenosis or contracture while maintaining umbilical stalk tubular patency. Conclusions Reconstruction of a tubed structure in head and neck defects, whether the external auditory meatus, an external nasal opening or a neck stoma post burn or cancer resection, can be a difficult and challenging operation fraught with potential complications. We present a novel method of reconstruction of large defects employing the use of the uniquely thin and vascularized umbilical stalk for tubular reconstruction.

2016 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 47
Author(s):  
Windy A. Olaya ◽  
Lauren T. Daly ◽  
Emily G. Clark ◽  
Thomas Scholz ◽  
Vincent Laurence ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 34 (02) ◽  
pp. 086-091
Author(s):  
Arvind K. Badhey ◽  
Mohemmed N. Khan

AbstractPalatomaxillary reconstruction presents a unique challenge for the reconstructive surgeon. The maxillofacial skeleton preserves critical aerodigestive functions—it provides a stable hard palate to support mastication and separate the nasal and oral cavities, and buttress support to provide adequate midface contour. Free tissue transfer has become a routine part of the reconstructive ladder in managing palatomaxillary defects. While there is a wide variety of options for bony reconstruction within the head and neck, the fibula and the scapula, and their variations, have become two of the most commonly used options for midface reconstruction. This review will discuss the advantages and disadvantages of both in specific regard to reconstruction of the palatomaxillary area.


2003 ◽  
Vol 113 (12) ◽  
pp. 2078-2085 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eric J. Moore ◽  
Scott A. Strome ◽  
Jan L. Kasperbauer ◽  
David A. Sherris ◽  
Lance A. Manning

2021 ◽  
Vol 54 (02) ◽  
pp. 118-123
Author(s):  
Rajan Arora ◽  
Kripa Shanker Mishra ◽  
Hemant T. Bhoye ◽  
Ajay Kumar Dewan ◽  
Ravi K. Singh ◽  
...  

Abstract Background There is a steep learning curve to attain a consistently good result in microvascular surgery. The venous anastomosis is a critical step in free-tissue transfer. The margin of error is less and the outcome depends on the surgeon’s skill and technique. Mechanical anastomotic coupling device (MACD) has been proven to be an effective alternative to hand-sewn (HS) technique for venous anastomosis, as it requires lesser skill. However, its feasibility of application in emerging economy countries is yet to be established. Material and Method We retrospectively analyzed the data of patients who underwent free-tissue transfer for head and neck reconstruction between July 2015 and October 2020. Based on the technique used for the venous anastomosis, the patients were divided into an HS technique and MACD group. Patient characteristics and outcomes were measured. Result A total of 1694 venous anastomoses were performed during the study period. There were 966 patients in the HS technique group and 719 in the MACD group. There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in terms of age, sex, prior radiotherapy, prior surgery, and comorbidities. Venous thrombosis was noted in 62 (6.4%) patients in the HS technique group and 7 (0.97%) in the MACD group (p = 0.000). The mean time taken for venous anastomosis in the HS group was 17 ± 4 minutes, and in the MACD group, it was 5 ± 2 minutes (p = 0.0001). Twenty-five (2.56%) patients in the HS group and 4 (0.55%) patients in MACD group had flap loss (p = 0.001). Conclusion MACD is an effective alternative for HS technique for venous anastomosis. There is a significant reduction in anastomosis time, flap loss, and return to operation theater due to venous thrombosis. MACD reduces the surgeon’s strain, especially in a high-volume center. Prospective randomized studies including economic analysis are required to prove the cost-effectiveness of coupler devices.


2004 ◽  
Vol 131 (6) ◽  
pp. 958-963 ◽  
Author(s):  
Douglas B. Chepeha ◽  
Steven J. Wang ◽  
Lawrence J. Marentette ◽  
Byron G. Thompson ◽  
Mark E. Prince ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document