Use of Survivorship Care Plans in the United States: Associations With Survivorship Care

Purpose: Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer death and is a significant source of morbidity. Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) have been shown to be prognostic for survival. We have analyzed emerging patterns of longitudinal PROs collected in the development of survivorship care plans (SCPs). Methods: OncoLife and the LIVESTRONG Care Plans are Internet-based programs designed to generate unique SCPs. We selected SCPs from patients identifying as survivors of primary lung cancer. Patient-reported demographics and treatment and toxicity data were examined. Effects were categorized by the physiologic system that they affected. Results: Six hundred eighty-nine plans were created for users self-identifying as survivors of primary lung cancer. Average time from diagnosis to reporting was 1.68 years (range, 0 to 24 years). Most were white (85.9%), well educated (61.1% “some college” or higher), and lived in the United States (90.7%). Patients underwent chemotherapy (75.8%), radiotherapy (54.7%), and surgery (54.4%). Neurocognitive symptoms (eg, fatigue, cognitive changes) were the most common (48.8%), especially among those receiving chemotherapy, followed by musculoskeletal/dermatologic symptoms (14.1%) and thoracic symptoms (13.5%). Only 11.2% were initially offered an SCP. Of those offered SCPs, 54.5% were offered by their health care provider, and most often were at a non–university-based cancer center (66.2%). Conclusion: For patients with lung cancer worldwide, it is feasible to obtain PROs and to create SCPs through an Internet-based program. As patients with lung cancer achieve improved survival, further attention should be paid to PROs. Surprisingly, neurocognitive symptoms seem to be the most common issues and therefore the most important to address. Increased effort should be made to provide SCPs, particularly in urban and university cancer center settings.

Download Full-text

Survivorship care plans and adherence with surveillance schedule in patients with invasive melanoma.

Journal of Clinical Oncology ◽

10.1200/jco.2021.39.15_suppl.e24079 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽

pp. e24079-e24079

Author(s):

Hemali Shah ◽

Paul Feustel ◽

Lindy Davis

Keyword(s):

Primary Melanoma ◽

The United States ◽

Categorical Variables ◽

Second Primary ◽

Survivorship Care Plans ◽

Survivorship Care ◽

Care Plans ◽

Common Diagnosis ◽

The Impact

e24079 Background: Melanoma accounts for 5.5% of new cancer diagnoses in the United States, and the 5-year overall survival is 93%. Overall, 7% of patients develop a recurrence, and 4-8% develop a second primary melanoma. This study aimed to assess how the standards set by the American College of Surgeons Commission on Cancer (CoC) to provide survivorship care plans (SCP) to patients may improve adherence to surveillance visits. Methods: All patients treated for invasive melanoma at our institution between 8/2018-2/2020 were included. SCP containing stage, treatment summary, and surveillance plan were delivered in-person to patients and sent to primary providers and dermatologists as outlined by CoC Standards for Optimal Care. Psychosocial distress (PSD) screening was performed using the National Comprehensive Cancer Network Distress Thermometer, with scores > 4 requiring further evaluation by oncology social worker. SCP and PSD were provided during the initiation phase of our cancer care program, and half the patients received services. Surveillance adherence was determined from chart review. The two groups were compared by t-test for continuous or chi-square test for categorical variables. Multiple regression analysis with odds ratios were performed. Mann-Whitney analysis was performed to assess the impact of SCP on PSD. Results: Of 146 patients identified for our cohort, 73 received SCP and PSD screening. Stage IA was the most common diagnosis (44%), followed by IB (13%) and IIIC (9%). Ninety-eight patients (67%) were adherent to all surveillance visits, and 55 of these received SCPs. Most patients noted low distress without the need for further support (79%), and 12 (21%) scored ≥4, benefiting from emotional and financial support and appointment and health insurance navigation. High PSD score did not correlate with advanced stage. Reception of SCP (p = 0.036) and close distance to treating facility (p = 0.016) improved adherence to surveillance visits. For patients who did not receive SCP, likelihood to follow up decreased by a factor of 0.469 (95% CI 0.231 - 0.952). Sex, age, PSD score, and stage did not affect surveillance adherence (p = NS). There were 6 recurrences, of which 4 were physician-detected during surveillance, and 8 patients developed second primary melanomas, all physician-detected. Conclusions: Delivery of SCP, a component of which includes counseling regarding signs and symptoms of recurrence or possibility of second primary melanoma, leads to significantly higher rates of surveillance adherence. This was shown for all stages. Melanoma survivors require close clinical follow-up, as demonstrated by our study finding that even with patient education, most recurrences and all new primary melanomas were physician-detected. PSD among melanoma patients is common, and all patients regardless of stage should undergo screening, as even early-stage patients exhibited distress.

Download Full-text

Barriers to Breast and Colorectal Cancer Survivorship Care: Perceptions of Primary Care Physicians and Medical Oncologists in the United States

Journal of Clinical Oncology ◽

10.1200/jco.2012.45.6954 ◽

2013 ◽

Vol 31 (18) ◽

pp. 2322-2336 ◽

Cited By ~ 53

Author(s):

Katherine S. Virgo ◽

Catherine C. Lerro ◽

Carrie N. Klabunde ◽

Craig Earle ◽

Patricia A. Ganz

Keyword(s):

Colorectal Cancer ◽

United States ◽

Primary Care ◽

Cancer Survivorship ◽

Preventive Care ◽

Primary Care Physicians ◽

The United States ◽

Survivorship Care ◽

Care Plans ◽

Medical Oncologists

Purpose High-quality, well-coordinated cancer survivorship care is needed yet barriers remain owing to fragmentation in the United States health care system. This article is a nationwide survey of barriers perceived by primary care physicians (PCPs) and medical oncologists (MOs) regarding breast and colorectal cancer survivorship care beyond 5 years after treatment. Methods The Survey of Physician Attitudes Regarding the Care of Cancer Survivors was mailed out in 2009 to a nationally-representative sample (n = 3,596) of US PCPs and MOs. Ten physician-perceived cancer survivorship care barriers/concerns were compared between the two provider types. Using weighted multinomial logistic regression, we modeled each barrier, adjusting for physician demographics, reimbursement, training, and practice characteristics. Results We received responses from 2,202 physicians (1,072 PCPs; 1,130 MOs; 65.1% cooperation rate). In adjusted patient-related barriers models, MOs were more likely than PCPs to report patient language barriers (odds ratio, [OR], 1.72; 95% CI, 1.22 to 2.42), insurance restrictions impeding test/treatment use (OR, 1.42; 95% CI, 1.03 to 1.96), and patients requesting more aggressive testing (OR, 4.08; 95% CI, 2.73 to 6.10). In adjusted physician-related barriers models, PCPs were more likely to report inadequate training (OR, 3.06; 95% CI, 2.03 to 4.61) and ordering additional tests/treatments because of malpractice concerns (OR, 1.87; 95% CI, 1.20 to 2.93). MOs were more likely to report uncertainty regarding general preventive care responsibility (often/always: OR, 1.97; 95% CI, 1.13 to 3.43; sometimes: OR, 2.16; 95% CI, 1.60 to 2.93). Conclusion MOs and PCPs perceive different cancer follow-up care barriers/concerns to be problematic. Resolving inadequate training, malpractice-driven test ordering, and preventive-care responsibility concerns may require continuing education, explicit guidelines, and survivorship care plans. Reviewing care plans with survivors may also reduce patients' requests for unnecessary testing.

Download Full-text

Survivorship care planning in neuro-oncology

Neuro-Oncology Practice ◽

10.1093/nop/npx034 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 5 (1) ◽

pp. 3-9 ◽

Cited By ~ 3

Author(s):

Heather E Leeper ◽

Alvina A Acquaye ◽

Susan Bell ◽

Jennifer L Clarke ◽

Deborah Forst ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Critical Time ◽

The United States ◽

Care Plan ◽

Survivorship Care Plan ◽

Survivorship Care Plans ◽

Care Planning ◽

Institute Of Medicine ◽

Survivorship Care ◽

Care Plans ◽

Survivorship Care Planning

Abstract Cancer patient survivorship has become a significant topic within oncology care for both adult and pediatric patients. Starting in 2005, the Institute of Medicine recommended the use of survivorship care plans to assist patients transitioning from active treatment to the posttreatment phase of their cancer care, a critical time for many patients. Since 2014 there has been a mandate within the United States for adult cancer patients treated with curative intent to receive survivorship care plans comprised of a treatment summary and a follow-up plan to facilitate a better understanding among patients of what to expect after treatment. In addition to a general oncology survivorship care plan, specific care plans have been created for breast, lung, prostate, and colon cancers, as well as lymphoma. A survivorship care plan specific to adult neuro-oncology has been developed by a multidisciplinary and interprofessional committee, with approval from the Society for Neuro-Oncology Guidelines Committee. It has been published in compendium with this review of survivorship care planning and available as a fillable PDF on the Society of Neuro-Oncology Guidelines Endorsement web page (https://www.soc-neuro-onc.org/SNO/Resources/Survivorship_Care_Plan.aspx). Implementation of this survivorship care plan provides a unique opportunity to begin addressing the range of survivorship issues our neuro-oncology patients navigate from diagnosis to end of life.

Download Full-text