scholarly journals Body Size Stigmatization: An Examination of Attitudes of African American Preschool-Age Children Attending Head Start

2007 ◽  
Vol 33 (5) ◽  
pp. 487-496 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. S. Margulies ◽  
R. G. Floyd ◽  
R. L. Hojnoski
2000 ◽  
Vol 81 (2) ◽  
pp. 186-196 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jay Fagan ◽  
Nidhal Newash ◽  
Annemarie Schloesser

This study of 59 randomly selected female caregivers explored the level of involvement of Head Start fathers and other significant males with their preschool-age children. The findings revealed that the majority of households had a significant male living in them. Almost all of the female caregivers reported a significant male's involvement, and almost one-half reported a second significant male's involvement, in their Head Start child's life. Significant males' involvement was concentrated in the areas of physical care and socialization, and the men were perceived to have little involvement in Head Start activities. Implications for Head Start programs are discussed.


1976 ◽  
Vol 45 (2) ◽  
pp. 331-335 ◽  
Author(s):  
John H. Himes ◽  
Reynaldo Martorell ◽  
Jean-Pierre Habicht ◽  
Charles Yarbrough ◽  
Robert M. Malina ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 27 (6) ◽  
pp. 751-769 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ji Young Choi ◽  
Sherri Castle ◽  
Amy C. Williamson ◽  
Emisha Young ◽  
Lauren Worley ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. 238-238
Author(s):  
Leah May ◽  
Amy Sharn ◽  
Miranda Westrick ◽  
Ashley Walther ◽  
Carolyn Gunther

Abstract Objectives Simple Suppers is a 10-week evidence-based intervention (EBI) designed to improve family mealtime routines and child weight status among racially diverse elementary-age children from low-income households. Results from a previous trial demonstrated effectiveness, thereby warranting a scale-out study to reach other child populations (i.e., preschool-age children). In the current study, Southside Simple Suppers Scale-Up (S4), we propose a hybrid type 2 effectiveness-implementation trial, which has a dual focus on effectiveness and implementation outcomes. This type of trial will allow facilitation of the research translation process to develop effective solutions to promote the health of preschool-age children. Methods S4 is occurring during the 2019–20 school year (fall, winter, spring) at 3 Head Start sites (school readiness program for low-income children). Effectiveness outcomes (child food preparation skills, family meal routines) are collected at pre- and post-programming via direct measure and survey. Child food preparation skills are rated on 4-point Likert scale (strongly disagree to strongly agree). Family mealtime routines (i.e., eating meals together, TV on while eating) are reported by number of days per week. Implementation outcomes (adoption, fidelity, fiscal efficiency) are collected throughout programming. Adoption is assessed by weekly attendance. Fidelity is assessed with a program-specific checklist and videotaping. Fiscal efficiency is evaluated by assessing cost of programming per family. Results Nineteen caregivers completed data collection for the fall session. 55.6% families were low-income. Mean(SD) caregiver age was 37.6(12.1) yr, 94.7% were female, 84.2% were Black, and mean(SD) BMI was 35.3(11.2) kg/m2. Mean(SD) child age was 3.4(0.5) yr, 47.6% were female, and mean (SD) BMI z-score was 1.16(1.38). Child food preparation skills significantly increased from pre- to post-test (P < 0.05); there were no significant changes in family mealtime routines. Programming was delivered as intended 78% of the time and mean cost of weekly programming was $8.63 per family. Programming and data collection will be complete in spring 2020. Conclusions Results from this novel hybrid effectiveness-implementation trial will inform the future scale-up of the EBI Simple Suppers program in Head Start. Funding Sources USDA NIFA.


1979 ◽  
Vol 46 (1) ◽  
pp. 8-13 ◽  
Author(s):  
Douglas G. Ullman ◽  
Donald F. Kausch

The ability of the Minnesota Child Development Inventory (MCDI) to identify developmental strengths and weaknesses was investigated with 60 nursery school children and 62 Head Start children. As expected, the MCDI identified more problems in the high risk Head Start group and, for five of the eight developmental areas, significantly predicted subsequent Head Start teacher evaluations of each child. Also, modifying the MCDI cutoff score reduced substantially the false negatives. Thus, the MCDI was found to show some promise as a useful developmental screening instrument for lower socioeconomic, preschool age children. Implications for remedial planning are addressed.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document