Cancer

Aetiology and dietary recommendations, Cancer cachexia, Neutropenia and food hygiene, Late effects, Palliative care in cancer

Author(s):  
Denah Taggart ◽  
Robert Goldsby ◽  
Anuradha Banerjee
Keyword(s):  

Author(s):  
Eric Chang ◽  
Robert Goldsby ◽  
Sabine Mueller ◽  
Anu Banerjee
Keyword(s):  

Author(s):  
Jim Cassidy ◽  
Donald Bissett ◽  
Roy A. J. Spence OBE ◽  
Miranda Payne ◽  
Gareth Morris-Stiff

An introduction to the theory of palliative care, followed by a practical step-by-step guide to the management of physical and psychological symptoms, including advice on appropriate prescribing in this complex group of patients.


2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (31_suppl) ◽  
pp. 100-100
Author(s):  
Koji Amano ◽  
Tatsuya Morita ◽  
Jiro Miyamoto ◽  
Teruaki Uno ◽  
Hirofumi Katayama ◽  
...  

100 Background: Few studies have investigated the need for nutritional support in advanced cancer patients in palliative care settings.The aim of this survey is to examine the relationship between the need for nutritional support and cancer cachexia, specific needs, perceptions, and beliefs. Methods: We conducted a questionnaire in outpatient service/palliative care teams/palliative care units. Patients were classified into two groups: 1) Non-cachexia/Pre-cachexia and 2) Cachexia/Refractory cachexia. Results: A total of 117 out of 121 patients responded (96.7%). A significant difference was observed in the need for nutritional support between the groups: Non-cachexia/Pre-cachexia (32.7%) and Cachexia/Refractory cachexia (53.6%) (p = 0.031). The specific needs of patients requiring nutritional support were nutritional counseling (93.8%), ideas to improve food intake (87.5%), oral nutritional supplements (83.0%), parenteral nutrition and hydration (77.1%), and tube feeding (22.9%). The top perceptions regarding the best time to receive nutritional support and the best medical staff to provide nutritional support were “when anorexia, weight loss, and muscle weakness become apparent” (48.6%) and “nutritional support team” (67.3%), respectively. The top three beliefs of nutritional treatments were “I do not wish to receive tube feeding” (78.6%), “parenteral nutrition and hydration are essential” (60.7%), and “parenteral hydration is essential” (59.6%). Conclusions: Patients with cancer cachexia had a greater need for nutritional support. Advanced cancer patients wished to receive nutritional support from medical staff with specific knowledge when they become unable to take sufficient nourishment orally and the negative impact of cachexia becomes apparent. Additionally, most patients wished to receive parenteral nutrition and hydration.


2014 ◽  
Vol 32 (31_suppl) ◽  
pp. 67-67
Author(s):  
Neha Kapoor ◽  
Ihab Tewfik ◽  
Jane Naufahu ◽  
Sundus Tewfik ◽  
Rakesh Garg ◽  
...  

67 Background: The prevalence of malnutrition, amongst cancer palliative patients, is 81%. As cancer progresses, patients’ develop malnutrition owing to metabolic changes and ill-effects of treatment. The aim of this study was to improve nutritional status of female cancer patients and their quality of life by counseling and providing nutrient rich natural food (IAtta). Methods: Female cancer patients (n=45) attending palliative care clinic (AIIMS, New Delhi); with symptoms of cachexia were randomly distributed into control (Group one, n=23) and intervention group (Group two, n=22). Both groups were provided with nutritional counseling while the intervention group also received 100grams of IAtta, to be consumed daily for three months. Anthropometric measurements [weight, muscle mass, percentage body fat (%BF) and mid upper arm circumference (MUAC)], dietary intake (two day dietary recall) and quality of life (European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer-Quality of Life C30 Questionnaire) were assessed at baseline and after three months. Data was analysed using paired t-test and Wilcoxon signed-rank test on the variables assessed. P-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant at 95% confidence interval. Results: Patients in group one had significantly decreased body weight (p= 0.001), muscle mass (p= 0.021), MUAC (p= 0.005) and %BF (p= 0.001) by end of three months. While patients in group two reported significant improvement in fatigue (p= 0.001) and appetite loss score (p= 0.002) under quality of life domains. Conclusions: Nutritional counseling along with IAtta food supplementation helps in stabilising weight and improves quality of life of cancer cachexia patients undergoing palliative care treatment. Clinical trial information: RP- 02/17.06.2013. [Table: see text]


2016 ◽  
Vol 34 (26_suppl) ◽  
pp. 58-58
Author(s):  
Jenny Power ◽  
Miriam Colleran

58 Background: Renal function is important in a palliative care population and can impact on frequently-used medications including chemotherapeutic agents, opioids, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and neuropathic agents. In local practice, estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), calculated on a presumed weight of 70kg, is displayed in laboratory results. However, the weight of palliative patients varies considerably, for example, due to cancer cachexia or malabsorption and a considerable population weigh less than 70kg. Our aim was to assess whether there is a discrepancy between glomerular filtration rate when laboratory-estimated versus weight-based and to explore the potential clinical relevance. Methods: Data was retrospectively collated for 50 patients admitted consecutively to a specialist palliative care unit over a 6 month period. Laboratory-derived eGFR was compared to GFR using the Cockroft-Gault equation (CreatClear = Sex*(140-Age)/(SerumCreat))*(Weight/72). Results: 25 (50%) patients were admitted for end of life care, 19 (38%) for symptom control, 6 (12%) for respite. 36 patients (72%) had weight documented. 45 (90%) patients had bloods taken. 41 patients had an eGFR documented, 7 of whom had an eGFR of less than 60ml/min. 25 patients had a weight-based GFR calculated of whom 10 (40%) had a GFR less than 60ml/min A significant discrepancy was seen between estimated and calculated GFR in 7 of these (accounting for 28%). This was most notable at less than 65kg. 2 patients with a weight of 55kg had a greater than 40ml/min difference in creatinine clearance. 50% of patients with a GFR of less than 60ml/min were on at least one nephrotoxic drug, most frequently pregabalin or ibuprofen. The most frequently-used opioid was oxycodone. No patient had opioids or medications discontinued on the basis of renal function. Conclusions: Results show a significant discrepancy between estimated and calculated GFR in a palliative care population which is most pronounced at lower weights. We would recommend, where appropriate, calculating a weight-based GFR on patients, with a review of opioid and nephrotoxic medications when reduced.


2014 ◽  
Vol 10 (4) ◽  
pp. 172-177
Author(s):  
Hana Yoshida ◽  
Yuya Ise ◽  
Shirou Katayama

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document