Introducing antimicrobial stewardship to the outpatient clinics of a suburban academic health system

Objective: To establish an antimicrobial stewardship program in the outpatient setting. Design: Prescribers of antimicrobials were asked to complete a survey regarding antimicrobial stewardship. We also monitored their compliance with appropriate prescribing practices, which were shared in monthly quality improvement reports. Setting: The study was performed at Loyola University Health System, an academic teaching healthcare system in a metropolitan suburban environment. Participants: Prescribers of antimicrobials across 19 primary care and 3 immediate- and urgent-care clinics. Methods: The voluntary survey was developed using SurveyMonkeyand was distributed via e-mail. Data were collected anonymously. Rates of compliance with appropriate prescribing practices were abstracted from electronic health records and assessed by 3 metrics: (1) avoidance of antibiotics in adult acute bronchitis and appropriate antibiotic treatment in (2) patients tested for pharyngitis and (3) children with upper respiratory tract infections. Results: Prescribers were highly knowledgeable about what constitutes appropriate prescribing; verified compliance rates were highly concordant with self-reported rates. Nearly all prescribers were concerned about resistance, but fewer than half believed antibiotics were overprescribed in their office. Among respondents, 74% reported intense pressure from patients to prescribe antimicrobials inappropriately. Immediate- and urgent-care prescribers had higher rates of compliance than primary-care prescribers, and the latter group responded well to monthly reports and online educational resources. Conclusions: Intense pressure from patients to prescribe antimicrobials when they are not indicated leads to overprescribing, an effect compounded by the importance of patient satisfaction scores. Compliance reporting improved the number of appropriate antibiotics prescribed in the primary care setting.

103. Expansion of an Antimicrobial Stewardship Program Through Implementation of a Discharge Verification Queue

Background Antimicrobial stewardship programs (ASPs) have traditionally focused interventions on inpatient care to improve antibiotic prescribing. Support of effective interventions for ASPs targeting antibiotic prescriptions at hospital discharge is emerging. Our objective was to expand stewardship services into the outpatient setting through implementation of a process by the antimicrobial stewardship team (AST) to verify antimicrobials prescribed at discharge. Methods This quality improvement initiative incorporated a discharge order verification queue managed by AST pharmacists to review electronically prescribed antimicrobials Monday through Friday, from 8:00 am to 4:00 pm. The queue was piloted Sep 2020 and expanded hospital-wide Feb 2021. Patients < 18 years old and those with observation or emergency department status were excluded. The AST pharmacist reviewed discharge prescriptions for appropriateness, intervened directly with prescribers, and either rejected or verified prescriptions prior to transmission to outpatient pharmacies. Complicated cases were reviewed with the AST physician to evaluate intervention appropriateness. Interventions were categorized as either dose adjustment, duration, escalation or de-escalation, discontinuation, or safety monitoring. Results A total of 602 prescriptions were reviewed between Sep 2020 and Apr 2021. An AST pharmacist intervened on 28% (171/602) of prescriptions. The most common intervention types were duration (41%, 70/171), discontinuation (18%, 31/171), and dose adjustment (17%, 30/171). The most common indications in which the duration was shortened was community acquired pneumonia (26%, 18/70), skin and soft tissue infection (21%, 15/70), and urinary tract infection (17%, 12/70). The most common antibiotics recommended for discontinuation were cephalexin (32%, 10/31) and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (10%, 3/31). The overall intervention acceptance rate was 78%. Conclusion An AST pharmacist review of antimicrobial prescriptions at discharge improved appropriate prescribing. The discharge queue serves as an effective stewardship strategy for inpatient ASPs to expand into the outpatient setting. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

149. Impact of Stewardship on Antibiotic Utilization Rates During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Successes and Challenges in a Regional Hospital

Background Antibiotic stewardship (AS) is at the core of patient safety and prevention of antimicrobial resistance. Healthcare providers prescribe antibiotics for COVID-19 despite low rates of bacterial co-infection. Our regional hospital had antibiotic utilization (AU) rates higher than other health systems even prior to the emergence of SARS-Cov2. We analyzed the effect AS on AU during the pandemic. Total Antibiotic Utilization Rates Before and During COVID-19 Pandemic Methods Total and specific AU rates were benchmarked using BD MedMined’s medication analytics system from 2nd quarter 2019 to 1st quarter 2021. The AS team released yearly antibiogram and individual prescriber’s AU rates and performed weekly, and as needed, review of antibiotic ordering and feedback. To assist in appropriate prescribing decisions, remote educational sessions or mini-lectures and local antibiotic guidelines were developed during the pandemic period. AU rates were monitored quarterly to determine the effects of the AS interventions to prescribing practices. Results Total and specific AU rates were higher (up to 34% and 80%, respectively) in our index hospital compared to other non-teaching hospitals nationally prior to the pandemic. Total antibiotic utilization increased by only 5.5% in the 2nd quarter 2020, peak of AU during the pandemic. Total, vancomycin, piperacillin-tazobactam and quinolone utilization rates decreased by 19%, 41%, 38%, and 52%, respectively, at 1st quarter 2021 compared to 4th quarter 2019. Steeper decreases were noted with implementation of educational activities. Ceftriaxone use remained high and was 50% greater than comparator hospitals at 1st quarter 2021. Conclusion Although problematic during the COVID-19 pandemic, AS can have significant impact on provider prescribing practices and decrease total and specific antibiotic utilization rates. The use of ceftriaxone, an antibiotic commonly used for empiric bacterial coverage for community acquired pneumonia, presents as a continuing challenge. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

1123. Appropriateness of Antibiotic Prescribing Through the COVID-19 Pandemic and Associated Telehealth Visits

Background The COVID-19 pandemic and resulting mitigation strategies have impacted rates of outpatient infections and delivery of care to pediatric patients. Virtual healthcare was rapidly implemented but much is unknown about the quality of care provided in telehealth visits. We sought to describe changes in visits throughout the pandemic and evaluate the appropriateness of antibiotic prescribing. Methods We utilized EHR data from a large health care system that provides primary care via pediatric, family medicine, and urgent care clinics. We included outpatient visits from 1/1/19 - 4/30/21 for children < 20 years. The COVID-19 era was defined as after March 2020. Visits were labeled as virtual according to coded encounter or visit type variables. The appropriateness of antibiotic prescriptions was assigned using a previously published ICD-10 classification scheme that defines each prescription as appropriate, potentially appropriate, or inappropriate (Chua, et al. BMJ, 2019). Results There were 805,130 outpatient visits during the study period. The mean rate of antibiotic prescriptions in the pre-pandemic period was 23% (range 17-26% per month) and 11% (range 9-15%) in the COVID-19 era. Mean rates of inappropriate prescribing were 17% (range 14-20% per month) and 20% (range 19-22%), respectively (Figure 1). Coded virtual visits during the COVID-19 era were uncommon (1-2%) with the exception of April and May 2020 (11% and 5%, respectively). During the COVID-19 era, approximately 9% of telehealth visits resulted in antibiotics, compared to 11% of in-person visits (Table 1). Virtual visits had lower rates of inappropriate and appropriate prescribing, but higher rates of potentially appropriate prescribing (Table 1). Visits and associated antibiotic prescribing in the pre-pandemic and COVID-19 era Appropriateness of antibiotic prescribing in the COVID-19 era, by visit type Conclusion Rates and volume of antibiotic prescribing in outpatient pediatric visits have declined in the COVID-19 era, while rates of inappropriate prescribing have increased slightly. Our study suggests use of telehealth for pediatric visits was minimal and led to higher prescribing rates for “potentially appropriate” indications. This could be explained by a lack of clinical certainty in conditions such as otitis media and pharyngitis in virtual visits. Disclosures Bethany A. Wattles, PharmD, MHA, Merck (Grant/Research Support, Research Grant or Support) Yana Feygin, Master of Science, Merck (Grant/Research Support, Research Grant or Support) Michelle D. Stevenson, MD, MS, Merck (Grant/Research Support) Michael J. Smith, MD, M.S.C.E, Merck (Grant/Research Support)Pfizer (Grant/Research Support)

920 Improving the Management of Post-Operative Hypocalcaemia In Thyroid Surgery

Aim Hypocalcaemia is a frequent, and potentially dangerous, complication of total thyroidectomy [1, 2] due to the removal of the parathyroid glands. This quality improvement (QI) project was undertaken in a large Ear, Nose and Throat department in the East of England over a year. The project improved postoperative guideline compliance by optimising the recognition and management of patients at risk of hypocalcaemia. This process focussed on improving parathyroid hormone (PTH) and calcium blood testing, appropriate prescribing and the monitoring and management of hypocalcaemia. Method A baseline audit was conducted to determine initial guideline compliance. The QI process subsequently involved the introduction of a new intraoperative PTH pathway and the amendment of trust guidelines. In addition, there was a focus on improving clinician awareness of guidelines, junior doctor education, communication between operating surgeons and junior doctors and the optimisation of patient handover. Results The measurement of PTH at four hours improved from 42.5% to 52.2%. The project saw a significant improvement in the monitoring of hypocalcaemia (from 22.2% to 83.3% for patients with an intermediate risk of hypocalcaemia) and in the prescribing of prophylactic calcium supplements from 7.5% to 43.5%. Conclusions By optimising postoperative care this QI project improved patient safety as well as impacting on the duration, and overall cost, of inpatient stay.

Pharmacogenomic alerts: developing guidance for use by healthcare professionals

Background: For diseases with a genetic cause genomics can deliver improved diagnostics and facilitate access to targeted treatments. Drug pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics are often dependent on genetic variation underlying these processes. As pharmacogenomics comes of age it may be the first way in which genomics is utilised at a population level. Still required is guidance and standards of how genomic information can be communicated within the health record, and how clinicians should be alerted to variation impacting the use of medicines. Methods: The Professional Record Standards Body commissioned by National Health Service England developed guidance on using pharmacogenomics information in clinical practice. We conducted research with those implementing pharmacogenomics in England and internationally to produce guidance and recommendations for a systems-based approach. Results: A consensus viewpoint is that systems need to be in place to ensure the safe provision of pharmacogenomics information that is curated, actionable and up-to-date. Standards should be established with respect to notification and information exchange, which could impact new or existing prescribing and these must be in keeping with routine practice. Alerting systems should contribute to safer practices. Conclusion: Ensuring pharmacogenetics information is available to make use of medicines safer will require major effort of which this guidance is a beginning. Standards are required to ensure useful genomic information within the health record can be communicated to clinicians in the right format and times to be actioned successfully. A multidisciplinary group of stakeholders must be engaged in developing pharmacogenomic standards to support the most appropriate prescribing.

Opioid therapy

This chapter on opioids is in two parts: basic science and clinical. It includes the current evidence on where and how opioids work to mediate analgesia, non-analgesic effects, and unwanted side effects. In addition, the activity and impact of opioids in brain networks is discussed. These complex dynamic concepts are explained through functional magnetic resonance imaging findings and enables a greater understanding of opioid mechanisms. Mechanism and evidence of less studied side effects such as opioid-induced hyperalgesia along with immune and endocrine side effects are examined. Current genomic evidence and clinical application of this is discussed. The clinical part of the chapter gives complete information on the pharmacology of all opioids which are in clinical use, along with detailed information on when to prescribe and how to prescribe effectively and safely. Finally, the challenges of opioid prescribing in the twenty-first century are addressed. Identification of patient risk factors and appropriate prescribing and monitoring are presented in an agreed and practical way.

Antibiotic Prescribing in Adults Presenting with Pharyngitis Pre- and Post-Implementation of a Rapid Group A Streptococcus Test

Background: Group A Streptococcus (GAS) pharyngitis is the most common bacterial cause of acute pharyngitis and is often over treated with unnecessary antibiotics. The purpose was to evaluate if implementation of a rapid antigen detection test (RADT) for GAS would reduce the number of inappropriately prescribed antibiotics for adult patients presenting with symptoms of pharyngitis. Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study of adult urgent care clinic patients pre- and post-implementation of a GAS RADT. We included patients who had a diagnosis of GAS identified via ICD-10 codes and either a throat culture, GAS RADT, or antibiotic prescribed for GAS. Antibiotic prescribing was assessed as appropriate or inappropriate based on testing and IDSA guideline recommendations. Thirty-day follow-up visits related to pharyngitis or the prescribed antibiotics was also evaluated. Results: A total of 1734 patients were included; 912 and 822 in the pre- and post-implementation groups, respectively. Following implementation of the GAS RADT, there was an increase in the number of antibiotics prescribed for GAS (43.4% vs 59.1%, P < .001) as well as an increase in appropriate prescribing (67.6% vs 77.5%, P < .001). More 30-day pharyngitis-related follow-up visits were seen in the pre-intervention group (12.5% vs 9.3%, P = .03). Conclusion: Implementation of a RADT for GAS pharyngitis was associated with an increase in both the overall number of antibiotic prescriptions for GAS and the proportion of appropriately prescribed antibiotics. There was also a reduction in follow up visits related to GAS pharyngitis, however educational efforts to further increase appropriate prescribing is needed.