Cervical Facet Nerve Block: Ultrasound

Fluoroscopic Control ◽

Actual Target ◽

Cervical Facet ◽

Better Than

The cervical facet joints are well-documented sources of chronic neck pain and headache. Ultrasound may offer the advantage of visualizing the actual target nerves, which is not possible with fluoroscopy. The relevant structures are located much more superficially than in the lumbar spine, hence visibility of the potential targets with ultrasound is expected to be better than in the lumbar region. Besides the ability to perform diagnostic nerve blocks, ultrasound imaging is expected to increase precision of radiofrequency neurotomy due to the ability to localize the exact course of a facet joint supplying nerve. For practitioners with only little experience in cervical sonoanatomy, we recommend performing ultrasound-guided cervical medial branch blocks with parallel fluoroscopic control first till one gains more experience. Correct level determination with ultrasound as described may be difficult for beginners, and the parallel use of fluoroscopy will help developing a “feel” for the procedure.

Systematic Review of the Therapeutic Effectiveness of Cervical Facet Joint Interventions: An Update

10.36076/ppj.2012/15/e839 ◽

2012 ◽

Vol 6;15 (6;12) ◽

pp. E839-E868 ◽

Cited By ~ 5

Author(s):

Frank J.E. Falco

Keyword(s):

Systematic Review ◽

Neck Pain ◽

Joint Pain ◽

Observational Studies ◽

Facet Joint ◽

Medial Branch ◽

Facet Joint Interventions ◽

Cervical Facet ◽

Background: The prevalence of chronic, recurrent neck pain is approximately 15% of the adult general population. Controlled studies have supported the existence of cervical facet or zygapophysial joint pain in 36% to 67% of these patients, when disc herniation, radiculitis, and discogenic are not pathognomic. However, these studies also have shown false-positive results in 27% to 63% of the patients with a single diagnostic block. There is also a paucity of literature investigating therapeutic interventions of cervical facet joint pain. Study Design: Systematic review of therapeutic cervical facet joint interventions. Objective: To determine and update the clinical utility of therapeutic cervical facet joint interventions in the management of chronic neck pain. Methods: The available literature for utility of facet joint interventions in therapeutic management of cervical facet joint pain was reviewed. The quality assessment and clinical relevance criteria utilized were the Cochrane Musculoskeletal Review Group criteria as utilized for interventional techniques for randomized trials and the criteria developed by the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale criteria for observational studies. The level of evidence was classified as good, fair, and limited or poor based on the quality of evidence developed by the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF). Data sources included relevant literature identified through searches of PubMed and EMBASE from 1966 to June 2012, and manual searches of the bibliographies of known primary and review articles. Outcome Measures: The primary outcome measure was pain relief (short-term relief = up to 6 months and long-term > 6 months). Secondary outcome measures were improvement in functional status, psychological status, return to work, and reduction in opioid intake. Results: In this systematic review, 32 manuscripts were considered for inclusion. For final analysis, 4 randomized trials and 6 observational studies met the inclusion criteria and were included in the evidence synthesis. Based on one randomized, sham-controlled, double-blind trial and 5 observational studies, the indicated evidence for cervical radiofrequency neurotomy is fair. Based on one randomized, double-blind, active-controlled trial and one prospective evaluation, the indicated evidence for cervical medial branch blocks is fair. Based on 2 randomized controlled trials, the evidence for cervical intraarticular injections is limited. Limitations: Paucity of the overall published literature and specifically lack of literature for intraarticular cervical facet joint injections. Conclusions: The indicated evidence for cervical radiofrequency neurotomy is fair. The indicated evidence for cervical medial branch blocks is fair. The indicated evidence for cervical intraarticular injections with local anesthetic and steroids is limited. Key words: Chronic neck pain, cervical facet or zygapophysial joint pain, cervical medial branch blocks, cervical radiofrequency neurotomy, cervical intraarticular facet joint injections

Complications of Fluoroscopically Directed Facet Joint Nerve Blocks: A Prospective Evaluation of 7,500 Episodes with 43,000 Nerve Blocks

10.36076/ppj.2012/15/e143 ◽

2012 ◽

Vol 2;15 (2;3) ◽

pp. E143-E150 ◽

Cited By ~ 4

Author(s):

Laxmaiah Manchikanti

Keyword(s):

Ambulatory Surgery ◽

Facet Joint ◽

Spinal Pain ◽

Cervical Region ◽

Medial Branch ◽

Lumbar Region ◽

Thoracic Region ◽

Nerve Blocks ◽

Surgery Center ◽

Chronic Spinal Pain

Background: Chronic spinal pain is common along with numerous modalities of diagnostic and therapeutic interventions utilized, creating a health care crisis. Facet joint injections and epidural injections are the 2 most commonly utilized interventions in managing chronic spinal pain. While the literature addressing the effectiveness of facet joint nerve blocks is variable and emerging, there is paucity of literature on adverse effects of facet joint nerve blocks. Study Design: A prospective, non-randomized study of patients undergoing interventional techniques from May 2008 to December 2009. Setting: A private interventional pain management practice, a specialty referral center in the United States. Objectives: Investigation of the incidence in characteristics of adverse effects and complications of facet joint nerve blocks. The study was carried out over a period of 20 months including almost 7,500 episodes of 43,000 facet joint nerve blocks with 3,370 episodes in the cervical region, 3,162 in the lumbar region, and 950 in the thoracic region. All facet joint nerve blocks were performed under fluoroscopic guidance in an ambulatory surgery center by 3 physicians. The complications encountered during the procedure and postoperatively were evaluated prospectively. Methods: This study was carried out over a period of 20 months and included over 7,500 episodes or 43,000 facet joint nerve blocks. All of the interventions were performed under fluoroscopic guidance in an ambulatory surgery center by one of 3 physicians. The complications encountered during the procedure and postoperatively were prospectively evaluated. Outcomes Assessment: Measurable outcomes employed were intravascular entry of the needle, profuse bleeding, local hematoma, dural puncture and headache, nerve root or spinal cord irritation with resultant injury, and infectious complications. Results: There were no major complications. Multiple side effects and complications observed included overall intravascular penetration in 11.4% of episodes with 20% in cervical region, 4% in lumbar region, and 6% in thoracic region; local bleeding in 76.3% of episodes with highest in thoracic region and lowest in cervical region; oozing with 19.6% encounters with highest in cervical region and lowest in lumbar region; with local hematoma seen only in 1.2% of the patients with profuse bleeding, bruising, soreness, nerve root irritation, and all other effects such as vasovagal reactions observed in 1% or less of the episodes. Limitations: Limitations of this study include lack of contrast injection, use of intermittent fluoroscopy and also an observational nature of the study. Conclusion: This study illustrate that major complications are extremely rare and minor side effects are common. Key words: Spinal pain, facet joint nerve blocks, cervical medial branch or facet joint nerve blocks, thoracic medial branch or facet joint nerve blocks, lumbar facet joint nerve blocks, L5 dorsal ramus block complications

An Update of Evaluation of Therapeutic Thoracic Facet Joint Interventions

10.36076/ppj.2012/15/e463 ◽

2012 ◽

Vol 4;15 (4;8) ◽

pp. E463-E481

Author(s):

Frank J.E. Falco

Keyword(s):

Systematic Review ◽

Back Pain ◽

Quality Assessment ◽

Joint Pain ◽

Facet Joint ◽

Medial Branch ◽

Facet Joints ◽

Nerve Blocks ◽

Facet Joint Interventions

Background: Chronic mid back and upper back pain caused by thoracic facet joints has been reported in 34% to 48% of patients based on responses to controlled diagnostic blocks. Systematic reviews have established moderate evidence for controlled comparative local anesthetic blocks of thoracic facet joints in the diagnosis of mid back and upper back pain, moderate evidence for therapeutic thoracic medial branch blocks, and limited evidence for radiofrequency neurotomy of thoracic medial branches. Study Design: Systematic review of therapeutic thoracic facet joint interventions. Objective: To determine the clinical utility of therapeutic thoracic facet joint interventions in the therapeutic management of chronic upper back and mid back pain. Methods: The available literature for the utility of facet joint interventions in the therapeutic management of thoracic facet joint pain was reviewed. The quality assessment and clinical relevance criteria utilized were the Cochrane Musculoskeletal Review Group criteria as utilized for interventional techniques for randomized trials and the criteria developed by the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale criteria for observational studies. The level of evidence was classified as good, fair, and limited (or poor) based on the quality of evidence developed by the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF). Data sources included relevant literature identified through searches of PubMed and EMBASE from 1966 to March 2012, and manual searches of the bibliographies of known primary and review articles. Outcome Measures: The primary outcome measure was pain relief (short-term relief = up to 6 months and long-term > 6 months). Secondary outcome measures were improvement in functional status, psychological status, return to work, and reduction in opioid intake. Results: For this systematic review, 13 studies were identified. Of these, 7 studies were excluded, and a total of 4 studies (after removal of duplicate publication) met inclusion criteria for methodological quality assessment with one randomized trial and 3 non-randomized studies. The evidence is fair for therapeutic thoracic facet joint nerve blocks, limited for thoracic radiofrequency neurotomy, and not available for thoracic intraarticular injections. Limitations: The limitation of this systematic review includes a paucity of literature. The only positive studies were of medial branch blocks performed by the same group of authors. Conclusion: The evidence for therapeutic facet joint interventions is fair for medial branch blocks, whereas it is not available for intraarticular injections, and limited for radiofrequency neurotomy due to lack of literature. Key words: Chronic thoracic pain, mid back or upper back pain, thoracic facet or zygapophysial joint pain, facet joint nerve blocks, medial branch blocks, therapeutic thoracic medial branch blocks, thoracic radiofrequency neurotomy, thoracic intraarticular facet joint injections

Systematic Review of Diagnostic Utility and Therapeutic Effectiveness of Cervical Facet Joint Interventions

10.36076/ppj.2009/12/323 ◽

2009 ◽

Vol 2;12 (2;3) ◽

pp. 323-344 ◽

Cited By ~ 9

Author(s):

Frank Falco

Keyword(s):

Local Anesthetic ◽

Joint Pain ◽

Facet Joint ◽

Medial Branch ◽

Level Ii ◽

Facet Joint Pain ◽

Facet Joint Interventions ◽

Cervical Facet ◽

Background: Chronic, recurrent neck pain is common and is associated with high pain intensity and disability, which is seen in 14% of the adult general population. Controlled studies have supported the existence of cervical facet or zygapophysial joint pain in 36% to 67% of these patients. However, these studies also have shown false-positive results in 27% to 63% of the patients with a single diagnostic block. There is also a paucity of literature investigating therapeutic interventions of cervical facet joint pain. Study Design: A systematic review of cervical facet joint interventions. Objective: To evaluate the accuracy of diagnostic facet joint nerve blocks and the effectiveness of cervical facet joint interventions. Methods: Medical databases and journals were searched to locate all relevant literature from 1966 through December 2008 in the English language. A review of the literature of the utility of facet joint interventions in diagnosing and managing facet joint pain was performed according to the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) criteria for diagnostic studies and observational studies and the Cochrane Musculoskeletal Review Group criteria as utilized for interventional techniques for randomized trials. Level of Evidence: The level of evidence was defined as Level I, II, or III based on the quality of evidence developed by the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF). Outcome Measures: For diagnostic interventions, studies must have been performed utilizing controlled local anesthetic blocks which achieve at minimum 80% relief of pain and the ability to perform previously painful movements. For therapeutic interventions, the primary outcome measure was pain relief (short-term relief up to 6 months and long-term relief greater than 6 months) with secondary outcome measures of improvement in functional status, psychological status, return to work, and reduction in opioid intake. Results: Based on the utilization of controlled comparative local anesthetic blocks, the evidence for the diagnosis of cervical facet joint pain is Level I or II-1. The indicated evidence for therapeutic cervical medial branch blocks is Level II-1. The indicated evidence for radiofrequency neurotomy in the cervical spine is Level II-1 or II-2, whereas the evidence is lacking for intraarticular injections. Limitations: A systematic review of cervical facet joint interventions is hindered by the paucity of published literature and lack of literature for intraarticular cervical facet joint injections. Conclusions: The evidence for diagnosis of cervical facet joint pain with controlled comparative local anesthetic blocks is Level I or II-1. The indicated evidence for therapeutic facet joint interventions is Level II-1 for medial branch blocks, and Level II-1 or II-2 for radiofrequency neurotomy. Key words: Chronic neck pain, cervical facet or zygapophysial joint pain, cervical medial branch blocks, controlled comparative local anesthetic blocks, cervical radiofrequency neurotomy, cervical intraarticular facet joint injections

The Benefit of Therapeutic Medial Branch Blocks after Cervical Operations

10.36076/ppj.2010/13/527 ◽

2010 ◽

Vol 6;13 (6;12) ◽

pp. 527-534

Author(s):

Stephan Klessinger

Keyword(s):

Cervical Spine ◽

Neck Pain ◽

Joint Pain ◽

Facet Joint ◽

Medial Branch ◽

Level Of Evidence ◽

Nerve Blocks ◽

Medial Branch Block ◽

Cervical Facet ◽

Background: Persistent neck pain is a common problem after surgery of the cervical spine. No therapy recommendation exists for these patients. Objectives: The objective of this study was to determine if a therapeutic medial branch block is a rational treatment for patients with postoperative neck pain after cervical spine operations. Study Design: Retrospective practice audit. Setting: Review of charts of all patients who underwent cervical spine operations for degenerative reasons during a time period of 3 years. Methods: Patients with persistent postsurgical pain were treated with therapeutic medial branch blocks (local anesthetic and steroid). A positive treatment response was defined if at least 80% reduction of pain could be achieved or if the patient was sufficiently satisfied with the relief. All patients with a minimum follow up time of 6 month were included. Results: Of the 312 operations performed, 128 were artificial disc operations, 125 were stand alone cages, and 59 were fusions with cage and plate. Persistent neck pain occurred in 33.3 % of the patients. There was no difference between the patients with neck pain and the whole group of patients. More than half of the patients with neck pain—52.9%—were treated successfully with therapeutic medial branch blocks. Since no further treatment was necessary, the initial treatment was considered successful. Nearly a third—32.2%—of the patients were initially treated successfully, but their pain recurred and further diagnostics and treatments were necessary. In this group of patients, significantly more with double level operations were found (P = 0.003). Patients not responding to the medial branch block were 14.9%. Limitations: This audit is retrospective and observational, and therefore does not represent a high level of evidence. However, to our knowledge, since this information has not been previously reported and no recommendation for the treatment of post-operative zygapophysial joint pain exists, it appears to be the best available research upon which to recommend treatment and to plan higher quality studies. Conclusions: For persistent postsurgical neck pain only limited therapy recommendations exist. This study suggests treating these patients in a first instance with therapeutic medial branch blocks. The success rate is 52.9 %. Key words: Chronic neck pain, cervical zygapophysial pain, cervical facet joint pain, medial branch blocks, therapeutical cervical facet joint nerve blocks, postsurgery syndrome, pain therapy Pain Physician

Randomized Study Assessing the Accuracy of Cervical Facet Joint Nerve (Medial Branch) Blocks Using Different Injectate Volumes

Anesthesiology ◽

10.1097/aln.0b013e3181c38a82 ◽

2010 ◽

Vol 112 (1) ◽

pp. 144-152 ◽

Cited By ~ 32

Author(s):

Steven P. Cohen ◽

Scott A. Strassels ◽

Connie Kurihara ◽

Akara Forsythe ◽

Chester C. Buckenmaier ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Facet Joint ◽

False Positive Rate ◽

Randomized Study ◽

Lateral Approach ◽

Medial Branch ◽

Nerve Blocks ◽

Significant Difference ◽

Facet Joint Pain ◽

Cervical Facet ◽

Background Neck pain is a frequent cause of disability, with facet joint arthropathy accounting for a large percentage of cases. The diagnosis of cervical facet joint pain is usually made with diagnostic blocks of the nerves that innervate them. Yet, medial branch blocks are associated with a high false-positive rate. One hypothesized cause of inaccurate diagnostic blocks is inadvertent extravasation of injectate into adjacent pain-generating structures. The objective of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of medial branch blocks by using different injectate volumes. Methods Twenty-four patients received cervical medial branch blocks, using either 0.5 or 0.25 ml of bupivacaine mixed with contrast. One half of the patients in each group were suballocated to receive the blocks in the prone position and the other half through a lateral approach. Participants then underwent computed tomography of the cervical spine to evaluate accuracy and patterns of aberrant contrast spread. Results Sixteen instances of aberrant spread were observed in nine patients receiving blocks using 0.5 ml versus seven occurrences in six patients in the 0.25 ml group (P = 0.07). Aberrant spread was most commonly observed (57%) when an injection at C3 engulfed the third occipital nerve. Among the 86 nerve blocks, foraminal spread occurred in five instances using 0.5 ml and in two cases with 0.25 ml. The six "missed" nerves were equally divided between treatment groups. No significant difference in any outcome measure was observed between the prone and lateral positions. Conclusions Reducing the volume during cervical medial branch blocks may improve precision and accuracy.

Cervical Facet Nerve Block and Radio Frequency Ablation: Fluoroscopy

10.1093/med/9780199908004.003.0007 ◽

2016 ◽

Author(s):

Maarten van Eerd ◽

Arno Lataster ◽

Maarten van Kleef

Keyword(s):

Local Anesthetic ◽

Facet Joint ◽

Spinal Column ◽

Medial Branch ◽

Nerve Blocks ◽

Steroid Injections ◽

Track Record ◽

Segmental Nerve ◽

Ramus Medialis ◽

Cervical Facet

In the cervical spinal column local anesthetic can be injected intra-articularly or adjacent to the ramus medialis (medial branch) of the ramus dorsalis of the segmental nerve. Nerve blocks of the ramus medialis are preferred to an intra-articular block, because it is sometimes technically difficult to position a needle into the facet joint. These procedures are typically performed under fluoroscopy, but there are increasing numbers of studies that describe these procedures with the help of ultrasound. Reports regarding the effects of intra-articular (steroid) injections are limited. There are no comparative studies between intra-articular steroid injections and radiofrequency (RF) therapy. Based on literature about the efficacy of RF treatment and a long track record of safety of RF treatment, many pain practitioners abandon intra-articular injections in favor of RF treatment.

An Updated Review of the Diagnostic Utility of Cervical Facet Joint Injections

10.36076/ppj.2012/15/e807 ◽

2012 ◽

Vol 6;15 (6;12) ◽

pp. E807-E838

Author(s):

Sukdeb Datta

Keyword(s):

Pain Relief ◽

Neck Pain ◽

Diagnostic Accuracy ◽

Joint Pain ◽

Facet Joint ◽

Chronic Neck Pain ◽

Nerve Blocks ◽

Facet Joint Pain ◽

Cervical Facet ◽

Background: Chronic persistent neck pain with or without upper extremity pain is common in the general adult population with a prevalence of 48% for women and 38% for men, with persistent complaints in 22% of women and 16% of men. Multiple modalities of treatment are exploding in managing chronic neck pain along with increasing prevalence. However, there is a paucity of evidence for all modalities of treatments in managing chronic neck pain. Controlled studies have supported the existence of cervical facet or zygapophysial joint pain in 36% to 60% in heterogenous population of these patients. However, these studies also have shown false-positive results in 27% to 63% of patients with a single diagnostic block. Study Design: A systematic review of diagnostic cervical facet joint nerve blocks. Objective: To evaluate and update the accuracy of diagnostic facet joint nerve blocks in the diagnosis of facet joint pain. Methods: A methodological quality assessment of included studies was performed using Quality Appraisal of Reliability Studies (QAREL). Only diagnostic accuracy studies meeting at least 50% of the designated inclusion criteria were utilized for analysis. Studies scoring less than 50% are presented descriptively and critically analyzed. The level of evidence was classified as good, fair, and limited or poor based on the quality of evidence developed by the United States Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF). Data sources included relevant literature identified through searches of PubMed and EMBASE from 1966 to June 2012, and manual searches of the bibliographies of known primary and review articles. Results: Overall, a total of 26 manuscripts were considered for diagnostic accuracy evaluation and 9 manuscripts for studies evaluating various factors influencing the diagnostic validity of facet joint interventions. Based on 9 studies meeting the inclusion criteria utilizing 75% to 100% pain relief as the criterion standard with controlled blocks, the evidence is good for diagnostic accuracy of cervical facet joint pain, with a prevalence of 36% to 60% with a false-positive rate of 27% to 63% with a single block. Based on 2 studies from the same group of authors, the evidence for 75% to 100% pain relief as the criterion standard with a single block is limited. The evidence is limited for a single diagnostic block with 50% to 74% pain relief as the criterion standard, whereas no studies were available assessing the accuracy of 50% to 74% pain relief as the criterion standard with controlled blocks. Limitations: The limitations of this systematic review include a paucity of literature on outcomes, randomized, placebo-controlled trials and a lack of consensus on a gold standard. Conclusions: Diagnostic cervical facet joint nerve blocks are safe, valid, and reliable. The strength of evidence for diagnostic facet joint nerve blocks is good with the utilization of controlled diagnostic blocks with at least 75% pain relief as the criterion standard; however, the evidence is limited for single blocks or dual blocks for relief of 50% to 74% and single blocks with at least 75% pain relief. Key words: Chronic neck pain, cervical facet or zygapophysial joint pain, cervical medial branch blocks, controlled comparative local anesthetic blocks

Comparative Outcomes of a 2-Year Follow-Up of Cervical Medial Branch Blocks in Management of Chronic Neck Pain: A Randomized, Double-Blind Controlled Trial

10.36076/ppj.2010/13/437 ◽

2010 ◽

Vol 5;13 (5;9) ◽

pp. 437-450 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Laxmaiah Manchikanti

Keyword(s):

Pain Relief ◽

Neck Pain ◽

Local Anesthetic ◽

Facet Joint ◽

Neck Disability Index ◽

Chronic Neck Pain ◽

Medial Branch ◽

Group I ◽

Cervical Facet ◽

Background: Cervical therapeutic intraarticular facet joint injections, therapeutic medial branch blocks, and radiofrequency neurotomy have been applied in managing chronic neck pain of cervical facet joint origin. However, the effectiveness of these modalities continues to be debated. The purpose of this study was to determine the clinical effectiveness of therapeutic cervical medial branch blocks with or without steroids. Study Design: A randomized, double-blind, controlled trial. Setting: An interventional pain management practice, a specialty referral center, a private practice setting in the United States. Objective: To evaluate the clinical outcomes of therapeutic cervical medial branch blocks with local anesthetic with or without steroids in managing chronic neck pain of facet joint origin. Methods: A total of 120 patients meeting inclusion criteria were included. All of the patients met the diagnostic criteria of cervical facet joint pain by means of comparative, controlled diagnostic blocks, with at least 80% relief. Group I consisted of cervical medial branch blocks with bupivacaine only and Group II consisted of cervical medial branch blocks with bupivacaine and steroid. Therapeutic cervical medial branch blocks with local anesthetic with or without steroids were administered. Main outcome measures included numeric pain scores, Neck Disability Index (NDI), opioid intake, and work status evaluated at baseline, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months. The one-year results of outcomes were published in 2008. This manuscript describes the 2-year results. Significant improvement was defined as at least 50% improvement in pain relief and/or functional status improvement. Outcomes Assessment: Patient outcomes were measured at baseline, 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months post-treatment with the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS), the Neck Disability Index (NDI), employment status, and opioid intake. Decrease of ≥ 50% of NRS scores and Oswestry scores were considered significant. Results: Eighty-five percent of patients in Group I and 93% of patients in Group II showed significant pain relief (≥ 50%) at 2 years. The average number of treatments for 2 years was 5.7. The duration of average pain relief with each procedure was 17-19 weeks on average in both groups. Significant improvement of pain and function was demonstrated for 83 to 89 weeks over a period of 2 years. Limitations: The study limitations include the lack of a placebo group. Conclusions: In this study, therapeutic cervical medial branch blocks instituted after the diagnosis, with controlled comparative local anesthetic blocks with 80% concordant pain relief, repeated approximately 6 times over a period of 2 years, provided significant improvement over a period of 2 years. Key words: Chronic neck pain, cervical facet or zygapophysial joint pain, facet joint nerve or medial branch blocks, comparative controlled local anesthetic blocks, therapeutic cervical facet joint nerve blocks