scholarly journals Response to letter regarding “Stereotactic radiosurgery for nonfunctioning pituitary adenomas: meta-analysis and International Society of Stereotactic Radiosurgery (ISRS) practice opinion”

2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (9) ◽  
pp. 1402-1403
Author(s):  
Rupesh Kotecha ◽  
Shoji Yomo ◽  
John H Suh
Neurosurgery ◽  
2003 ◽  
Vol 53 (5) ◽  
pp. 1086-1094 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bruce E. Pollock ◽  
Paul C. Carpenter

Abstract OBJECTIVE To evaluate tumor control rates and complications after stereotactic radiosurgery for patients with nonfunctioning pituitary adenomas. METHODS Between 1992 and 2000, 33 patients underwent radiosurgery for treatment of nonfunctioning pituitary adenomas. Thirty-two patients (97%) had undergone one or more previous tumor resections. Twenty-two patients (67%) had enlarging tumors before radiosurgery. The median tumor margin dose was 16 Gy (range, 12–20 Gy). The median follow-up period after radiosurgery was 43 months (range, 16–106 mo). RESULTS Tumor size decreased for 16 patients, remained unchanged for 16 patients, and increased for 1 patient. The actuarial tumor growth control rates at 2 and 5 years after radiosurgery were 97%. No patient demonstrated any decline in visual function. Five of 18 patients (28%) with anterior pituitary function before radiosurgery developed new deficits, at a median of 24 months after radiosurgery. The actuarial risks of developing new anterior pituitary deficits were 18 and 41% at 2 and 5 years, respectively. No patient developed diabetes insipidus. CONCLUSION Stereotactic radiosurgery safely provides a high tumor control rate for patients with recurrent or residual nonfunctioning pituitary adenomas. However, despite encouraging early results, more long-term information is needed to determine whether radiosurgery is associated with lower risks of new endocrine deficits and radiation-induced neoplasms, compared with fractionated radiotherapy.


2010 ◽  
Vol 73 (6) ◽  
pp. 777-791 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohammad Hassan Murad ◽  
M. M. Fernández-Balsells ◽  
Amelia Barwise ◽  
Juan F. Gallegos-Orozco ◽  
Anu Paul ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 96 (4) ◽  
pp. 333-342 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yong Chen ◽  
Cheng De Wang ◽  
Zhi Peng Su ◽  
Yun Xiang Chen ◽  
Lin Cai ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 22 (3) ◽  
pp. 318-332 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rupesh Kotecha ◽  
Arjun Sahgal ◽  
Muni Rubens ◽  
Antonio De Salles ◽  
Laura Fariselli ◽  
...  

Abstract Background This systematic review reports on outcomes and toxicities following stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for non-functioning pituitary adenomas (NFAs) and presents consensus opinions regarding appropriate patient management. Methods Using the guidelines of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses, a systematic review was performed from articles of ≥10 patients with NFAs published prior to May 2018 from the Medline database using the key words “radiosurgery” and “pituitary” and/or “adenoma.” Weighted random effects models were used to calculate pooled outcome estimates. Results Of the 678 abstracts reviewed, 35 full-text articles were included describing the outcomes of 2671 patients treated between 1971 and 2017 with either single fraction SRS or hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (HSRT). All studies were retrospective (level IV evidence). SRS was used in 27 studies (median dose: 15 Gy, range: 5–35 Gy) and HSRT in 8 studies (median total dose: 21 Gy, range: 12–25 Gy, delivered in 3–5 fractions). The 5-year random effects local control estimate after SRS was 94% (95% CI: 93.0–96.0%) and 97.0% (95% CI: 93.0–98.0%) after HSRT. The 10-year local control random effects estimate after SRS was 83.0% (95% CI: 77.0–88.0%). Post-SRS hypopituitarism was the most common treatment-related toxicity observed, with a random effects estimate of 21.0% (95% CI: 15.0–27.0%), whereas visual dysfunction or other cranial nerve injuries were uncommon (range: 0–7%). Conclusions SRS is an effective and safe treatment for patients with NFAs. Encouraging short-term data support HSRT for select patients, and mature outcomes are needed before definitive recommendations can be made. Clinical practice opinions were developed on behalf of the International Stereotactic Radiosurgery Society (ISRS).


2003 ◽  
Vol 88 (11) ◽  
pp. 5334-5340 ◽  
Author(s):  
F. M. Swords ◽  
C. A. Allan ◽  
P. N. Plowman ◽  
A. Sibtain ◽  
J. Evanson ◽  
...  

Abstract We report the use of stereotactic radiosurgery delivered through an adapted linear accelerator [stereotactic multiple arc radiation therapy (SMART)] for pituitary adenomas not cured by conventional therapy. All 21 patients had undergone conventional radiotherapy (45–50 Gy); 18 had also undergone prior surgery. This cohort comprised 13 patients with somatotrope adenomas, four with corticotrope adenomas, one with a lactotrope adenoma, and three with nonfunctioning pituitary adenomas (median follow-up: 33 months, range: 3–72 months). SMART has proven effective, safe, and rapidly acting. We observed an accelerated reduction in GH and IGF-I levels in acromegaly, with normalization of GH and IGF-I levels in 58%. Mean GH fell from 21.1 mU/liter to 7.9 mU/liter (7 ng/ml to 2.6 ng/ml, P < 0.01, median 25 months) faster than our predicted fall to 50% at 2 yr with conventional radiotherapy. Mean IGF-I fell from 624 ng/ml to 384 ng/ml (P < 0.001). Tumor growth was controlled in two of three nonfunctioning pituitary adenomas, and three of four corticotrope adenomas. There were no adverse effects from SMART. Notably there have been no visual sequelae or further loss of anterior pituitary function in this heavily pretreated group. Our data indicate that SMART is an effective complementary therapy for pituitary adenomas that have displayed a suboptimal response to conventional therapy including external irradiation.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document