Stereotactic Radiosurgery as an Alternative to Fractionated Radiotherapy for Patients with Recurrent or Residual Nonfunctioning Pituitary Adenomas

Neurosurgery ◽  
2003 ◽  
Vol 53 (5) ◽  
pp. 1086-1094 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bruce E. Pollock ◽  
Paul C. Carpenter

Abstract OBJECTIVE To evaluate tumor control rates and complications after stereotactic radiosurgery for patients with nonfunctioning pituitary adenomas. METHODS Between 1992 and 2000, 33 patients underwent radiosurgery for treatment of nonfunctioning pituitary adenomas. Thirty-two patients (97%) had undergone one or more previous tumor resections. Twenty-two patients (67%) had enlarging tumors before radiosurgery. The median tumor margin dose was 16 Gy (range, 12–20 Gy). The median follow-up period after radiosurgery was 43 months (range, 16–106 mo). RESULTS Tumor size decreased for 16 patients, remained unchanged for 16 patients, and increased for 1 patient. The actuarial tumor growth control rates at 2 and 5 years after radiosurgery were 97%. No patient demonstrated any decline in visual function. Five of 18 patients (28%) with anterior pituitary function before radiosurgery developed new deficits, at a median of 24 months after radiosurgery. The actuarial risks of developing new anterior pituitary deficits were 18 and 41% at 2 and 5 years, respectively. No patient developed diabetes insipidus. CONCLUSION Stereotactic radiosurgery safely provides a high tumor control rate for patients with recurrent or residual nonfunctioning pituitary adenomas. However, despite encouraging early results, more long-term information is needed to determine whether radiosurgery is associated with lower risks of new endocrine deficits and radiation-induced neoplasms, compared with fractionated radiotherapy.

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Natasha Ironside ◽  
Harrison Snyder ◽  
Zhiyuan Xu ◽  
David Schlesinger ◽  
Ching-Jen Chen ◽  
...  

Abstract IntroductionDelayed hypopituitarism is the most common complication after stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for pituitary adenomas. The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between the distance from the hypothalamic-pituitary axis to the treatment target and anterior pituitary function preservation after SRS. MethodsBetween 2007 and 2020, consecutive adult patients who underwent single-session SRS for pituitary adenomas with ³6 months of follow-up were included. Distance measurements between hypothalamic-pituitary axis structures and the SRS target volume were quantified on MRI. The primary outcome was anterior pituitary function preservation. Outcomes were compared using multivariable regression and area under the receiver operator characteristic curve (AUROC) analyses. ResultsThe study cohort comprised 224 patients, who were categorized by preservation (n=168) and no preservation (n=56) of anterior pituitary function after SRS. Independent predictors of anterior pituitary function preservation were a greater distance between the center of the pituitary gland and center of the SRS target (OR=1.101 [1.000–1.213], p=0.050), and a shorter clinical follow-up duration (OR=0.985 [0.977–0.993], p<0.0001). The adjusted AUROC for the distance from the center of the pituitary gland and center of the SRS target in predicting anterior pituitary function preservation was 0.595. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value in predicting anterior pituitary function preservation at the optimal cut-off distance of 15mm were 30.0%, 88.0%, 89.9% and 26.2%, respectively.ConclusionsGreater distance between the normal pituitary gland and the SRS target is associated with anterior pituitary function preservation and increasing this distance should be a goal of adenoma resection. Larger prospective, multi-center studies are necessary to corroborate this finding and establish the effects of distance on hypopituitarism after SRS for pituitary adenomas.


2005 ◽  
Vol 102 (4) ◽  
pp. 678-691 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jason P. Sheehan ◽  
Ajay Niranjan ◽  
Jonas M. Sheehan ◽  
John A. Jane ◽  
Edward R. Laws ◽  
...  

Object. Pituitary adenomas are very common neoplasms, constituting between 10 and 20% of all primary brain tumors. Historically, the treatment armamentarium for pituitary adenomas has included medical management, microsurgery, and fractionated radiotherapy. More recently, radiosurgery has emerged as a viable treatment option. The goal of this research was to define more fully the efficacy, safety, and role of radiosurgery in the treatment of pituitary adenomas. Methods. Medical literature databases were searched for articles pertaining to pituitary adenomas and stereotactic radiosurgery. Each study was examined to determine the number of patients, radiosurgical parameters (for example, maximal dose and tumor margin dose), duration of follow-up review, tumor growth control rate, complications, and rate of hormone normalization in the case of functioning adenomas. A total of 35 peer-reviewed studies involving 1621 patients were examined. Radiosurgery resulted in the control of tumor size in approximately 90% of treated patients. The reported rates of hormone normalization for functioning adenomas varied substantially. This was due in part to widespread differences in endocrinological criteria used for the postradiosurgical assessment. The risks of hypopituitarism, radiation-induced neoplasia, and cerebral vasculopathy associated with radiosurgery appeared lower than those for fractionated radiation therapy. Nevertheless, further observation will be required to understand the true probabilities. The incidence of other serious complications following radiosurgery was quite low. Conclusions. Although microsurgery remains the primary treatment modality in most cases, stereotactic radiosurgery offers both safe and effective treatment for recurrent or residual pituitary adenomas. In rare instances, radiosurgery may be the best initial treatment for patients with pituitary adenomas. Further refinements in the radiosurgical technique will likely lead to improved outcomes.


2006 ◽  
Vol 105 (Supplement) ◽  
pp. 26-30 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mooseong Kim ◽  
Sunghwa Paeng ◽  
Seyoung Pyo ◽  
Yeonggyun Jeong ◽  
Sunil Lee ◽  
...  

ObjectPituitary adenomas have been treated using a variety of modalities including resection, medication, fractionated radiotherapy, and stereotactic radiosurgery. The policy has been that all adenomas should first be treated with resection to reduce the volume of the tumor. The authors' study was conducted to determine the efficacy of using Gamma Knife surgery (GKS) for pituitary adenomas invading the cavernous sinus.MethodsOf 397 patients with pituitary tumors who underwent GKS between October 1994 and October 2005, 68 patients had pituitary macroadenomas invading the cavernous sinus. Sixty-seven cases were available for follow up. The mean age of the patients in these cases was 42.8 years (range 14–73 years). The male/female ratio was 0.8:1. The mean adenoma volume was 9.3 cm3. A total of 24 patients had undergone craniotomies and resection, and 11 patients had undergone transsphenoidal surgery prior to GKS. The mean follow-up period was 32.8 months. Tumor control was defined as a decrease or no change in tumor volume after GKS. Endocrinological improvement was defined as a decline in hormone levels to below 50% of the pre-GKS level.Tumor control was achieved in 95.5% of the cases. Endocrinological improvement was achieved in 68% of 25 patients. One patient suffered hypopituitarism after GKS.Conclusions Gamma Knife surgery is a safe and effective treatment for invasive pituitary macroadenoma with few complications.


2021 ◽  
pp. 1-9
Author(s):  
I. Jonathan Pomeraniec ◽  
Zhiyuan Xu ◽  
Cheng-Chia Lee ◽  
Huai-Che Yang ◽  
Tomas Chytka ◽  
...  

OBJECTIVE Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) provides a safe and effective therapeutic modality for patients with pituitary adenomas. The mechanism of delayed endocrine deficits based on targeted radiation to the hypothalamic-pituitary axis remains unclear. Radiation to normal neuroendocrine structures likely plays a role in delayed hypopituitarism after SRS. In this multicenter study by the International Radiosurgery Research Foundation (IRRF), the authors aimed to evaluate radiation tolerance of structures surrounding pituitary adenomas and identify predictors of delayed hypopituitarism after SRS for these tumors. METHODS This is a retrospective review of patients with pituitary adenomas who underwent single-fraction SRS from 1997 to 2019 at 16 institutions within the IRRF. Dosimetric point measurements of 14 predefined neuroanatomical structures along the hypothalamus, pituitary stalk, and normal pituitary gland were made. Statistical analyses were performed to determine the impact of doses to critical structures on clinical, radiographic, and endocrine outcomes. RESULTS The study cohort comprised 521 pituitary adenomas treated with SRS. Tumor control was achieved in 93.9% of patients over a median follow-up period of 60.1 months, and 22.5% of patients developed new loss of pituitary function with a median treatment volume of 3.2 cm3. Median maximal radiosurgical doses to the hypothalamus, pituitary stalk, and normal pituitary gland were 1.4, 7.2, and 11.3 Gy, respectively. Nonfunctioning adenoma status, younger age, higher margin dose, and higher doses to the pituitary stalk and normal pituitary gland were independent predictors of new or worsening hypopituitarism. Neither the dose to the hypothalamus nor the ratio between doses to the pituitary stalk and gland were significant predictors. The threshold of the median dose to the pituitary stalk for new endocrinopathy was 10.7 Gy in a single fraction (OR 1.77, 95% CI 1.17–2.68, p = 0.006). CONCLUSIONS SRS for the treatment of pituitary adenomas affords a high tumor control rate with an acceptable risk of new or worsening endocrinopathy. This evaluation of point dosimetry to adjacent neuroanatomical structures revealed that doses to the pituitary stalk, with a threshold of 10.7 Gy, and doses to the normal gland significantly increased the risk of post-SRS hypopituitarism. In patients with preserved pre-SRS neuroendocrine function, limiting the dose to the pituitary stalk and gland while still delivering an optimal dose to the tumor appears prudent.


Neurosurgery ◽  
2003 ◽  
Vol 52 (2) ◽  
pp. 309-317 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vilibald Vladyka ◽  
Roman Liščák ◽  
Josef Novotný ◽  
Josef Marek ◽  
Jana Ježková

Abstract OBJECTIVE This study is intended to contribute to a determination of the sensitivity of preserved hypophyseal function to focal radiation in pituitary adenomas. METHODS We compared two subgroups of patients followed up for a median of 5 years after gamma knife surgery (GKS). Subgroup 1 (n = 30) showed postirradiation hypopituitarism. Subgroup 2 (n = 33) was continually eupituitary. These subgroups were taken from a previously published study relating to a larger group of 163 patients with pituitary adenomas treated by GKS and evaluated after a median follow-up period of 2 years. A relatively high treatment dose was used in this larger group (median, 20 Gy to the tumor margin for growth control in nonfunctioning adenomas; median, 35 Gy for hypersecreting adenomas). Early results approached those of microsurgery, and there were only a few side effects. In the present study, we compared 16 different variables in the same two subgroups to discover the relationships that caused a delayed appearance of postirradiation hypopituitarism. The main pretreatment and treatment parameters were measured on reconstructed treatment plans. This database was used for statistical evaluation. RESULTS The relationship between the mean dose and the volume of functioning hypophysis was stronger in terms of worsening of pituitary function than that of the spot dose to different intrasellar structures. We found that for our group of patients, the safe mean dose of radiation to the hypophysis was 15 Gy for gonadotropic and thyrotropic functions and 18 Gy for adrenocorticotropic function. The worsening of pituitary function was also significantly dependent on the dose to different anatomic levels of the infundibulum, but we did not succeed in fully characterizing this relationship. In addition, we discovered significant levels of dependency of postirradiation pituitary damage to different pretreatment and treatment variables. CONCLUSION Knowledge of the radiation tolerance of functioning pituitary structures subjected to GKS can ensure better preservation of pituitary function after irradiation. This is valid for the group of patients we studied. Our study's findings can be used as a guideline for GKS treatment of new patients with pituitary adenomas, and it can serve for comparison with the experience of other gamma knife centers.


2017 ◽  
Vol 159 (6) ◽  
pp. 1013-1021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Oscar Persson ◽  
Jiri Bartek ◽  
Netanel Ben Shalom ◽  
Theresa Wangerid ◽  
Asgeir Store Jakola ◽  
...  

Cancer ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 110 (4) ◽  
pp. 854-860 ◽  
Author(s):  
Doo-Sik Kong ◽  
Jung-Il Lee ◽  
Do Hoon Lim ◽  
Kwang Won Kim ◽  
Hyung Jin Shin ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yanli Li ◽  
Lisha Wu ◽  
Tingting Quan ◽  
Junyi Fu ◽  
Linhui Cao ◽  
...  

ObjectiveThis study aimed to report the characteristic of tumor regrowth after gamma knife radiosurgery (GKRS) and outcomes of repeat GKRS in nonfunctioning pituitary adenomas (NFPAs).Design and MethodsThis retrospective study consisted of 369 NFPA patients treated with GKRS. The median age was 45.2 (range, 7.2–84.0) years. The median tumor volume was 3.5 (range, 0.1–44.3) cm3.ResultsTwenty-four patients (6.5%) were confirmed as regrowth after GKRS. The regrowth-free survivals were 100%, 98%, 97%, 86% and 77% at 1, 3, 5, 10 and 15 year, respectively. In multivariate analysis, parasellar invasion and margin dose (&lt;12 Gy) were associated with tumor regrowth (hazard ratio [HR] = 3.125, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.318–7.410, p = 0.010 and HR = 3.359, 95% CI = 1.347–8.379, p = 0.009, respectively). The median time of regrowth was 86.1 (range, 23.2–236.0) months. Previous surgery was associated with tumor regrowth out of field (p = 0.033). Twelve patients underwent repeat GKRS, including regrowth in (n = 8) and out of field (n = 4). Tumor shrunk in seven patients (58.3%), remained stable in one (8.3%) and regrowth in four (33.3%) with a median repeat GKRS margin dose of 12 (range, 10.0–14.0) Gy. The actuarial tumor control rates were 100%, 90%, 90%, 68%, and 68% at 1, 3, 5, 10, and 15 years after repeat GKRS, respectively.ConclusionsParasellar invasion and tumor margin dose (&lt;12 Gy) were independent risk factors for tumor regrowth after GKRS. Repeat GKRS might be effective on tumor control for selected patients. For regrowth in field due to relatively insufficient radiation dose, repeat GKRS might offer satisfactory tumor control. For regrowth out of field, preventing regrowth out of field was the key management. Sufficient target coverage and close follow-up might be helpful.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document