scholarly journals Discordance of SHEA/IDSA Clostridium difficile Disease Severity Scale in Solid Organ Transplant Patients

2017 ◽  
Vol 4 (suppl_1) ◽  
pp. S383-S383 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tiffany Lee ◽  
Christopher McCoy ◽  
Carolyn D Alonso ◽  
Graham M Snyder ◽  
Christin Rogers ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Solid organ transplant (SOT) patients are at high risk for Clostridium difficile infections (CDI) due to chronic immunosuppression and a propensity to receive antimicrobials. Management of CDI in SOT patients poses unique challenges as this population has disease-altered clinical and laboratory parameters. The objective of this study was to assess concordance between various CDI severity scales and the Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America/Infectious Diseases Society of America (SHEA/IDSA) guidelines. Methods This retrospective study included all SOT recipients with a first CDI episode following transplant and time-matched (2:1) to non-SOT patients experiencing first CDI episodes between 2008 and 2016. The primary endpoint was concordance rates of CDI episodes considered mild-moderate or severe/severe-complicated in published CDI scales compared with the SHEA/IDSA guidelines. We also sought to compare the distribution of CDI severity across all scales between SOT and non-SOT patients. Results Overall, 32 SOT patients and 64 non-SOT patients were included. The SOT group had significantly higher leukopenia rates at CDI diagnosis; however, the magnitude of serum creatinine change did not differ between groups. According to the SHEA/IDSA scale, CDI episodes in SOT recipients were categorized as mild-moderate and severe/severe-complicated in 23 (72%) and 9 (28%) patients, respectively. Overall concordance rates among SHEA/IDSA guidelines and other scales ranged from 28% to 72%. Concordance rates were highest for mild-moderate CDI with Belmares and for severe/severe-complicated CDI with ESCMID (Table 1). No scale evenly categorized SOT and non-SOT patients across all severities (Figure 1). Conclusion Severity scales with heavy emphasis on white blood cell counts may not adequately categorize SOT patients. Immunocompromised status may need to be considered on its own when categorizing CDI severity and prescribing therapy. Disclosures C. D. Alonso, Merck: Grant Investigator and Scientific Advisor, Research grant sanofi pasteur: Investigator and Scientific Advisor, Research support GSK: Investigator, Research support; E. B. Hirsch, Merck: Grant Investigator, Grant recipient The Medicines Company: Speaker’s Bureau, Speaker honorarium

2006 ◽  
Vol 101 ◽  
pp. S198
Author(s):  
Ziad F. Gellad ◽  
Barbara D. Alexander ◽  
Jesse K. Liu ◽  
Brian C. Griffith ◽  
Angela M. Meyer ◽  
...  

2007 ◽  
Vol 9 (4) ◽  
pp. 276-280 ◽  
Author(s):  
Z.F. Gellad ◽  
B.D. Alexander ◽  
J.K. Liu ◽  
B.C. Griffith ◽  
A.M. Meyer ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 45 (10) ◽  
pp. 3458-3461 ◽  
Author(s):  
F.Ö. Eyüboğlu ◽  
E. Küpeli ◽  
Ş.S. Bozbaş ◽  
Z.E. Özen ◽  
E.S. Akkurt ◽  
...  

2004 ◽  
Vol 47 (11) ◽  
pp. 1898-1903 ◽  
Author(s):  
Harry T. Papaconstantinou ◽  
Bradford Sklow ◽  
Michael J. Hanaway ◽  
Thomas G. Gross ◽  
Thomas M. Beebe ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 30 (4) ◽  
pp. 329-339 ◽  
Author(s):  
Esther Benamu ◽  
Cameron R. Wolfe ◽  
José G. Montoya

CHEST Journal ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 152 (4) ◽  
pp. A608
Author(s):  
Faisal Khateeb ◽  
Zaid Ammari ◽  
Aahd Kubbara ◽  
Yousef Abdel-Aziz ◽  
Fadi Safi

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document