scholarly journals Tacrolimus concentration to dose ratio in solid organ transplant patients treated with fecal microbiota transplantation for recurrent Clostridium difficile infection

2018 ◽  
Vol 20 (2) ◽  
pp. e12857 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael H. Woodworth ◽  
Colleen S. Kraft ◽  
Erika J. Meredith ◽  
Aneesh K. Mehta ◽  
Tiffany Wang ◽  
...  
2015 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 156-159 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohammad Bilal ◽  
Raman Khehra ◽  
Cristina Strahotin ◽  
Ricardo Mitre

Clostridium difficile infection is one of the most frequent causes of healthcare-associated infections, and its rates are also increasing in the community. Mounting evidence suggests that fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) may be effective; however, as there is paucity of data regarding the use of FMT in patients with solid organ transplants, we present a case of successful FMT in a patient with dual solid organ transplant.


Author(s):  
Nirja Mehta ◽  
Tiffany Wang ◽  
Rachel J. Friedman-Moraco ◽  
Cynthia Carpentieri ◽  
Aneesh K. Mehta ◽  
...  

In this review, we discuss stool donor screening considerations to mitigate potential risks of pathogen transmission through fecal microbiota transplant (FMT) in solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients. SOT recipients have a higher risk for Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) and are more likely to have severe CDI. FMT has been shown to be a valuable tool in the treatment of recurrent CDI (RCDI), however guidelines for screening for opportunistic infections transmitted through FMT are underdeveloped. We review reported adverse effects of FMT as they pertain to an immunocompromised population and discuss current understanding and recommendations for screening found in the literature while noting gaps in research. We conclude that while FMT is being performed in the SOT population, typically with positive results, there remain many unanswered questions which may have major safety implications and warrant further study.


2017 ◽  
Vol 4 (suppl_1) ◽  
pp. S383-S383 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tiffany Lee ◽  
Christopher McCoy ◽  
Carolyn D Alonso ◽  
Graham M Snyder ◽  
Christin Rogers ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Solid organ transplant (SOT) patients are at high risk for Clostridium difficile infections (CDI) due to chronic immunosuppression and a propensity to receive antimicrobials. Management of CDI in SOT patients poses unique challenges as this population has disease-altered clinical and laboratory parameters. The objective of this study was to assess concordance between various CDI severity scales and the Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America/Infectious Diseases Society of America (SHEA/IDSA) guidelines. Methods This retrospective study included all SOT recipients with a first CDI episode following transplant and time-matched (2:1) to non-SOT patients experiencing first CDI episodes between 2008 and 2016. The primary endpoint was concordance rates of CDI episodes considered mild-moderate or severe/severe-complicated in published CDI scales compared with the SHEA/IDSA guidelines. We also sought to compare the distribution of CDI severity across all scales between SOT and non-SOT patients. Results Overall, 32 SOT patients and 64 non-SOT patients were included. The SOT group had significantly higher leukopenia rates at CDI diagnosis; however, the magnitude of serum creatinine change did not differ between groups. According to the SHEA/IDSA scale, CDI episodes in SOT recipients were categorized as mild-moderate and severe/severe-complicated in 23 (72%) and 9 (28%) patients, respectively. Overall concordance rates among SHEA/IDSA guidelines and other scales ranged from 28% to 72%. Concordance rates were highest for mild-moderate CDI with Belmares and for severe/severe-complicated CDI with ESCMID (Table 1). No scale evenly categorized SOT and non-SOT patients across all severities (Figure 1). Conclusion Severity scales with heavy emphasis on white blood cell counts may not adequately categorize SOT patients. Immunocompromised status may need to be considered on its own when categorizing CDI severity and prescribing therapy. Disclosures C. D. Alonso, Merck: Grant Investigator and Scientific Advisor, Research grant sanofi pasteur: Investigator and Scientific Advisor, Research support GSK: Investigator, Research support; E. B. Hirsch, Merck: Grant Investigator, Grant recipient The Medicines Company: Speaker’s Bureau, Speaker honorarium


2006 ◽  
Vol 101 ◽  
pp. S198
Author(s):  
Ziad F. Gellad ◽  
Barbara D. Alexander ◽  
Jesse K. Liu ◽  
Brian C. Griffith ◽  
Angela M. Meyer ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 61 (9) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ryan M. Rivosecchi ◽  
Cornelius J. Clancy ◽  
Ryan K. Shields ◽  
Christopher R. Ensor ◽  
Michael A. Shullo ◽  
...  

ABSTRACT We evaluated the interaction between isavuconazole and tacrolimus among 55 organ transplant recipients. After isavuconazole discontinuation, the tacrolimus concentration/dose ratio normalized by weight (C/D) was reduced by 16%. Liver transplant recipients experienced the largest C/D reduction. A 1.3-fold decrease in tacrolimus daily dose was required to maintain desired tacrolimus levels. There was considerable interpatient variability in the magnitude of the drug interaction. Tacrolimus doses should not be adjusted uniformly but, rather, be guided by therapeutic drug monitoring.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document