Enhanced Recovery After Surgery™ Awake Minimally-Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: 2-Dimensional Operative Video

2018 ◽  
Vol 16 (4) ◽  
pp. 519-519 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hsuan-Kan Chang ◽  
John Paul G Kolcun ◽  
Peng-Yuan Chang ◽  
Michael Y Wang
Keyword(s):  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Interbody Fusion ◽  
Enhanced Recovery ◽  
Enhanced Recovery After Surgery ◽  
Hospital Costs ◽  
Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion ◽  
Bone Morphogenetic Protein 2 ◽  
Ethical Standards ◽  
Lumbar Interbody Fusion ◽  
Research Committee

Abstract This video demonstrates the awake endoscopic minimally-invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF) used in our institution's developing Enhanced Recovery After Surgery program. This technique relies on 6 key components, including (1) conscious sedation, (2) endoscopic visualization, (3) long-acting local anesthesia, (4) an expandable interbody device, (5) osteobiologics, and (6) percutaneous instrumentation. In joining these technologies, this procedure embodies the principles of minimally invasive surgery while achieving excellent clinical outcomes. We have previously described this procedure in detail, as well as its impact at our institution, including significant reductions in operative time, blood loss, postoperative length of stay, and hospital costs. The procedure depicted in this video involves the off-label use of bone morphogenetic protein-2 and the Spineology Optimesh allograft containment device. All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. The patient gave direct consent for the use of the video footage and associated information from this surgery for the making and publication of this surgical video.

scholarly journals Clinical results of percutaneous biportal endoscopic lumbar interbody fusion with application of enhanced recovery after surgery

2019 ◽  
Vol 46 (4) ◽  
pp. E18 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dong Hwa Heo ◽  
Choon Keun Park
Keyword(s):  
Interbody Fusion ◽  
Enhanced Recovery ◽  
Enhanced Recovery After Surgery ◽  
Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion ◽  
Clinical Results ◽  
Fusion Rate ◽  
Lumbar Interbody Fusion ◽  
Estimated Blood Loss ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
The Mean

OBJECTIVEThe aims of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) are to improve surgical outcomes, shorten hospital stays, and reduce complications. The objective of this study was to introduce ERAS with biportal endoscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) and to investigate the clinical results.METHODSPatients were divided into two groups based on the fusion procedures. Patients who received microscopic TLIF without ERAS were classified as the non-ERAS group, whereas those who received percutaneous biportal endoscopic TLIF with ERAS were classified as the ERAS group. The mean Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and visual analog scale (VAS) scores were compared between the two groups. In addition, demographic characteristics, diagnosis, mean operative time, estimated blood loss (EBL), fusion rate, readmissions, and complications were investigated and compared.RESULTSForty-six patients were grouped into the non-ERAS group (microscopic TLIF without ERAS) and 23 patients into the ERAS group (biportal endoscopic TLIF with ERAS). The VAS score for preoperative back pain on days 1 and 2 was significantly higher in the non-ERAS group than in the ERAS group (p < 0.05). The mean operative duration was significantly higher in the ERAS group than in the non-ERAS group, while the mean EBL was significantly lower in the ERAS group than in the non-ERAS group (p < 0.05). There was no significant difference in fusion rate between the two groups (p > 0.05). Readmission was required in 2 patients who were from the non-ERAS group. Postoperative complications occurred in 6 cases in the non-ERAS group and in 2 cases in the ERAS group.CONCLUSIONSPercutaneous biportal endoscopic TLIF with an ERAS pathway may have good aspects in reducing bleeding and postoperative pain. Endoscopic fusion surgery along with the ERAS concept may help to accelerate recovery after surgery.

scholarly journals Endoscopic Versus Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion in 1-Segment Lumbar Spondylolisthesis: A Prospective Randomised Pilot Study

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
You Lv ◽  
Ming Chen ◽  
Ru-Jie Qin ◽  
Cheng Ma ◽  
Qi-Rui Ding ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Interbody Fusion ◽  
Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion ◽  
Bone Morphogenetic Protein 2 ◽  
Lumbar Interbody Fusion ◽  
Trial Registry ◽  
Clinical Trial Registry ◽  
Multifidus Muscle ◽  
Lumbar Spondylolisthesis

Abstract BackgroundThere are currently several minimally invasive techniques for lumbar spine interbody fusion that have been shown to minimize surgical and perioperative morbidity. We aimed to evaluate the curative efficacy of endoscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (Endo-TLIF) by comparing perioperative characteristics and 1.5-year observational outcomes in 1-segment lumbar spondylolisthesis between the minimally invasive TLIF (MIS-TLIF) technique and the optimized Endo-TLIF technique. MethodsOne hundred and two patients treated by MIS-TLIF (48 cases) or Endo-TLIF (54 cases) were included from January 2017 to January 2019. Perioperative parameters and clinical outcomes were evaluated. Inflammatory biomarkers were measured for postoperative traumatic stress and muscle injury. Fusion rates were determined at 18 months after surgery by CT and the necessity of recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 (rhBMP-2) application in Endo-TLIF was also observed. ResultsThe Endo-TLIF group had similar incision length, return to work time and rate (p>0.05). Blood loss, left bed time and analgesic ratio were significantly less in Endo-TLIF group (p<0.05). The Endo-TLIF group had a significantly longer operative and radiation exposure time compared with MIS-TLIF group (p<0.05). The CRP and ESR levels were lower in the Endo-TLIF group compared with the MIS-TLIF group (p<0.05). The VAS and ODI improved significantly in both groups after surgery. Significant decreases in low back VAS in the Endo-TLIF group were found at postoperative day 1 and 3 months after surgery (p<0.05). The fusion rate in the Endo-TLIF/rhBMP-2 group (75%) was lower than that in the MIS-TLIF group (95.8%)，but it was similar to that in the Endo-TLIF/rhBMP-2 group (90%).ConclusionsEndo-TLIF has comparable perioperative analysis and clinical outcomes in comparison to MIS-TLIF and manifests a greater improvement in less multifidus muscle damage, inflammation and faster patient recovery. Thus, Endo-TLIF should be considered as a feasible and effective technique for 1-segment lumbar spondylolisthesis patients.Trial registration: ChiCTR1800015197, 13 March 2018. Trial registry: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry.

scholarly journals Evaluations of minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion performed with rhBMP-2

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bin Lv ◽  
Yuting Hou ◽  
Xiang Jin ◽  
Dan Luo ◽  
Lei Wang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Clinical Data ◽  
Interbody Fusion ◽  
Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion ◽  
Bone Morphogenetic Protein 2 ◽  
Lumbar Interbody Fusion ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Cage Subsidence

Abstract Background: The combination of minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF) and recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein 2 (rhBMP-2) is widely used for its advantage of rapid recovery and improved bone fusion. However, no previous study has reported the synergistic effect of MIS-TLIF with rhBMP-2 in patients with degenerative lumbar disease (DLD). Objective: To investigate the radiographic and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in patients with DLD who underwent MIS-TLIF with and without a low dose of rhBMP-2. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 48 patients treated with MIS-TLIF from 2013 to 2016. The patients were classified into the rhBMP-2 group (n = 25) and non-rhBMP-2 group (n = 23). Fusion-related parameters were measured before and after the operation. Clinical data included the numeric rating scale (NRS) score, Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) scores, and the MOS 36-item short form health survey (SF-36) score, which were documented to evaluate the effect of surgery. Results: In the 48 patients who underwent MIS-TLIF, the operated disc was predominantly at the L4/5 and L5/S1 levels. ADH, MDH, and PDH increased significantly in both groups after surgery (P < 0.05). FH improved in the rhBMP-2 group, but not in the non-rhBMP-2 group. There was no obvious improvement in SA in both groups. Furthermore, the SL showed a significant difference in both groups and a significant improvement over the baseline. The LL showed significant improvement in the two groups at the early follow-up (P < 0.05), but the improvement did not persist. Cage subsidence had no significant effect on different subsidence grades. In addition, no differences in cage subsidence were observed in different types of modic change (MC), except for MC 0 in both groups. There was no difference in PROs even though all clinical outcomes improved significantly during the postoperative follow-up period in both groups. Conclusion: MIS-TLIF with the low doses of rhBMP-2 resulted in an improvement in radiographic and clinical results, but not a longer-lasting restoration for radiographic outcomes. Cage subsidence is not associated with the MC. Further, our clinical data demonstrated no difference between both groups.

scholarly journals The Effect of Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion Compared with Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Combined with Enhanced Recovery after Surgery Program on Patients with Lumbar Degenerative Disease at Short-Term Follow-Up

2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 ◽  
pp. 1-7
Author(s):  
Wenxiang Chen ◽  
Huiying Yang ◽  
Xuesheng Jiang ◽  
Shunwu Fan
Keyword(s):  
Interbody Fusion ◽  
Enhanced Recovery ◽  
Enhanced Recovery After Surgery ◽  
Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion ◽  
Therapeutic Effects ◽  
Reference Ranges ◽  
Lumbar Interbody Fusion ◽  
Short Term ◽  
Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion

Purpose. Oblique lumbar interbody fusion (OLIF) approach has been increasingly frequently performed in recent years. However, neither studies of OLIF approach nor the researches of the application of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) in spinal surgery are relatively rare. Here, our study is aimed at investigating the therapeutic effects of the application of OLIF compared with transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) approach combined with ERAS in dealing with this disorder at short-term follow-up. Material and Methods. Thirty-eight patients who undergone OLIF and forty patients who undergone TLIF with pedicle screws were included in our study. The concept of ERAS was applied in the perioperative period of the patients. Preoperative and postoperative laboratory test indexes of blood were examined and evaluated in all individuals. Visual analogue scale (VAS), Oswestry disability index (ODI), and Clinical Symptom Score of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) were used in preoperative evaluation and postoperative follow-up. Satisfaction survey was also performed after surgery. Result. The postoperative results of red blood count, C-reaction protein, D-dimer, and albumin were still within the reference ranges in most of the patients. It was shown that objective evaluations including VAS score, ODI index, and JOA score were significantly improved after OLIF and TLIF surgery. The follow-up of 6 months after surgery showed that VAS, ODI, and JOA were improved more in the OLIF group than that in the TLIF group. The overall satisfaction (satisfied and very satisfied) was 95% and 97.4% in the TLIF group and the OLIF group, respectively, and there was no difference between the two groups. Conclusion. This study indicated that OLIF and TLIF approach were both rather effective therapies for patients with lumbar degenerative diseases. The effect of OLIF procedure could be better than TLIF procedure in the early stage after surgery.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document