Optic Canal Decompression: Concepts and Techniques: 2-Dimensional Operative Video

The optic canal (OC) is a bony channel that transmits the optic nerve (ON) and ophthalmic artery (OphA) as they course through the lesser wing of the sphenoid bone to the orbital apex. The OC is involved in a variety of intracranial and extracranial pathologies,1 and opening of the canal may be necessary in order to achieve adequate exposure, better disease control, and vision preservation.2 Depending on the location of the pathology and its relationship with the optic nerve, the OC may be decompressed through an open transcranial approach or an endoscopic endonasal approach.1,3 OC drilling can be tailored based on the location of the pathology and its extension. Anterior clinoid process and optic strut drilling can be added based on these factors as well.4,5 In this video, we demonstrate the steps of OC drilling in both transcranial microscopic and endoscopic endonasal approaches through a combination of animated illustrations and operative videos. We present 4 cases, including 2 transcranial microscopic and 2 endoscopic endonasal approaches,6 demonstrating OC decompression and its technical nuances. Each case was selected to represent the range of pathologies relevant to OC drilling to allow for a complete understanding of the techniques and concepts required for optimal treatment. An informed written consent has been obtained from each of the patients in this publication. Video © Mayo Foundation for Medical Education and Research. All rights reserved. Copyright information: Bendok BR, Abi-Aad KR, Sattur MG, Welz ME, Hoxworth JM, Lal D. Endoscopic resection of a paraclinoid meningioma extending into the optic canal: 2-dimensional operative video. Operative Neurosurgery. 2018 September 1;15(3):356 by permission of Oxford University Press. Cadaveric images provided by courtesy of: The Rhoton Collection. http://rhoton.ineurodb.org/.

Increases in female academic productivity and female mentorship highlight sustained progress in previously identified neurosurgical gender disparities

OBJECTIVEA meta-analysis was performed to understand disparities in the representation of female authorship within the neurosurgical literature and implications for career advancement of women in neurosurgery.METHODSAuthor names for articles published in 16 of the top neurosurgical journals from 2002 to 2019 were obtained from MEDLINE. The gender of each author was determined using automated prediction methods. Publication trends were compared over time and across subdisciplines. Female authorship was also compared to the proportionate composition of women in the field over time.RESULTSThe metadata obtained from 16 major neurosurgical journals yielded 66,546 research articles. Gender was successfully determined for 96% (127,809/133,578) of first and senior authors, while the remainder (3.9%) were unable to be determined through prediction methods. Across all years, 13.3% (8826) of articles had female first authorship and 9.1% (6073) had female senior authorship. Female first authorship increased significantly over time from 5.8% in 2002 to 17.2% in 2019 (p < 0.001). Female senior authorship also increased significantly over time, from 5.5% in 2002 to 12.0% in 2019 (p < 0.001). The journals with the highest proportions of female first authors and senior authors were the Journal of Neurosurgery: Pediatrics (33.5%) and the Asian Journal of Neurosurgery (23.8%), respectively. Operative Neurosurgery had the lowest fraction of female first (12.4%) and senior (4.7%) authors. There was a significant difference between the year-by-year proportion of female neurosurgical trainees and the year-by-year proportion of female neurosurgical first (p < 0.001) and senior (p < 0.001) authors. Articles were also more likely to have a female first author if the senior author of the article was female (OR 2.69, CI 2.52–2.86; p < 0.001). From 1944 to 2019, the Journal of Neurosurgery showed a steady increase in female first and senior authorship, with a plateau beginning in the 1990s.CONCLUSIONSLarge meta-analysis techniques have the potential to effectively leverage large amounts of bibliometric data to quantify the representation of female authorship in the neurosurgical literature. The proportion of female authors in major neurosurgical journals has steadily increased. However, the rate of increase in female senior authorship has lagged behind the rate of increase in first authorship, indicating a disparity in academic advancement in women in neurosurgery.