Prologue

2020 ◽  
pp. 27-72
Author(s):  
Paul Guyer
Keyword(s):  
Mathematical Method ◽  
Natural Theology ◽  
Honorable Mention

In 1762, both Mendelssohn and Kant submitted essays in response to the Berlin Academy’s question on the possibility of using the mathematical method in philosophy, specifically natural theology and morality. Mendelssohn won first prize for his argument that both mathematics and philosophy tie conceptual analyses to reality by experience, while Kant won honorable mention for an early version of his position that the methods of mathematics and philosophy are essentially different. After this, the two philosophers could not avoid taking account of the views of each other.

Linear Discriminatory Analysis: A Patient Classifying for Research and Production Control

1971 ◽  
Vol 10 (02) ◽  
pp. 96-102 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. HALLEN ◽  
P. HALL ◽  
H. SELANDER
Keyword(s):  
Mathematical Method ◽  
Medical Information ◽  
Production Control ◽  
Human Ability ◽  
Discriminatory Analysis

Administrative and medical information about the patient forms, in each case, a pattern, the complexity of which increases as the number of data grows. Even when the data are 4—5 in number, the human ability to recognize and distinguish between different patterns begins to fail, A mathematical method (linear discriminatory analysis) has been worked out. This system of analysis appears to provide opportunities of placing patients with the same or similar patterns in classes which are diagnostically, prognostically or therapeutically homogeneous.

John Ray, physico-theology and afterwards

2011 ◽  
Vol 38 (2) ◽  
pp. 328-348 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. J. Berry
Keyword(s):  
Eighteenth Century ◽  
Intelligent Design ◽  
Trinity College ◽  
Natural Theology ◽  
Biblical Interpretation ◽  
John Ray ◽  
The Way

Ray's most widely read book was his Wisdom of God manifested in the works of creation (1691), probably based on addresses given in the chapel of Trinity College Cambridge 20 years previously. In it he forswore the use of allegory in biblical interpretation, just as he had done in his (and Francis Willughby's) Ornithology (1678). His discipline seeped into theology, complementing the influence of the Reformers and weakening Enlightenment assumptions about teleology, thus softening the hammer-blows of Darwinism on Deism. The physico-theology of the eighteenth century and the popularity of Gilbert White and the like survived the squeezing of natural theology by Paley and the Bridgewater Treatises a century after Wisdom … , and contributed to a peculiarly British understanding of natural theology. This undergirded the subsequent impact of the results of the voyagers and geologists and prepared the way for a modern reading of God's “Book of Works” (“Darwinism … under the disguise of a foe, did the work of a friend”). Natural theology is often assumed to have been completely discredited by Darwin (as well as condemned by Barth and ridiculed by Dawkins). Notwithstanding, and despite the vapours of vitalism (ironically urged – among others – by Ray's biographer, Charles Raven) and the current fashion for “intelligent design”, the attitudes encouraged by Wisdom … still seem to be robust, albeit needing constant re-tuning (as in all understandings influenced by science).

The new natural theology

1995 ◽  
Vol 1 (Part_1) ◽  
pp. 41-50 ◽  
Author(s):  
John Polkinghorne
Keyword(s):  
Natural Theology

Intuitions and Arguments: Cognitive Foundations of Argumentation in Natural Theology

2017 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 57-82 ◽  
Author(s):  
Helen De Cruz ◽  
Johan De Smedt
Keyword(s):  
Social Context ◽  
Raw Materials ◽  
Natural Theology ◽  
The Social ◽  
Social Theories ◽  
Cognitive Foundations

This paper examines the cognitive foundations of natural theology: the intuitions that provide the raw materials for religious arguments, and the social context in which they are defended or challenged. We show that the premises on which natural theological arguments are based rely on intuitions that emerge early in development, and that underlie our expectations for everyday situations, e.g., about how causation works, or how design is recognized. In spite of the universality of these intuitions, the cogency of natural theological arguments remains a matter of continued debate. To understand why they are controversial, we draw on social theories of reasoning and argumentation.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document