Recuperating Loss? Reconstruction, Reenactment, and Work Performance

2020 ◽  
pp. 259-276
Author(s):  
Anna Pakes

Chapter 12 explores the extent to which different practices of dance re-doing recuperate lost works, focusing on reconstruction, reworking, and reenactment. It explores what kind of relation obtains between such re-doings and the works they represent. None of these processes seems (simply or straightforwardly) to produce new performances of existing dance works and, in this, they disrupt what David Davies calls the “classical paradigm” of work-performance relations. This paradigm is explicated to highlight its limitations in the dance context. The chapter also explores whether and how reconstructions, reworkings, and reenactments can contribute to knowledge of the choreographic works they remake, and to dance history more generally, given that they are often not motivated by an objective of Werktreue. In this regard, the argument is developed that some reconstructions and reenactments are a species of historical fiction, allowing audiences to entertain while withholding belief about the dance historical representations they offer.

2014 ◽  
Vol 35 (3) ◽  
pp. 144-157 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martin Bäckström ◽  
Fredrik Björklund

The difference between evaluatively loaded and evaluatively neutralized five-factor inventory items was used to create new variables, one for each factor in the five-factor model. Study 1 showed that these variables can be represented in terms of a general evaluative factor which is related to social desirability measures and indicated that the factor may equally well be represented as separate from the Big Five as superordinate to them. Study 2 revealed an evaluative factor in self-ratings and peer ratings of the Big Five, but the evaluative factor in self-reports did not correlate with such a factor in ratings by peers. In Study 3 the evaluative factor contributed above the Big Five in predicting work performance, indicating a substance component. The results are discussed in relation to measurement issues and self-serving biases.


2017 ◽  
Vol 16 (2) ◽  
pp. 61-76 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anaïs Thibault Landry ◽  
Marylène Gagné ◽  
Jacques Forest ◽  
Sylvie Guerrero ◽  
Michel Séguin ◽  
...  

Abstract. To this day, researchers are debating the adequacy of using financial incentives to bolster performance in work settings. Our goal was to contribute to current understanding by considering the moderating role of distributive justice in the relation between financial incentives, motivation, and performance. Based on self-determination theory, we hypothesized that when bonuses are fairly distributed, using financial incentives makes employees feel more competent and autonomous, which in turn fosters greater autonomous motivation and lower controlled motivation, and better work performance. Results from path analyses in three samples supported our hypotheses, suggesting that the effect of financial incentives is contextual, and that compensation plans using financial incentives and bonuses can be effective when properly managed.


2012 ◽  
Author(s):  
Catherine K. Lam ◽  
Xu Huang ◽  
Onne Janssen ◽  
Wing Lam ◽  
Ziguang Chen

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document