Conscientious Objection

2014 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark R. Wicclair
Keyword(s):  
End Of Life ◽  
Health Professionals ◽  
End Of Life Care ◽  
Medical Service ◽  
Conscientious Objection ◽  
Reasonable Accommodation ◽  
Life Care ◽  
Middle Ground ◽  
Moral Integrity ◽  
Legal Rules

This chapter examines conscientious objection in health care, with a specific focus on end-of-life care. It begins with a brief historical overview and identifies distinguishing characteristics of refusals to provide a medical service that are instances of conscientious objection (conscience-based refusals). Several reasons are presented for accommodating conscience-based refusals, and it is maintained that the primary reason is to enable health professionals to maintain their moral integrity. Two extreme approaches to managing conscience-based refusals are critically analyzed, and a middle-ground approach (reasonable accommodation) is explained and defended. Conscience clauses (i.e., legal rules and regulations that protect the exercise of conscience) are discussed, and it is argued that typical conscience clauses do not provide an appropriate model for public policy in relation to conscientious objection in end-of-life care.

scholarly journals “I haven’t had to bare my soul but now I kind of have to”: describing how voluntary assisted dying conscientious objectors anticipated approaching conversations with patients in Victoria, Australia

2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Casey Michelle Haining ◽  
Louise Anne Keogh
Keyword(s):  
Health Professional ◽  
End Of Life ◽  
Health Professionals ◽  
Medical Service ◽  
Qualitative Interviews ◽  
Conscientious Objection ◽  
Assisted Dying ◽  
Moral Integrity ◽  
Conscientious Objectors ◽  
Education Needs

Abstract Background Dealing with end of life is challenging for patients and health professionals alike. The situation becomes even more challenging when a patient requests a legally permitted medical service that a health professional is unable to provide due to a conflict of conscience. Such a scenario arises when Victorian health professionals, with a conscientious objection (CO) to voluntary assisted dying (VAD), are presented with patients who request VAD or merely ask about VAD. The Voluntary Assisted Dying Act 2017 (Vic) recognizes the inherent conflict of conscience that may arise for some health professionals when asked to provide VAD and responds by affording broad protection to conscientious objectors who wish to refuse to take part in the VAD process. Methods Seventeen semi-structured qualitative interviews were conducted with Victorian health professionals with a self-identified CO to VAD in the lead-up to the implementation of VAD in Victoria. Interviews explored how participants anticipated they would manage their CO in practice. Interviews were transcribed verbatim and analyzed thematically. Results Our results reveal that the way in which health professionals claimed they would approach CO conversations is variable and was dependant on the strength of their opposition to VAD. We categorized conscientious objectors according to their approach as either dissuasive non-referrers, passive non-referrers, facilitators or negotiators. Our study also explores the perceived difficulties of exercising one’s CO as identified by our participants. Conclusion The broad protection offered by the Voluntary Assisted Dying Act 2017 (Vic) encourages a range of behaviors from conscientious objectors, due to the minimal obligations imposed. In order to assist conscientious objectors, more policy, institutional guidance, and education needs to be available to conscientious objectors explicitly addressing how to effectively manage one’s CO. Such guidance is imperative to ensuring that their moral integrity is preserved and that they are exercising their CO appropriately.

scholarly journals Before the 2020 Pandemic: an observational study exploring public knowledge, attitudes, plans, and preferences towards death and end of life care in Wales

2021 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ishrat Islam ◽  
Annmarie Nelson ◽  
Mirella Longo ◽  
Anthony Byrne
Keyword(s):  
Social Media ◽  
End Of Life ◽  
Health Professionals ◽  
End Of Life Care ◽  
Public Attitudes ◽  
Death And Dying ◽  
Service Utilisation ◽  
Life Care ◽  
Manner Of Death ◽  
Attitudes Towards Death

Abstract Background Understanding public attitudes towards death and dying is important to inform public policies around End of Life Care (EoLC). We studied the public attitudes towards death and dying in Wales. Methods An online survey was conducted in 2018. Social media and the HealthWiseWales platform were used to recruit participants. Data were analysed using descriptive statistics and thematic analysis. Results 2,210 people participated. Loss of independence (84%), manner of death, and leaving their beloved behind were the biggest fears around death and dying. In terms of EoLC, participants sought timely access to care (84%) and being surrounded by loved ones (62%). Being at home was less of a priority (24%). Only 50% were familiar with Advance Care Planning (ACP). A lack of standard procedures as well as of support for the execution of plans and the ability to revisit those plans hindered uptake. The taboo around death conversations, the lack of opportunities and skills to initiate discussion, and personal fear and discomfort inhibited talking about death and dying. 72% felt that we do not talk enough about death and dying and advocated normalising talking by demystifying death with a positive approach. Health professionals could initiate and support this conversation, but this depended on communication skills and manageable workload pressure. Participants encouraged a public health approach and endorsed the use of: a) social media and other public platforms, b) formal education, c) formal and legal actions, and d) signposting and access to information. Conclusions People are ready to talk about death and dying and COVID-19 has increased awareness. A combination of top-down and bottom-up initiatives across levels and settings can increase awareness, knowledge, and service-utilisation-drivers to support health professionals and people towards shared decisions which align with people’s end of life wishes and preferences.

Palliative care for community patients diagnosed with dementia: a systematic review

2019 ◽  
Vol 24 (12) ◽  
pp. 570-575
Author(s):  
Cathryn Smith ◽  
Gina Newbury
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Palliative Care ◽  
End Of Life ◽  
Health Professionals ◽  
End Of Life Care ◽  
Good Practice ◽  
Community Setting ◽  
Life Care ◽  
Staff Support ◽  
The Uk

Despite many efforts made by health organisations to deliver effective end-of-life care to patients with dementia, research indicates that palliative care is predominantly aimed at patients with terminal cancer, and that patients with dementia face challenges in accessing end-of-life care. This article explores the views of health professionals on providing palliative care to those patients diagnosed with dementia within the community setting. A systematic review of seven qualitative studies was performed to identify the best available evidence. The findings show that effective palliative care for patients with dementia continues being affected by many barriers and challenges. Good practice seems to be inconsistent and fragmented throughout the UK and European countries, and many health professionals are faced with difficulties associated with services and financial implications, training and education, staff support, communication, family support and dementia care.

Identifying Perceptions of Health Professionals Regarding Deathbed Visions and Spiritual Care in End-of-Life Care

2017 ◽  
Vol 19 (2) ◽  
pp. 177-184
Author(s):  
Sung Ok Chang ◽  
Soo Yeon Ahn ◽  
Myung-Ok Cho ◽  
Kyung Sook Choi ◽  
Eun Suk Kong ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
End Of Life ◽  
Spiritual Care ◽  
Health Professionals ◽  
End Of Life Care ◽  
Life Care ◽  
Deathbed Visions

Common dedication to facilitating good dying experiences: Qualitative study of end-of-life care professionals’ attitudes towards voluntary assisted dying

2019 ◽  
Vol 33 (6) ◽  
pp. 562-569 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sarah-May Blaschke ◽  
Penelope Schofield ◽  
Keryn Taylor ◽  
Anna Ugalde
Keyword(s):  
Qualitative Study ◽  
End Of Life ◽  
Health Professionals ◽  
End Of Life Care ◽  
Policy Development ◽  
Sampling Strategy ◽  
Assisted Dying ◽  
Life Care ◽  
Structured Interviews ◽  
Moral Philosophies

Background: Debate about appropriate and ethically acceptable end-of-life choices is ongoing, which includes discussion about the legalization of voluntary assisted dying. Given health professionals’ role in caring for patients at the end life, their stance towards assisting a person with dying can have implications for policy development and implementation in jurisdictions where law changes are being considered. Aim: To explore end-of-life care professionals’ attitudes towards voluntary assisted dying 6 months prior to vote on legalization. Design: Qualitative study using textual data collected through semi-structured interviews. Purposive sampling strategy used to collect a broad representation of perspectives. Audio-recorded interviews were transcribed verbatim and subjected to qualitative descriptive analysis techniques. Participants: A total of 16 health professionals with experience in caring for people with life-limiting illness. Results: Participants reported two overarching positions grounded in differing moral philosophies with compelling arguments both for and against legalization of voluntary assisted dying. A third and common line of argument emerged from areas of shared concern and uncertainty about the practical consequences of introducing voluntary assisted dying. While a diversity of opinion was evident, all participants advocated for more public education and funding into end-of-life care services to make high-quality care equitable and widely available. Conclusion: Common dedication to reducing suffering and facilitating good dying experiences exists among experts despite their divergent views on voluntary assisted dying. Ongoing engagement with stakeholders is needed for practical resolution in the interest of developing health policy for best patient care.

How is advance care planning conceptualised in Australia? Findings from key informant interviews

2011 ◽  
Vol 35 (2) ◽  
pp. 197 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joel J. Rhee ◽  
Nicholas A. Zwar
Keyword(s):  
End Of Life ◽  
Advance Care Planning ◽  
Health Professionals ◽  
End Of Life Care ◽  
Aged Care ◽  
Treatment Preferences ◽  
Successful Implementation ◽  
Care Planning ◽  
Life Care ◽  
Advance Care

Objective. Advance Care Planning (ACP) has been gaining prominence as an important component of good end-of-life care. This study explored how ACP is conceptualised by stakeholder organisations and clinicians involved in aged care and end-of-life care in Australia, in particular their views on the aim, appropriate context and settings for ACP, and how ACP should be facilitated. Participants. Twenty-three participants including expert clinicians and representatives of government organisations, professional societies, consumer groups and other organisations involved in aged care and end-of-life care. Design. Qualitative descriptive analysis of semi-structured telephone interviews. Results. Most participants viewed ACP as an ongoing process aimed at enhancing an individual’s autonomy and ensuring good end-of-life care. However, there were significant differences in how this process was conceptualised. Some viewed ACP as a process undertaken by patients to define and communicate their treatment preferences. Others viewed ACP as discussions undertaken by health professionals to gain a better understanding of the patient’s values and goals in order to provide good care. Implications. Our findings highlight significant differences in how ACP is conceptualised in Australia. A shared conceptualisation and agreement on purpose is needed to ensure a successful implementation of ACP in Australia. What is known about the topic? Advance care planning (ACP) has been gaining increasing prominence both internationally and in Australia and is seen as an important component of good end-of-life care. Originally conceptualised as a document outlining a patient’s specific treatment preferences about life-sustaining treatments, ACP has been increasingly recognised in the literature as an ongoing process of discussion, communication and documentation of the patient’s wishes and values regarding end-of-life care. What does this paper add? This paper shows that most expert clinicians and representatives of key stakeholder organisations view ACP as a process that aims to enhance individual autonomy and ensure good end-of-life care. However, our findings show that they often hold contrasting views on ACP – ranging from a consumer-orientated view that sees ACP as undertaken to define and communicate their care preferences; to a care-orientated view that sees ACP as discussions led by health professionals in order to gain an understanding of patients’ values and wishes in order to provide better care. What are the implications for practitioners? Our findings highlight significant differences in how ACP is conceptualised in Australia. This can cause confusion and conflict, leading to reduced effectiveness of ACP. A shared conceptualisation and agreement on purpose is needed to ensure a successful implementation of ACP in Australia.

End-of-life care perspectives of patients and health professionals in an Indian health-care setting

2014 ◽  
Vol 20 (11) ◽  
pp. 557-564 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ranjitha Chacko ◽  
Jasmin Ruby Anand ◽  
Amala Rajan ◽  
Subhashini John ◽  
Vishalakshi Jeyaseelan
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
End Of Life ◽  
Health Professionals ◽  
End Of Life Care ◽  
Care Setting ◽  
Health Care Setting ◽  
Life Care ◽  
Indian Health

Prescribing in end-of-life care

2019 ◽  
Vol 1 (6) ◽  
pp. 284-288
Author(s):  
Amanda Armstrong
Keyword(s):  
End Of Life ◽  
Health Professionals ◽  
End Of Life Care ◽  
Care Planning ◽  
Advanced Care Planning ◽  
Life Care ◽  
Limiting Condition

End-of-life care aims to support a person in the last stages of a life-limiting condition to live as well as possible until they die. Prescribing at the end-of-life presents many challenges. Advanced care planning can be carried out so that health professionals are aware and supportive of the patient's and their family's wishes. This article discusses the care and management of patients as they receive care at the end of their life as well as any anticipatory medication that may be needed.

Planning End-of-Life Care for Patients with Dementia: Roles of Families and Health Professionals

2001 ◽  
Vol 42 (4) ◽  
pp. 273-291 ◽  
Author(s):  
Charles E. Gessert ◽  
Sarah Forbes ◽  
Mercedes Bern-Klug
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
End Of Life ◽  
Health Professionals ◽  
End Of Life Care ◽  
Family Members ◽  
Care Planning ◽  
Life Care ◽  
Dementia Patients ◽  
Advance Care ◽  
Surrogate Decision

We examined families' end-of-life decision making and their interactions with health professionals. Twenty-eight family members of institutionalized dementia patients participated in four focus groups. We found that participating family members were not well prepared for their decision-making roles, and that they: 1) experienced substantial burdens and loss in caring for institutionalized elders; 2) had limited understanding of the natural progression of dementing conditions; 3) were uncomfortable in setting goals for their relatives' end-of-life care; 4) had little experience with death, and were ambivalent about the anticipated death of their relative; and (5) reported that they had little substantive communication with health professionals regarding end-of-life care planning. We concluded that many of the needs of such families could be addressed through improved application of the principles of advance care planning, including regular structured discussions, involvement of surrogate decision-makers, and anticipation of clinical decisions. Health professionals should take the lead in ‘normalizing’ the discussion of death.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document