Characterization of Honeybee (Apis mellifera L.) Chromosomes Using Repetitive DNA Probes and Fluorescence in situ Hybridization

1995 ◽  
Vol 86 (2) ◽  
pp. 145-150 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Beye ◽  
R. F. A. Moritz
Genome ◽  
1995 ◽  
Vol 38 (6) ◽  
pp. 1061-1069 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Cuadrado ◽  
N. Jouve ◽  
C. Ceoloni

The molecular characterization of heterochromatin in six lines of rye has been performed using fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). The highly repetitive rye DNA sequences pSc 119.2, pSc74, and pSc34, and the probes pTa71 and pSc794 containing the 25S–5.8S–18S rDNA (NOR) and the 5S rDNA multigene families, respectively, were used. This allowed the individual identification of all seven rye chromosomes and most chromosome arms in all lines. All varieties showed similar but not identical patterns. A standard in situ hybridization map was constructed following the nomenclature system recommended for C-bands. All FISH sites observed appeared to correspond well with C-band locations, but not all C-banding sites coincided with hybridization sites of the repetitive DNA probes used. Quantitative and qualitative differences between different varieties were found for in situ hybridization response at corresponding sites. Variation between plants and even between homologous chromosomes of the same plant was found in open-pollinated lines. In inbred lines, the in situ pattern of the homologues was practically identical and no variation between plants was detected. The observed quantitative and qualitative differences are consistent with a corresponding variation for C-bands detected both within and between cultivars.Key words: fluorescence in situ hybridization, repetitive DNA, rye, Secale cereale, polymorphism.


Cytometry ◽  
1994 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
pp. 13-25 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dino Celeda ◽  
Klaus Aldinger ◽  
Frank-Martin Haar ◽  
Michael Hausmann ◽  
Markus Durm ◽  
...  

1992 ◽  
Vol 47 (9-10) ◽  
pp. 739-747 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dino Celeda ◽  
Ulrich Bettag ◽  
Christoph Cremer

Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) has found widespread applications in cytogenetics. So far the standard protocols for probe amplification (and simultaneous labeling) by PCR, nick translation and in situ hybridization involve different buffer systems leading to a number of time consuming washing steps even before hybridization. In this manuscript we show a fast technique of a close combination of DNA probe preparation and in situ hybridization (ISH). This method was applied to metaphase chromosomes from human lymphocytes fixed on slides. Two specific repetitive DNA probes, the pUC 1.77 DNA probe and the DYZ 1 repetitive DNA fraction were used, amplified and labeled in different ways. Additional experiments with total genomic male human DNA as the DNA probe suggest that this method may be extended to a large variety of other probes. Moreover the ISH technique described does not require toxic denaturing agents, such as formamide.


2011 ◽  
Vol 30 (9) ◽  
pp. 1779-1786 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kun Yang ◽  
Hecui Zhang ◽  
Richard Converse ◽  
Yong Wang ◽  
Xiaoying Rong ◽  
...  

Genomics ◽  
1993 ◽  
Vol 17 (2) ◽  
pp. 403-407 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elizabeth A. Lindsay ◽  
Stephanie Halford ◽  
Roy Wadey ◽  
Peter J. Scambler ◽  
Antonio Baldini

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document