Evaluation of the Undesired Neutron Dose Equivalent to Critical Organs in Patients Treated by Linear Accelerator Gamma Ray Therapy

1992 ◽  
Vol 44 (1-4) ◽  
pp. 457-462 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Manfredotti ◽  
U. Nastasi ◽  
E. Ornato ◽  
A. Zanini
1984 ◽  
Vol 19 (3) ◽  
pp. 209-214
Author(s):  
Yoshihiro OGAWA ◽  
Yuichiro KIMURA ◽  
Yoshihide HONDA ◽  
Kenichi OKAMOTO ◽  
Tadashi TSUJIMOTO ◽  
...  

1985 ◽  
Vol 20 (4) ◽  
pp. 371-378
Author(s):  
Keiji ODA ◽  
Hiroshi KOYAMA ◽  
Hidehito MUKAI ◽  
Takayoshi YAMAMOTO ◽  
Takashi NAKAMURA ◽  
...  

1992 ◽  
Vol 110 (2) ◽  
pp. 134-156 ◽  
Author(s):  
W. L. Dunn ◽  
A. M. Yacout ◽  
F. O’Foghludha ◽  
G. Riel

2020 ◽  
Vol 54 (2) ◽  
pp. 247-252
Author(s):  
Ana Ivkovic ◽  
Dario Faj ◽  
Mladen Kasabasic ◽  
Marina Poje Sovilj ◽  
Ivana Krpan ◽  
...  

AbstractBackgroundHigh energy electron linear accelerators (LINACs) producing photon beams with energies higher than 10 MeV are widely used in radiation therapy. In these beams, fast neutrons are generated, which results in undesired contamination of the therapeutic beam. In this study, measurements and Monte Carlo (MC) simulations were used to obtain neutron spectra and dose equivalents in vicinity of linear accelerator.Materials and methodsLINAC Siemens Oncor Expression in Osijek University Hospital is placed in vault that was previously used for 60Co machine. Then, the shielding of the vault was enhanced using lead and steel plates. Measurements of neutron dose equivalent around LINAC and the vault were done using CR-39 solid state nuclear track detectors. To compensate energy dependence of detectors, neutron energy spectra was calculated in measuring positions using MC simulations.ResultsThe vault is a source of photoneutrons, but a vast majority of neutrons originates from accelerator head. Neutron spectra obtained from MC simulations show significant changes between the measuring positions. Annual neutron dose equivalent per year was estimated to be less than 324 μSv in the measuring points outside of the vault.ConclusionsSince detectors used in this paper are very dependent on neutron energy, it is extremely important to know the neutron spectra in measuring points. Though, patient dosimetry should include neutrons, estimated annual neutron doses outside the vault were far below exposure limit of ionizing radiation for workers.


2014 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 1006-1015
Author(s):  
Negin Shagholi ◽  
Hassan Ali ◽  
Mahdi Sadeghi ◽  
Arjang Shahvar ◽  
Hoda Darestani ◽  
...  

Medical linear accelerators, besides the clinically high energy electron and photon beams, produce other secondary particles such as neutrons which escalate the delivered dose. In this study the neutron dose at 10 and 18MV Elekta linac was obtained by using TLD600 and TLD700 as well as Monte Carlo simulation. For neutron dose assessment in 2020 cm2 field, TLDs were calibrated at first. Gamma calibration was performed with 10 and 18 MV linac and neutron calibration was done with 241Am-Be neutron source. For simulation, MCNPX code was used then calculated neutron dose equivalent was compared with measurement data. Neutron dose equivalent at 18 MV was measured by using TLDs on the phantom surface and depths of 1, 2, 3.3, 4, 5 and 6 cm. Neutron dose at depths of less than 3.3cm was zero and maximized at the depth of 4 cm (44.39 mSvGy-1), whereas calculation resulted  in the maximum of 2.32 mSvGy-1 at the same depth. Neutron dose at 10 MV was measured by using TLDs on the phantom surface and depths of 1, 2, 2.5, 3.3, 4 and 5 cm. No photoneutron dose was observed at depths of less than 3.3cm and the maximum was at 4cm equal to 5.44mSvGy-1, however, the calculated data showed the maximum of 0.077mSvGy-1 at the same depth. The comparison between measured photo neutron dose and calculated data along the beam axis in different depths, shows that the measurement data were much more than the calculated data, so it seems that TLD600 and TLD700 pairs are not suitable dosimeters for neutron dosimetry in linac central axis due to high photon flux, whereas MCNPX Monte Carlo techniques still remain a valuable tool for photonuclear dose studies.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document