Godel's Correspondence on Proof Theory and Constructive Mathematics: KURT GODEL. Collected Works. Volume IV: Selected Correspondence A-G; Volume V: Selected Correspondence H-Z. Solomon Feferman, John W. Dawson, Warren Goldfarb, Charles Parsons, and Wilfried Sieg, eds. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002. Pp. xi + 662; xxiii + 664. ISBN 0-19-850073-4; 0-19-850075-0.

2006 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 76-111 ◽  
Author(s):  
W. W. Tait

Kurt Gödel. Review of Church's A set of postulates for the foundation of logic (3594). Collected Works, Volume I, Publications 1929–1936, by Kurt Gödel, edited by Solomon Feferman, John W. DawsonJr., Stephen C. Kleene, Gregory H. Moore, Robert M. Solovay, and Jean van Heijenoort, Clarendon Press, Oxford University Press, New York and Oxford1986, pp. 256, 258. (Reprinted from Zentralblatt für Mathematik und ihre Grenzgebiete, vol. 4 (1932), pp. 145–146.) - Kurt Gödel. English translation by John Dawson of this review. Collected Works, Volume I, Publications 1929–1936, by Kurt Gödel, edited by Solomon Feferman, John W. DawsonJr., Stephen C. Kleene, Gregory H. Moore, Robert M. Solovay, and Jean van Heijenoort, Clarendon Press, Oxford University Press, New York and Oxford1986, pp. 257, 259. - Kurt Gödel. Review of Church's A set of postulates for the foundation of logic (second paper) (3596). Collected Works, Volume I, Publications 1929–1936, by Kurt Gödel, edited by Solomon Feferman, John W. DawsonJr., Stephen C. Kleene, Gregory H. Moore, Robert M. Solovay, and Jean van Heijenoort, Clarendon Press, Oxford University Press, New York and Oxford1986, pp. 380, 382. (Reprinted from Zentralblatt für Mathematik und ihre Grenzgebiete, vol. 8 (1934), p. 289.) - Kurt Gödel. English translation by John Dawson of this review. Collected Works, Volume I, Publications 1929–1936, by Kurt Gödel, edited by Solomon Feferman, John W. DawsonJr., Stephen C. Kleene, Gregory H. Moore, Robert M. Solovay, and Jean van Heijenoort, Clarendon Press, Oxford University Press, New York and Oxford1986, pp. 381, 383. - Kurt Gödel. Review of Church's A proof of freedom from contradiction (3598). Collected Works, Volume I, Publications 1929–1936, by Kurt Gödel, edited by Solomon Feferman, John W. DawsonJr., Stephen C. Kleene, Gregory H. Moore, Robert M. Solovay, and Jean van Heijenoort, Clarendon Press, Oxford University Press, New York and Oxford1986, pp. 398, 400. (Reprinted from Zentralblatt für Mathematik und ihre Grenzgebiete, vol. 12 (1936), pp. 241–242.) - Kurt Gödel. English translation by John Dawson of thisreview. Collected Works, Volume I, Publications 1929–1936, by Kurt Gödel, edited by Solomon Feferman, John W. DawsonJr., Stephen C. Kleene, Gregory H. Moore, Robert M. Solovay, and Jean van Heijenoort, Clarendon Press, Oxford University Press, New York and Oxford1986, pp. 399, 401. - Stephen C. Kleene. Introductory note to 1932k, 1934e and 1936b. Collected Works, Volume I, Publications 1929–1936, by Kurt Gödel, edited by Solomon Feferman, John W. DawsonJr., Stephen C. Kleene, Gregory H. Moore, Robert M. Solovay, and Jean van Heijenoort, Clarendon Press, Oxford University Press, New York and Oxford1986, pp. 256– 257.

1990 ◽  
Vol 55 (1) ◽  
pp. 345-345
Author(s):  
Martin Davis

Kurt Gödel. Diskussion zur Grundlegung der Mathematik (1931a). A reprint of 4184. Collected Works, Volume I, Publications 1929– 1936, by Kurt Gödel, edited by Solomon Feferman, John W. DawsonJr., Stephen C. Kleene, Gregory H. Moore, Robert M. Solovay, and Jean van Heijenoort, Clarendon Press, Oxford University Press, New York and Oxford1986, pp. 200, 202. - Kurt Gödel. Discussion on providing a foundation for mathematics (1931a). English translation by John Dawson of the preceding. Collected Works, Volume I, Publications 1929– 1936, by Kurt Gödel, edited by Solomon Feferman, John W. DawsonJr., Stephen C. Kleene, Gregory H. Moore, Robert M. Solovay, and Jean van Heijenoort, Clarendon Press, Oxford University Press, New York and Oxford1986, pp. 201, 203. (Reprinted from History and philosophy of logic, vol. 5 (1984), pp. 125-126.) - Kurt Gödel. Nachtrag. A reprint of 4185. Collected Works, Volume I, Publications 1929– 1936, by Kurt Gödel, edited by Solomon Feferman, John W. DawsonJr., Stephen C. Kleene, Gregory H. Moore, Robert M. Solovay, and Jean van Heijenoort, Clarendon Press, Oxford University Press, New York and Oxford1986, pp. 202, 204. - Kurt Gödel. Postscript. English translation by John Dawson of the preceding. Collected Works, Volume I, Publications 1929– 1936, by Kurt Gödel, edited by Solomon Feferman, John W. DawsonJr., Stephen C. Kleene, Gregory H. Moore, Robert M. Solovay, and Jean van Heijenoort, Clarendon Press, Oxford University Press, New York and Oxford1986, pp. 203, 205. (Reprinted from History and philosophy of logic, vol. 5 (1984), pp. 127-128.) - John W. Dawson Jr. Introductory note to 1931a, 1932e, f and g. Collected Works, Volume I, Publications 1929– 1936, by Kurt Gödel, edited by Solomon Feferman, John W. DawsonJr., Stephen C. Kleene, Gregory H. Moore, Robert M. Solovay, and Jean van Heijenoort, Clarendon Press, Oxford University Press, New York and Oxford1986, pp. 196– 199.

1990 ◽  
Vol 55 (1) ◽  
pp. 343-343
Author(s):  
Martin Davis

2005 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 132-149 ◽  
Author(s):  
Solomon Feferman

The final two volumes, numbers IV and V, of the Oxford University Press edition of the Collected Works of Kurt Gödel [3]–[7] appeared in 2003, thus completing a project that started over twenty years earlier. What I mainly want to do here is trace, from the vantage point of my personal involvement, the at some times halting and at other times intense development of the Gödel editorial project from the first initiatives following Gödel's death in 1978 to its completion last year. It may be useful to scholars mounting similar editorial projects for other significant figures in our field to learn how and why various decisions were made and how the work was carried out, though of course much is particular to who and what we were dealing with.My hope here is also to give the reader who is not already familiar with the Gödel Works a sense of what has been gained in the process, and to encourage dipping in according to interest. Given the absolute importance of Gödel for mathematical logic, students should also be pointed to these important source materials to experience first hand the exercise of his genius and the varied ways of his thought and to see how scholarly and critical studies help to expand their significance.Though indeed much has been gained in our work there is still much that can and should be done; besides some indications below, for that the reader is referred to [2].


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document