scholarly journals Cardiovascular Responses to Repetitive McKenzie Lumbar Spine Exercises

2001 ◽  
Vol 81 (9) ◽  
pp. 1524-1533 ◽  
Author(s):  
Saud Al-Obaidi ◽  
Joseph Anthony ◽  
Elizabeth Dean ◽  
Nadia Al-Shuwai

Abstract Background and Purpose. Repetitive exercises of the type recommended by McKenzie for the lumbar spine, such as flexion and extension exercises in standing (FIS and EIS) and lying positions (FIL and EIL), have been used in the management of low back pain for over 20 years. The cardiovascular effects of exercises that involve postural stabilization and the arms and of exercises performed in a lying position are well known. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to examine the cardiovascular effects of 4 exercises used in the McKenzie system. Subjects and Methods. One hundred subjects without cardiovascular or cardiopulmonary disease (mean age=31 years, SD=6.1, range=22–44) and who were representative of people susceptible to low back pain were studied. Subjects were randomly assigned to 1 of 4 exercise groups (ie, FIS, EIS, FIL, and EIL). Subjects performed sets of 10, 15, and 20 repetitions of the assigned exercise, with a 15-minute rest between sets. Heart rate, blood pressure, and rate-pressure product (an index of myocardial work) were recorded before and after each set of repetitions. Results. After 10 repetitions, flexion and extension in lying were more hemodynamically demanding than in standing. This trend persisted for 15 and 20 repetitions; however, at 20 repetitions, the hemodynamic demands were different across exercise groups (ie, FIL>EIL>FIS>EIS). Discussion and Conclusion. Repetitive exercises of the type suggested by McKenzie for the lumbar spine can have cardiovascular effects in people with no cardiovascular or cardiopulmonary conditions. These effects may be important with respect to cardiac work, and patients for whom these exercises are indicated should have a cardiac and pulmonary risk factor assessment to determine whether heart rate and blood pressure should be monitored.

Author(s):  
Angélica Castilho Alonso ◽  
Michele Figueira Nunes ◽  
Flávia Domingues Alves ◽  
Michele Oio Rodrigues de Souza ◽  
Cristina Prota ◽  
...  

Background: The chronic low back pain (LBP) had been considered an important occupational disorder with several strategy available to treatment, however, few studies had been evaluated the treatment combination. Objectives: The aim of present study was compared the effects of combination of crocheting associated to Kinesiotherapy treatment and Kinesiotherapy isolated treatment on function of lumbar spine and pain during achievement of daily life in patients with chronic LBP. Methods: Forty subjects were distributed randomly in two groups: Crochetagem + Kinesioterapy (C; n: 18; 47.5 ± 7.75 years) and Kinesiotherapy (K, n: 18; 45.3 ± 8.93 years). The C group was treated by crocheting technique associated with kinesiotherapy using therapeutic ball. The K group performed a kinesiotherapy treatment using just a therapeutic ball. The following parameters were evaluated: abdominal strength, articular range motion and the data of Rolland Morris and Oswestry Disability Index questionnaires were evaluated before and after 8 weeks of treatment. Both groups performed all therapeutic sessions for 50 minutes, three times a week. Results: Significant differences (p<0.05) were found just on time to trunk flexion and extension, right and left lateral trunk, pain and abdominal strength. However, significant differences on time (p<0.05) was found on Rolland Morris and Oswestry data questionaries parameters just on C group, additionally the values of C group were lower than K group after treatment. Conclusion: Both kinesiotherapy isolated and association of crocheting and kinesiotherapy were useful to improve functional parameters, however the data from Rolland Morris and Oswestry questionaries were lower just on crocheting associated to kinesiotherapy group indicating increment on function of lumbar spine and decrease on pain during achievement of daily life.


Author(s):  
Ryo Kanematsu ◽  
Junya Hanakita ◽  
Toshiyuki Takahashi ◽  
Manabu Minami ◽  
Kazuhiro Miyasaka ◽  
...  

2005 ◽  
Vol 2 (6) ◽  
pp. 670-672 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel K. Resnick ◽  
Tanvir F. Choudhri ◽  
Andrew T. Dailey ◽  
Michael W. Groff ◽  
Larry Khoo ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document