Short-Term Results of Single-Anastomosis Gastric Bypass After Failed Sleeve Gastrectomy

QJM ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 114 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Alaa Abbas Sabry ◽  
Karim Sabry Abd-Elsamee ◽  
Mohamed Ibrahim Mohamed ◽  
Mohammed Mohamed Ahmed Abd-Elsalam
Keyword(s):  
Weight Loss ◽  
Gastric Bypass ◽  
Sleeve Gastrectomy ◽  
Weight Regain ◽  
Revisional Surgery ◽  
One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass ◽  
Short Term ◽  
Multicenter Studies ◽  
Metabolic Outcomes

Abstract Background It is already known that Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) has gained popularity as a stand-alone procedure with good short-term results for weight loss. However, in the long-term, weight regain is considered as a complication. Demand for secondary surgery is rising, partly for this reason, but through that study we try to discover the efficacy of conversion of failed sleeve gastrectomy to one anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) regarding weight loss and metabolic outcomes. Objective To asses the efficacy and safety of one anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) as a conversion surgery post Sleeve Gastrectomy failure as regard weight loss and metabolic outcomes. Patients and Methods This study is a retrospective cohort study which included 20 patients underwent one anastomosis gastric bypass at Ain-Shams University El-Demerdash Hospital, Cairo, Egypt and specialized bariatric center, Cairo, Egypt From February 2019 to July 2019 with 6 months of postoperative follow up till January 2019. Results In this study, we reviewed and analyzed the outcomes from the revision of the SG due to either inadequate weight loss or weight regain to one anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) with %EBWL of 6.65% at 1 month, 13.61 % at 3 months and 20.86% at 6 months. Conclusion OAGB appears to be an effective and safe therapeutic technique as a revisional surgery for failed primary SG with good short-term results for treating morbid obesity and its associated comorbidities with a significantly low rate of complications. However the EBWL was less than what is reported after primary OAGB weight. Multicenter studies with larger series of patients and longer term follow up after SG revisions to OAGB are warranted.

scholarly journals Single Anastomosis Duodeno-ileostomy (SADI-S) Versus One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass (OAGB-MGB) as Revisional Procedures for Patients with Weight Recidivism After Sleeve Gastrectomy: a Comparative Analysis of Efficacy and Outcomes

2020 ◽  
Vol 30 (12) ◽  
pp. 4715-4723
Author(s):  
Moataz Bashah ◽  
Ammar Aleter ◽  
Jawher Baazaoui ◽  
Ayman El-Menyar ◽  
Antonio Torres ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Weight Loss ◽  
Gastric Bypass ◽  
Sleeve Gastrectomy ◽  
Bile Reflux ◽  
One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass ◽  
Nutritional Deficiencies ◽  
Gastrointestinal Complications ◽  
Weight Recidivism ◽  
Single Anastomosis

Abstract Purpose Many revisional procedures are available for unsuccessful laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) in patients with complications or weight recidivism. Single anastomosis duodeno-ileal bypass (SADI-S) and one anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB-MGB) are two revisional procedures to address the problem of weight recidivism. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and outcomes of the 2 revisional approaches (SADI-S vs. OAGB-MGB). Materials and Methods A retrospective analysis of prospectively collected database of patients who underwent SADI-S or OAGB-MGB as a revisional procedure for weight recidivism after primary LSG with a minimum 1-year follow-up. Weight loss, comorbidities, nutritional deficiencies, complications, and outcomes were compared in the 2 procedures. Results Ninety-one patients were included in the study (42 SADI-S and 49 OAGB-MGB). There was a significant weight loss (total weight loss percentage, TWL%) at 1-year follow-up observed for SADI-S when compared to OAGB-MGB (23.7 ± 5.7 vs. 18.7 ± 8.5, p = 0.02). However, this difference was not statistically significant at 18 months (26.4 ± 7.3 vs. 21.2 ± 11.0, p = 0.25). Remission of comorbidities (diabetes mellitus and hypertension) was comparable. Although OAGB-MGB had higher complication rate than SADI-S, the difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.39). No mortality was reported in the study groups. Conclusion Both SADI-S and OAGB-MGB are effective and safe revisional procedures for weight regain after LSG. The short-term outcomes are comparable; however, SADI-S is associated with less upper gastrointestinal complications and could be a better option for patients suffering from GERD post-LSG. Moreover, the underlying bile reflux may get worse with OAGB-MGB. However, further prospective larger studies are needed.

scholarly journals Efficacy and Drawbacks of Single-Anastomosis Duodeno-Ileal Bypass After Sleeve Gastrectomy in a Tertiary Referral Bariatric Center

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Arnaud Liagre ◽  
Francesco Martini ◽  
Yves Anduze ◽  
Hubert Boudrie ◽  
Olivier Van Haverbeke ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Weight Loss ◽  
Sleeve Gastrectomy ◽  
Weight Regain ◽  
Postoperative Mortality ◽  
Short Term ◽  
Postoperative Complication Rate ◽  
Single Anastomosis ◽  
Biochemical Assessment ◽  
Ileal Bypass

Abstract Background The need for revisional procedures after sleeve gastrectomy (SG) for insufficient weight loss or weight regain, gastroesophageal reflux, or other complications is reported to be 18–36% in studies with 10-year follow-up. Single-anastomosis duodeno-ileal bypass (SADI) may be performed as a revisional procedure after SG. This study aims to evaluate the short- and mid-term outcomes of SADI after SG in a referral center for bariatric surgery. Materials and Methods Data of patients who underwent SADI between March 2015 and March 2020 were collected prospectively and analyzed retrospectively. Follow-up comprised clinical and biochemical assessment at 1, 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months postoperatively, and once a year thereafter. Results Overall, 106 patients underwent SADI after a previous SG. The timeframe between SG and SADI was 50 ± 31.3 months. Postoperative mortality was observed in two cases (1.8%) and morbidity in 15.1% of patients. At 24 months, %total weight loss was 37.6 ± 12.3 and %excess weight loss 76.9 ± 25.2 (64 patients). Three patients were treated for malnutrition during follow-up, two with medical treatment and one with SADI reversal. Conclusion SADI after SG provides effective weight loss results in the short-term, even if in the present series the postoperative complication rate was non-negligible. Further trials are needed to establish the more advantageous revisional bariatric procedure after failed SG.

scholarly journals One anastomosis gastric bypass vs. Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, remedy for insufficient weight loss and weight regain after failed restrictive bariatric surgery

2020 ◽  
Vol 30 (9) ◽  
pp. 3287-3294 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nathan Poublon ◽  
Ibtissam Chidi ◽  
Martijn Bethlehem ◽  
Ellen Kuipers ◽  
Ralph Gadiot ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Weight Loss ◽  
Gastric Bypass ◽  
Complication Rate ◽  
Weight Regain ◽  
Surgical Intervention ◽  
One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass ◽  
Procedure Time ◽  
Insufficient Weight Loss ◽  
Restrictive Surgery

Abstract Background Failure occurs in up to 60% of the patients that were treated with primary restrictive bariatric operations such as Laparoscopic Adjustable Gastric Banding (LAGB), or restrictive/metabolic operations like Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy (LSG). Insufficient weight loss and weight regain are the most commonly reported reasons of failure. The aim of this retrospective multicenter study was to compare One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass (OAGB) to Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass (RYGB) as a revisional procedure in terms of weight loss, procedure time, complication rate and morbidity. Methods 491 patients operated on between 2012 and 2017 for failed restrictive surgery were included in this study (OAGB (n=185) or RYGB (n=306)). Failure was defined as total weight loss (TWL) less than 25%, excess weight loss (EWL) less than 50% and/or a remaining body mass index (BMI) larger than 40 kg/m2 at two years of follow up. Primary outcome measures were %TWL and % excess BMI loss (EBMIL) at 12, 24 and 36 months of follow-up. Secondary outcomes were procedure time, reduction of comorbidity, early and late complication rate, and mortality. Results %TWL was significantly larger in the OAGB group at 12 months (mean 24.1±9.8 vs. 21.9±9.7, p = 0.023) and 24 months (mean 23.9±11.7 vs. 20.5±11.2, p = 0.023) of follow-up. %EBMIL was significantly larger in the OAGB group at 12 months (mean 69.0±44.6 vs. 60.0±30.1, p = 0.014) and 24 months (mean 68.6±51.6 vs. 56.4±35.4, p = 0.025) of follow-up. Intra-abdominal complications (leakage, bleeding, intra-abdominal abscess and perforation) occurred less frequently after revisional OAGB (1.1% vs. 4.9%, p = 0.025). Surgical intervention for biliary reflux (5.4% vs. 0.3%, p < 0.001) was more prevalent in the OAGB group. Surgical intervention for internal herniation (0.0% vs. 4.9%, p = 0.002) was more prevalent in the RYGB group. Conclusions This study suggests that OAGB is superior to RYGB as a remedy for insufficient weight loss and weight regain after failed restrictive surgery with more weight loss and a lower early complication rate. To substantiate these findings, further research from prospective randomized controlled trials is needed.

scholarly journals 1139 Effectiveness of One-Anastomosis Gastric Bypass Vs Sleeve Gastrectomy in Short- And Long-Term Weight Loss – A Review

2021 ◽  
Vol 108 (Supplement_6) ◽  
Author(s):  
A A Jothi
Keyword(s):  
Bariatric Surgery ◽  
Weight Loss ◽  
Gastric Bypass ◽  
Sleeve Gastrectomy ◽  
One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass ◽  
Mini Gastric Bypass ◽  
Short Term ◽  
Efficient Treatment ◽  
Short And Long Term

Abstract Aim Bariatric surgery has been the most efficient treatment option for moderate to severe obesity. Recently, the sleeve gastrectomy (SG) has become the most widely performed bariatric surgery. However, the one-anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) has exponentially increased recently and is associated with excellent short- and long-term weight loss benefits. Hence, the aim of this review is to compare the effectiveness of OAGB vs SG in short- (≤ 1 year) and long-term (&gt; 1 year) weight loss. Method A comprehensive literature search of PubMed, Scopus and Google Scholar databases were conducted. Search criteria included keywords such as one-anastomosis gastric bypass, mini-gastric bypass, omega-loop gastric bypass, sleeve gastrectomy, short-term weight loss and long-term weight loss. Selection criteria included any randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and cohort studies comparing the effects of OAGB vs SG in weight loss, published from the years 2010 onwards. Only full text studies and papers published in English language were chosen. Results nine studies were selected to be reviewed in this study. 62.5% of studies which had reports for short-term weight loss showed that OAGB was able to achieve a significantly greater % excess weight loss (%EWL) or % excess BMI loss (%EBMIL) (P &lt; 0.05). Whereas 80% of studies which had reports for long-term weight loss showed that OAGB achieved a significantly greater %EWL or %EBMIL, up to five years. Conclusions This review suggests that OAGB is associated with significantly greater short-and long-term weight loss than SG. However, due to the small number of RCTs on OAGB vs SG, more long-term RCTs should be conducted for greater evaluation.

scholarly journals Single Anastomosis Duodenoileal Bypass or Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass After Failed Sleeve Gastrectomy: Medium-Term Outcomes

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Phillip J. Dijkhorst ◽  
May Al Nawas ◽  
Laura Heusschen ◽  
Eric J. Hazebroek ◽  
Dingeman J. Swank ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Weight Loss ◽  
Gastric Bypass ◽  
Sleeve Gastrectomy ◽  
Revisional Surgery ◽  
Complication Rates ◽  
Total Weight Loss ◽  
Micronutrient Deficiencies ◽  
Single Anastomosis

Abstract Background Although the sleeve gastrectomy (SG) has good short-term results, it comes with a significant number of patients requiring revisional surgery because of insufficient weight loss or functional complications. Objective To investigate the effectiveness of the single anastomosis duodenoileal bypass (SADI-S) versus the Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) on health outcomes in (morbidly) obese patients who had previously undergone SG, with up to 5 years of follow-up. Methods Data from patients who underwent revisional SADI-S or RYGB after SG were retrospectively compared on indication of surgery, weight loss, quality of life, micronutrient deficiencies, and complications. Results From 2007 to 2017, 141 patients received revisional laparoscopic surgery after SG in three specialized Dutch bariatric hospitals (SADI-S n=63, RYGB n=78). Percentage total weight loss following revisional surgery at 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 years was 22%, 24%, 22%, 18%, and 15% for SADI-S and 10%, 9%, 7%, 8%, and 2% for RYGB (P<.05 for 1–4 years). Patients who underwent RYGB surgery for functional complications experienced no persistent symptoms of GERD or dysphagia in 88% of cases. No statistical difference was found in longitudinal analysis of change in quality of life scores or cross-sectional analysis of complication rates and micronutrient deficiencies. Conclusion Conversion of SG to SADI-S leads to significantly more total weight loss compared to RYGB surgery with no difference in quality of life scores, complication rates, or micronutrient deficiencies. When GERD in sleeve patients has to be resolved, RYGB provides adequate outcomes. Graphical abstract

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document