scholarly journals 0624 Voice of the Patient: A Patient-Centered Exploration of Factors Influencing Obstructive Sleep Apnea Care

SLEEP ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 43 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. A238-A239
Author(s):  
F M Puravath ◽  
T Ash ◽  
R Rottapel ◽  
C Spadola ◽  
S Bandana ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Obstructive Sleep Apnea ◽  
Sleep Apnea ◽  
Shared Decision Making ◽  
Patient Experience ◽  
Shared Decision ◽  
Patient Centered ◽  
Factors Influencing ◽  
Obstructive Sleep ◽  
Centered Care

Abstract Introduction Despite widely available efficacious treatments for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), patients commonly report frustration in accessing and adhering to treatments. Sparse research has explored factors influencing OSA care from the patient perspective, which may limit provision of patient-centered care: care responsive to patient preferences, needs, and values. To this end, we conducted qualitative research to identify factors, voiced by patients, that influence OSA treatment initiation and adherence. Methods We performed semi-structured interviews with 15 patients previously diagnosed with OSA from Boston, MA and a national patient portal (MyApnea.Org). Patients were asked about barriers and facilitators to their diagnosis and treatment as well as about their preferences and values that informed their treatment decisions. Interviews were audio-recorded and transcribed. A qualitative content analysis was performed to identify themes. After developing a codebook, interviews were coded. Codes were then audited and finalized by study team consensus. Results Our sample was aged 25-74 years; 71% identified as female. Among participants, 57.1% identified as White, 14.3% Black, 14.3% Asian, and 14.3% Other. Major themes were broadly classified as (1) facilitators (provision of useful information on treatment options, participation in shared decision-making, continued clinician support); (2) barriers (inconvenience of treatment, difficulty of habit formation, treatment side effects, competing comorbid conditions); (3) motivators (value of improving chronic health, family support, positive treatment effects); (4) contextual factors (insufficient knowledge/awareness of OSA, navigating healthcare systems, access to informational resources). Awareness of OSA symptoms and treatments, and ongoing support were cited as the most common factors influencing the patient experience. Conclusion This formative research highlights that diverse factors impact the OSA evaluation and treatment patient experience. Further research should test interventions that promote effective patient-centered care for OSA, such as shared decision-making tools. Support Brigham and Women’s Hospital Research Institute Patient-Centered Comparative Effectiveness Research Center Grant

Shared-decision making tool for obstructive sleep apnea

2017 ◽  
Vol 40 ◽  
pp. e83-e84
Author(s):  
A. Duggins ◽  
M. Bergeron ◽  
K. Tiemeyer ◽  
L. Mullen ◽  
J. Crisalli ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Obstructive Sleep Apnea ◽  
Sleep Apnea ◽  
Shared Decision Making ◽  
Shared Decision ◽  
Obstructive Sleep ◽  
Decision Making Tool

The Role of Shared Decision-Making in Audiologic Rehabilitation

2014 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
pp. 15-23 ◽  
Author(s):  
Helen Pryce ◽  
Amanda Hall
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Shared Decision Making ◽  
Behavior Changes ◽  
Shared Decision ◽  
Patient Centered ◽  
Treatment Information ◽  
Centered Care ◽  
Potential Risks ◽  
Audiologic Rehabilitation

Shared decision-making (SDM), a component of patient-centered care, is the process in which the clinician and patient both participate in decision-making about treatment; information is shared between the parties and both agree with the decision. Shared decision-making is appropriate for health care conditions in which there is more than one evidence-based treatment or management option that have different benefits and risks. The patient's involvement ensures that the decisions regarding treatment are sensitive to the patient's values and preferences. Audiologic rehabilitation requires substantial behavior changes on the part of patients and includes benefits to their communication as well as compromises and potential risks. This article identifies the importance of shared decision-making in audiologic rehabilitation and the changes required to implement it effectively.

scholarly journals NSQIP Impacts Patient Experience

2018 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 89-95
Author(s):  
Maria Castaldi ◽  
Geena George ◽  
Pamela Turner ◽  
John McNelis
Keyword(s):  
Risk Assessment ◽  
Decision Making ◽  
Shared Decision Making ◽  
Patient Experience ◽  
Assessment Tool ◽  
Shared Decision ◽  
Patient Centered ◽  
Improvement Project ◽  
National Quality ◽  
Venous Thromboembolic Events

National Quality Improvement Project (NSQIP) semiannual reports (SARs) revealed high observed to expected ratios for venous thromboembolic events (VTEs) on the surgical service. Press Ganey scores identified an area of particular weakness in shared decision-making in patient care. Patients reported little to no participation in shared decision-making. A performance improvement project was developed with a 2-fold objective: decrease the percentages of patients sustaining VTE through adequate screening and prophylaxis (VTEP) and to engage patients in shared decision-making to accept VTEP through enhanced patient-centered discussions and education on the risks and benefits of VTEP. A clinical pathway was developed to implement VTEP using a standardized risk assessment tool. Patient-centered discussion introduced VTEP and impact on perioperative safety. Results included telephone survey, NSQIP SARs, and Press Ganey patient experience survey. Using NSQIP data and a pathway developed for both VTE risk assessment and patient engagement, the authors observe immediate improvements in patient experience and decreased rates of VTE.

scholarly journals Shared Decision Making and Patient-Centered Care in Israel, Jordan, and the United States: Exploratory and Comparative Survey Study of Physician Perceptions (Preprint)

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yaara Zisman-Ilani ◽  
Rana Obeidat ◽  
Lauren Fang ◽  
Sarah Hsieh ◽  
Zackary Berger
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Decision Making ◽  
Shared Decision Making ◽  
The United States ◽  
Patient Centered Care ◽  
Survey Study ◽  
Shared Decision ◽  
Patient Centered ◽  
Centered Care ◽  
Comparative Survey

BACKGROUND Shared decision making (SDM) is a health communication model that evolved in Europe and North America and largely reflects the values and medical practices dominant in these areas. OBJECTIVE This study aims to understand the beliefs, perceptions, and practices related to SDM and patient-centered care (PCC) of physicians in Israel, Jordan, and the United States. METHODS A hypothesis-generating comparative survey study was administered to physicians from Israel, Jordan, and the United States. RESULTS A total of 36 surveys were collected via snowball sampling (Jordan: n=15; United States: n=12; Israel: n=9). SDM was perceived as a way to inform patients and allow them to participate in their care. Barriers to implementing SDM varied based on place of origin; physicians in the United States mentioned limited time, physicians in Jordan reported that a lack of patient education limits SDM practices, and physicians in Israel reported lack of communication training. Most US physicians defined PCC as a practice for prioritizing patient preferences, whereas both Jordanian and Israeli physicians defined PCC as a holistic approach to care and to prioritizing patient needs. Barriers to implementing PCC, as seen by US physicians, were mostly centered on limited appointment time and insurance coverage. In Jordan and Israel, staff shortage and a lack of resources in the system were seen as major barriers to PCC implementation. CONCLUSIONS The study adds to the limited, yet important, literature on SDM and PCC in areas of the world outside the United States, Canada, Australia, and Western Europe. The study suggests that perceptions of PCC might widely differ among these regions, whereas concepts of SDM might be shared. Future work should clarify these differences.

scholarly journals Partnerships to Improve Shared Decision Making for Patients with Hypertension: Health Equity Implications

2019 ◽  
Vol 29 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 97-102
Author(s):  
Aisha T. Langford ◽  
Stephen K. Williams ◽  
Melanie Applegate ◽  
Olugbenga Ogedegbe ◽  
Ronald S. Braithwaite
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Decision Making ◽  
Shared Decision Making ◽  
Health Equity ◽  
Clinical Care ◽  
Lifestyle Changes ◽  
Shared Decision ◽  
Patient Centered ◽  
Broad Array ◽  
Centered Care

Shared decision making (SDM) has increas­ingly become appreciated as a method to enhance patient involvement in health care decisions, patient-provider communication, and patient-centered care. Compared with cancer, the literature on SDM for hyperten­sion is more limited. This is notable because hypertension is the leading risk factor for cardiovascular disease and both conditions disproportionately affect certain subgroups of patients. However, SDM holds prom­ise for improving health equity by better engaging patients in their health care. For example, many reasonable options exist for treating uncomplicated stage-1 hyperten­sion. These options include medication and/ or lifestyle changes such as healthy eating, physical activity, and weight management. Deciding on “the best” plan of action for hypertension management can be challeng­ing because patients have different goals and preferences for treatment. As hyper­tension management may be considered a preference-sensitive decision, adherence to treatment plans may be greater if those plans are concordant with patient prefer­ences. SDM can be implemented in a broad array of care contexts, from patient-provider dyads to interprofessional collaborations. In this article, we argue that SDM has the potential to advance health equity and improve clinical care. We also propose a process to evaluate whether SDM has occurred and suggest future directions for research.Ethn Dis. 2019;29(Suppl 1):97- 102; doi:10.18865/ed.29.S1.97.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document