Intraspecific differences in spring leaf phenology in relation to tree size in temperate deciduous trees

2019 ◽  
Vol 39 (5) ◽  
pp. 782-791 ◽  
Author(s):  
Noriyuki Osada ◽  
Tsutom Hiura
2020 ◽  
Vol 290 ◽  
pp. 108031 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lorène Julia Marchand ◽  
Inge Dox ◽  
Jožica Gričar ◽  
Peter Prislan ◽  
Sebastien Leys ◽  
...  

2006 ◽  
Vol 93 (6) ◽  
pp. 829-839 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. Sack ◽  
P. J. Melcher ◽  
W. H. Liu ◽  
E. Middleton ◽  
T. Pardee

Forests ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (9) ◽  
pp. 1281
Author(s):  
Lenka Sarvašová ◽  
Peter Zach ◽  
Michal Parák ◽  
Miroslav Saniga ◽  
Ján Kulfan

In temperate forests within Europe, early-flushing (EF) deciduous trees are often heavily infested by early spring leaf-eating Lepidoptera, while late-flushing (LF) trees are better protected in a phenological manner against such heavy infestations, as spring moth larvae begin to appear before their bud burst. The associational effects of EF trees on LF ones are only poorly known. We studied whether or not the infestation of LF trees by spring Lepidoptera can be affected by EF ones if they grow in the immediate vicinity. We compared spring assemblages of leaf-eating larvae of Lepidoptera on LF Quercus cerris L. with those on EF Q. pubescens Willd. in several microhabitats in Slovakia, Central Europe. Larvae were collected from mature and young trees. Mature trees sampled were growing: (1) in a closed-canopy forest; (2) in small groups; or (3) as a lone tree. Forest and tree groups are both constituted by oak species. Tree groups and lone trees were 20–50 m distant from forest edges. Young trees were growing (1) under mature Q. pubescens trees in a forest or (2) as a lone tree within forest gaps or near the edges. In the closed-canopy forest where LF trees (Q. cerris) were surrounded by EF ones (Q. pubescens), the caterpillars on mature LF trees were in abundance, almost as on mature EF ones. The species composition of larval assemblages on the two oak species was similar. In contrast, on small groups and on lone trees, the lepidopteran larvae were significantly less abundant on LF trees than EF ones. In the case of young trees, the abundance of larvae and their composition assemblages on both oaks were comparable in the forest. In the open habitat, LF trees were less infested by larvae than EF ones and the assemblages of moth larvae differed between the two. Our results reveal the effect (associational susceptibility) of EF trees on LF ones when growing in a close vicinity. It means that the phenological protection of LF trees may not be sufficient if they grow close to or are surrounded by EF ones.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bertold Mariën ◽  
Inge Dox ◽  
Hans J. De Boeck ◽  
Patrick Willems ◽  
Sebastien Leys ◽  
...  

Abstract. Severe droughts are expected to become more frequent and persistent. However, their effect on autumn leaf senescence, a key process for deciduous trees and ecosystem functioning, is currently unclear. We hypothesized that (I) severe drought advances the onset of autumn leaf senescence in temperate deciduous trees and that (II) tree species show different dynamics of autumn leaf senescence under drought. We tested these hypotheses using a manipulative experiment on beech saplings and three years of monitoring mature beech, birch and oak trees in Belgium. The autumn leaf senescence was derived from the seasonal pattern of the chlorophyll content index and the loss of canopy greenness using generalized additive models and piece-wise linear regressions. Drought did not affect the onset of autumn leaf senescence in both saplings and mature trees, even if the saplings showed a high mortality and the mature trees a high leaf mortality (due to accelerated leaf senescence and early leaf abscission). We did not observe major differences among species. Synthesis: The timing of autumn leaf senescence appears conservative across years and species, and even independent on drought stress. Therefore, to study autumn senescence, seasonal chlorophyll dynamics and loss of canopy greenness should be considered separately.


2002 ◽  
Vol 155 (1) ◽  
pp. 183-195 ◽  
Author(s):  
M.-A. Selosse ◽  
R. Bauer ◽  
B. Moyersoen

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document