Scott, Prof. James Alexander, (3 July 1931–7 May 1997), Regional Medical Officer, Trent Regional Health Authority, 1973–88, retired; Special Professor of Health Care Planning, Nottingham University, since 1974; Professor Associate in Health Service Planning, Department of Community Medicine, Sheffield University, since 1988

2006 ◽  
Vol 12 (3) ◽  
pp. 7
Author(s):  
Hal Swerissen

This issue of the Australian Journal of Primary Health has a strong consumer participation theme. Hegney et al. discuss the extent to which consumers are comfortable with the advance practice role for registered nurses. Johnson et al. tackle the broader role issue of consumer representation and participation in health service planning, management and review. Meehan-Andrews et al. explore the issues involved in getting rural consumer perspectives for health care planning and quality assurance. Pettigrew explores the expectations of older patients and the "senior friendly" hospital.


2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sina Waibel ◽  
Janet Williams ◽  
Yasmin Tuff ◽  
Joanne Shum ◽  
Jennifer Scarr ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Providing access to pediatric healthcare services in British Columbia, Canada, presents unique challenges given low population densities spread across large geographic distances combined with a lack of availability of specialist providers in remote areas, leading to quality of care shortcomings and inequalities in care delivery. The study objective was to develop a framework that provides a common language and methodology for defining and planning child and youth healthcare services across the province. Methods The framework was developed in two phases. In Phase 1, a literature and jurisdictional review was completed using the following inclusion criteria: (i) description of a framework focusing on organizing service delivery systems (ii) that supports health service planning, (iii) includes specialty or subspecialty services and (iv) has been published since 2008. In Phase 2, a series of meetings with key provincial stakeholders were held to receive feedback on the developed Tiers of Service framework versions that were based on the literature and jurisdictional review and adjusted to the British Columbian health care context. The final version was endorsed by the Child Health BC Steering Committee. Results Ten medical articles and thirteen jurisdictional papers met the established selection criteria and were included in this study. Most frameworks were developed by the Australian national or state jurisdictions and published in jurisdictional papers (n = 8). Frameworks identified in the medical literature were mainly developed in Canada (n = 3) and the US (n = 3) and focused on maternity, neonatal, critical care and oncology services. Based on feedback received from the expert group, the framework was expanded to include community-based services, prevention and health determinants. The final version of the Tiers of Service framework describes the specific services to be delivered at each tier, which are categorized as Tier 1 (community services) through Tier 6 (sub-specialized services). Two consecutive steps were identified to effectively use the framework for operational and system planning: (i) development of a ‘module’ outlining the responsibilities and requirements to be delivered at each tier; and (ii) assessment of services provided at the health care facility against those described in the module, alignment to a specific tier, identification of gaps at the local, regional and provincial level, and implementation of quality improvement initiatives to effectively address the gaps. Conclusions The benefits of the Tiers of Service framework and accompanying modules for health service planning are being increasingly recognized. Planning and coordinating pediatric health services across the province will help to optimize flow and improve access to high-quality services for children living in British Columbia.


2002 ◽  
Vol 32 (4) ◽  
pp. 781-798 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nancy North ◽  
Sophie Werkö

In both English and Swedish health care, there is currently much interest in encouraging public consultation and participation in public service planning in order to improve quality, enhance local accountability, and help to inform and legitimize difficult decisions about health care priorities. This article explores the progress of local budget holders for health services in the two countries—primary care groups/trusts in England and county councils and municipalities in Sweden—in developing consultative and participative processes. Using secondary and primary research methods, the study identified much activity among English primary care groups/trusts, although with less certainty of outcome. In Sweden, initiatives were limited to a few county councils, were more distinctive, and in the case of one county council, resulted in the sustained channeling of citizens' views. In comparing and contrasting the approaches in the two countries, the authors note the importance of political cultures and institutional arrangements as well as, more generally, the complexities and challenges of consultation and participation in health care planning.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document