Lactation After Conservative Breast Surgery Combined with Radiation Therapy

1995 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
pp. 40-43 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alan H. Tralins
Mastology ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 28 (s1) ◽  
pp. 9-9
Author(s):  
Thiago Brasileiro de Freitas ◽  
◽  
Kennya Medeiros Lopes de Barros Lima ◽  
Heloísa de Andrade Carvalho ◽  
Alexandre Siqueira Franco Fonseca ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 44 (9) ◽  
pp. 1312-1317 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thiago Brasileiro de Freitas ◽  
Kennya Medeiros Lopes de Barros Lima ◽  
Heloísa de Andrade Carvalho ◽  
Patricia de Azevedo Marques ◽  
Fabio Teixeira Belfort Mattos ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 108 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
M Abouelazayem ◽  
M Elkorety ◽  
S Monib

Abstract Background While arm lymphedema following breast cancer treatment is a common complication; breast lymphedema following treatment is not uncommon. Several risk factors were found to contribute to breast lymphedema, Aim: We aimed to provide a systematic review to help avoiding or management of breast lymphoedema Method The search term 'breast lymphedema' was combined with 'breast conservative surgery' and was used to conduct literature research in PubMed and Medline. The term lymphedema was combined with breast, conservative and surgery to search Embase database. All papers published in English were included with no exclusion date limits Results A total of 2155 female patients were included in this review; age ranged from 26 to 90. Mean BMI was 28.4, most of the studies included patients who underwent conservative breast surgery. Incidence of breast lymphedema ranged from 24.8% to 90.4%. Several risk factors were linked to breast lymphedema after conservative breast surgery, such as body mass index (BMI), breast size, tumour size, tumour site, type of surgery and adjuvant therapy. Treatment options focused on decongestive lymphatic therapy, including Manual lymphatic drainage (MLD), self-massaging, compression bras or Kinesio taping. Conclusions Breast lymphedema is a relatively common complication, yet there is no clear consensus on the definition or treatment options.


2000 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
pp. 23-26 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eddy M. Van Der Velden ◽  
Brigitte H. I. M. Drost ◽  
Otto E. Ijsselmuiden ◽  
Abraham M. Baruchin

Introduction: Nipple and areola reconstruction have recently become in demand because more women are having breast surgery because of breast cancer diagnoses. Many methods for reconstructing the nipple and areola of the breast have been described and several treatment methods have been developed to improve the aesthetic results. The purpose of this paper is to describe one method, dermatography, a refined method of medical tattooing and the results obtained from this method. Materials and Methods: Over 10 years, 112 patients were treated with dermatography for nipple and areola reconstructions. Of these, 89 patients had received a unilateral reconstruction and 23 received a bilateral reconstruction. The first dermatographic treatment was given 8–12 months after the last intervention by the plastic surgeon. The average session lasted 45 minutes. Results were assessed by means of a short questionnaire. Results over time were evaluated by comparing pictures from previous sessions. Dermatography uses a modified tattooing called a dermainjector machine. Keloidectomy is the technique used to reduce keloid in postoperative scars. The needles of the dermainjector are positioned at an angle of 70–90 degrees to the scar surface. Small parts of the keloid are removed. At the same time pigmentation is performed. Results: Patients evaluated their results as satisfactory. Pigmentation over 5 years was judged to be stable with minor loss of pigment in only 6% of the patients, all of whom received radiation therapy for their cancer. Dermatography was well tolerated by the patients. None of the patients required local anesthesia. Discussion: Patients receiving total resection of their breasts are getting younger and perceiving the results as a severe deformation of their bodies. Results of reconstruction are judged very critically. We found that our patients considered the general visual aspect of the nipple and areola shape more important, and most of the patients did not consider reconstruction of the actual nipple mound to be necessary.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Megan Fracol ◽  
Neil Fine

The use of radiation therapy for treatment of breast cancer has steadily increased since the 1990s. Plastic surgeons must be prepared to reconstruct patients with prior lumpectomy and radiation now needing salvage mastectomy, as well as the growing number of patients who will go on to need post mastectomy radiation therapy. Operating in the irradiated field presents unique challenges, including but not limited to intra-operative difficulties such as friable vessels when performing autologous-based reconstruction and higher rates of post-operative complications when performing implant-based reconstruction. Reconstructed outcomes are often inferior to the non-irradiated patient and as such the plastic surgeon should be prepared to perform further revision as necessary. This chapter will review indications for radiation therapy, both autologous- and implant-based approaches to reconstructing the irradiated breast and how to manage post-operative complications. This review contains 3 figures, 5 tables, and 75 references. Keywords: radiation, breast irradiation, breast reconstruction, radiation therapy, autologous reconstruction, implant-based reconstruction, revisionary breast surgery, complications


2010 ◽  
Vol 20 (3) ◽  
pp. 113-121
Author(s):  
Musa Kılınç ◽  
Cem Karaali ◽  
Ragıp Kayar ◽  
Murat Çobanoğlu ◽  
Osman Güngör ◽  
...  

2011 ◽  
Vol 01 (S2) ◽  
Author(s):  
André Vallejo da Silva ◽  
Claudinei Destro ◽  
José Celestino Bicalho de Figueiredo

2006 ◽  
Vol 117 (6) ◽  
pp. 1699-1710 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexandre Mendon??a Munhoz ◽  
Eduardo Montag ◽  
Eduardo Gustavo Arruda ◽  
Claudia Aldrighi ◽  
Rolf Gemperli ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document