Intrathecal Sufentanil Dose Response in Nulliparous Patients 

1998 ◽  
Vol 89 (2) ◽  
pp. 364-370 ◽  
Author(s):  
Valerie A. Arkoosh ◽  
Matthew Cooper ◽  
Mark C. Norris ◽  
Louis Boxer ◽  
Fazeela Ferouz ◽  
...  

Background Intrathecal sufentanil provides effective analgesia during the first stage of labor. A range of doses has been reported to provide adequate pain relief. This study determined the dose of intrathecal sufentanil that produced acceptable pain relief in 50% of nulliparous patients (ED50) who requested labor analgesia. Methods With institutional review board approval, 50 nulliparous patients requesting spinal opioid labor analgesia were enrolled into this prospective, randomized, double-blinded study. Each patient was in spontaneous labor at <5 cm cervical dilation. Patients received one of the following doses of intrathecal sufentanil: 1, 2, 3, 5, or 10 microg in 3 ml preservative-free saline (n = 10 for each dose). Pain, pain relief, hemodynamic, respiratory, and side effect data were collected at times 0, 2, 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, and 30 min. Probit analysis of the number of patients in each group who requested additional pain medicine at 30 min was used to determine the ED50. Results The groups were demographically similar. The ED50 of intrathecal sufentanil was 1.8 microg (SE, 0.6 microg; 95% CI, 2.96 to 0.54 microg). The incidence of side effects was similar among the groups. Conclusions This is the first study to determine the ED50 of intrathecal sufentanil in spontaneously laboring nulliparous patients. As dose-response curves are determined for other labor analgesics, future studies can compare equianalgesic doses or dose combinations.

1987 ◽  
Vol 41 (1) ◽  
pp. 79 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter Ihm ◽  
Hans-Georg Muller ◽  
Thomas Schmitt

Pain Medicine ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 18 (11) ◽  
pp. 2235-2247 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sven Schröder ◽  
Gesa Meyer-Hamme ◽  
Thomas Friedemann ◽  
Sebastian Kirch ◽  
Michael Hauck ◽  
...  

1974 ◽  
Vol 52 (4) ◽  
pp. 791-796 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. R. Martel ◽  
J. Klicius ◽  
F. Herr

The large variation in the severity of the arthritic response of the adjuvant-injected rat often makes it impossible to obtain statistically manageable dose–response curves with anti-inflammatory drugs. Consequently, the relative potency of anti-inflammatory drugs generally was not established. In the present study, with a modification of the therapeutic test, reliable dose–response curves were obtained with seven anti-inflammatory drugs. With this method the "therapeutic" mean effective dose (ED50) and relative potency were calculated by probit analysis. Charles River rats were injected in the left hind paw with adjuvant. On day 14, rats with an injected paw volume of 4–6 ml that increased by at least 0.5 ml between days 10 and 14 were selected for drug treatment. Groups of 6–12 rats with a mean injected paw volume of 5–5.5 ml were formed. Dosing with compounds was started on day 14 and continued daily until day 22 (nine injections). Ninety-four percent of the arthritic control rats showed a further increase in injected paw size between days 14 and 22 (mean, 1.06 ± 0.12 ml) whereas rats dosed with anti-inflammatory compounds showed a dose-related decrease in paw size during the same period. A decrease of 0.5 ml or more between days 14 and 22 was considered to be a therapeutic effect, smaller decreases were taken as no effect. The oral ED50's in milligrams per kilogram were indomethacin, 0.22 ± 0.05; prednisolone, 3.49 ± 1.0; hydrocortisone, 12.4 ± 3.0; phenylbutazone, 13.27 ± 2.7; mefenamic acid 20.10 ± 5.8; aminopyrine, 129.95 ± 25.3; and aspirin, 279.0 ± 24.6. Except for aspirin, the relative potency of the compounds studied by this therapeutic test (chronic) was comparable to that reported for the acute carrageenin assay. Aspirin appears to be markedly less active in chronic inflammation than in acute. This finding is consistent with both experimental and clinical observations.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document