ERP evidence of MI activation without motor response execution

Neuroreport ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 15 (13) ◽  
pp. 2067-2070 ◽  
Author(s):  
Santiago Galdo-Álvarez ◽  
María T. Carrillo-de-la-Peña
2021 ◽  
Vol 215 ◽  
pp. 103290
Author(s):  
Rachel L. Driscoll ◽  
Elizabeth M. Clancy ◽  
Mark J. Fenske

2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (3) ◽  
pp. e36
Author(s):  
Robert Roman ◽  
Milan Brázdil ◽  
Jan Chládek ◽  
Ivan Rektor ◽  
Pavel Jurák ◽  
...  

2010 ◽  
Vol 121 (10) ◽  
pp. 1711-1718 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kentaro Yamanaka ◽  
Yoshiharu Yamamoto

2011 ◽  
Vol 32 (2) ◽  
pp. 103-109 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Houlihan ◽  
Robert M. Stelmack

This article explores the contribution of differences in motor response initiation and execution to the biological bases of extraversion. Specifically, we examined individual differences in the lateralized readiness potential (LRP) for introverts and extraverts under conditions influencing stimulus evaluation time prior to response execution, i.e., stimulus information value and tonal complexity. The salient effects were longer stimulus-locked LRP and shorter response-locked LRP for extraverts than introverts to simple imperative stimuli to respond. The present studies (1) confirm that extraverts initiate movement faster and are less efficient than introverts in the processing of simple stimulus signals to respond and (2) endorse the view differences in sensory-motor processing are important determinants of variation in Extraversion.


2003 ◽  
Vol 17 (3) ◽  
pp. 113-123 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jukka M. Leppänen ◽  
Mirja Tenhunen ◽  
Jari K. Hietanen

Abstract Several studies have shown faster choice-reaction times to positive than to negative facial expressions. The present study examined whether this effect is exclusively due to faster cognitive processing of positive stimuli (i.e., processes leading up to, and including, response selection), or whether it also involves faster motor execution of the selected response. In two experiments, response selection (onset of the lateralized readiness potential, LRP) and response execution (LRP onset-response onset) times for positive (happy) and negative (disgusted/angry) faces were examined. Shorter response selection times for positive than for negative faces were found in both experiments but there was no difference in response execution times. Together, these results suggest that the happy-face advantage occurs primarily at premotoric processing stages. Implications that the happy-face advantage may reflect an interaction between emotional and cognitive factors are discussed.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document