The New Injury Severity Score Is a Better Predictor of Extended Hospitalization and Intensive Care Unit Admission Than the Injury Severity Score in Patients With Multiple Orthopaedic Injuries

2003 ◽  
Vol 17 (7) ◽  
pp. 508-512 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zsolt J. Balogh ◽  
Endre Varga ◽  
János Tomka ◽  
Gábor Süveges ◽  
László Tóth ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Intensive Care Unit Admission ◽  
Injury Severity Score ◽  
Severity Score ◽  
Injury Severity ◽  
New Injury Severity Score ◽  
Orthopaedic Injuries

scholarly journals (A127) Major Trauma in a Swedish Paediatric Population – A Survey of Children Admitted to a Neuro Intensive Care Unit (NICU)

2011 ◽  
Vol 26 (S1) ◽  
pp. s36-s36
Author(s):  
L.E. Franzén
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Injury Severity Score ◽  
Severity Score ◽  
Major Trauma ◽  
Injury Severity ◽  
Good Survival ◽  
Severe Injuries ◽  
Severity Of Injury ◽  
Trauma Score

PurposeTo describe the demographics, mechanism, pattern, and severity of injury, prehospital and hospital care (first 24 hours) and the patient outcome in severely injured children in a NICU. This study was made to complete the study of Swedish children admitted to a paediatric intensive care unit (PICU) due to major trauma in the same region and during the same period.MethodThe medical records of 124 traumatized children (0–16 years of age), admitted to the NICU in Gothenburg 1992–2001, were retrospectively examined. The Injury Severity Score (ISS), Glasgow Paediatric Coma Scale (GSC), Revised Trauma Score (T-RTS/RTS), Paediatric Trauma Score (PTS), Trauma Score Injury Severity Score (TRISS) and Paediatric Risk of Mortality Score (PRISM) estimated the severity of injury.ResultsAbout 7/100 000 children with severe injuries were admitted to the NICU each year from 1992–2001 inclusive. Epidemiology showed a similar pattern as in other OECD countries. Severity of injury was recorded as an ISS median of 17. Mortality rate in our series was 6%.ConclusionMajor trauma with admission to a NICU is rare in Swedish children. With management in conjunction with a pediatric centre, these children have a good survival rate.

scholarly journals Severity of trauma victims admitted in intensive care units: comparative study among different indexes

2009 ◽  
Vol 17 (6) ◽  
pp. 1037-1042 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lilia de Souza Nogueira ◽  
Regina Marcia Cardoso de Sousa ◽  
Cristiane de Alencar Domingues
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care ◽  
Length Of Stay ◽  
Injury Severity Score ◽  
Intensive Care Units ◽  
Severity Score ◽  
Injury Severity ◽  
New Injury Severity Score ◽  
Saps Ii ◽  
Logistic Organ Dysfunction ◽  
Trauma Victims

This study compared the performance of the Injury Severity Score (ISS) with the New Injury Severity Score (NISS) and also the Simplified Acute Physiology Score II (SAPS II) with the Logistic Organ Dysfunction System (LODS) in trauma victims, in order to predict mortality and length of stay in Intensive Care Units (ICU), besides identifying which indexes have been the most effective to estimate these results. A retrospective analysis was done in the records of 185 victims admitted in ICU between June and December 2006. None of the four indexes properly discriminated the patients according to length of stay at the ICU. The ISS and the NISS did not show a good discriminating capacity in case of death, but the SAPS II and the LODS presented good performance to estimate mortality at the ICU. Results pointed towards the use of SAPS II and LODS when trauma victims are admitted in an ICU.

scholarly journals Schockraum- und Schwerverletztenversorgung als „Verlustgeschäft“

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas Gross ◽  
Felix Amsler
Keyword(s):  
Injury Severity Score ◽  
Severity Score ◽  
Injury Severity ◽  
Diagnosis Related Groups ◽  
Case Mix ◽  
Multivariate Analyse ◽  
New Injury Severity Score ◽  
Case Mix Index

Zusammenfassung Hintergrund Es galt herauszufinden, wie kostendeckend die Versorgung potenziell Schwerverletzter in einem Schweizer Traumazentrum ist, und inwieweit Spitalgewinne bzw. -verluste mit patientenbezogenen Unfall‑, Behandlungs- oder Outcome-Daten korrelieren. Methodik Analyse aller 2018 im Schockraum (SR) bzw. mit Verletzungsschwere New Injury Severity Score (NISS) ≥8 notfallmäßig stationär behandelter Patienten eines Schwerverletztenzentrums der Schweiz (uni- und multivariate Analyse; p < 0,05). Ergebnisse Für das Studienkollektiv (n = 513; Ø NISS = 18) resultierte gemäß Spitalkostenträgerrechnung ein Defizit von 1,8 Mio. CHF. Bei einem Gesamtdeckungsgrad von 86 % waren 66 % aller Fälle defizitär (71 % der Allgemein- vs. 42 % der Zusatzversicherten; p < 0,001). Im Mittel betrug das Defizit 3493.- pro Patient (allg. Versicherte, Verlust 4545.-, Zusatzversicherte, Gewinn 1318.-; p < 0,001). Auch „in“- und „underlier“ waren in 63 % defizitär. SR-Fälle machten häufiger Verlust als Nicht-SR-Fälle (73 vs. 58 %; p = 0,002) wie auch Traumatologie- vs. Neurochirurgiefälle (72 vs. 55 %; p < 0,001). In der multivariaten Analyse ließen sich 43 % der Varianz erhaltener Erlöse mit den untersuchten Variablen erklären. Hingegen war der ermittelte Deckungsgrad nur zu 11 % (korr. R2) durch die Variablen SR, chirurgisches Fachgebiet, Intensivaufenthalt, Thoraxverletzungsstärke und Spitalletalität zu beschreiben. Case-Mix-Index gemäß aktuellen Diagnosis Related Groups (DRG) und Versicherungsklasse addierten weitere 13 % zu insgesamt 24 % erklärter Varianz. Diskussion Die notfallmäßige Versorgung potenziell Schwerverletzter an einem Schweizer Traumazentrum erweist sich nur in einem Drittel der Fälle als zumindest kostendeckend, dies v. a. bei Zusatzversicherten, Patienten mit einem hohen Case-Mix-Index oder einer IPS- bzw. kombinierten Polytrauma- und Schädel-Hirn-Trauma-DRG-Abrechnungsmöglichkeit.

scholarly journals Ten years of new injury severity score (NISS): is it a possible change?

2008 ◽  
Vol 16 (2) ◽  
pp. 314-319 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lilia de Souza Nogueira ◽  
Cristiane de Alencar Domingues ◽  
Miriam de Araújo Campos ◽  
Regina Márcia Cardoso de Sousa
Keyword(s):  
Injury Severity Score ◽  
Severity Score ◽  
Injury Severity ◽  
Trauma Studies ◽  
New Injury Severity Score ◽  
Dependent Variables ◽  
Actual Range

The article is a bibliographic review which intends to present the actual range of researches comparing the Injury Severity Score (ISS) and the New Injury Severity Score (NISS). Databases were searched using the keyword NISS, with 42 articles, 23 of which didn't compare the two indexes. Most part of the 19 selected articles showed that NISS has been more accurate in predicting the outcomes (dependent variables) than ISS, moreover in severe and specific trauma. Studies with populations between 1,000 and 10,000 resulted in NISS-favorable results, whereas studies with populations larger than 10,000 or smaller than 1,000 showed either NISS-favorable results or no difference between the two groups. However, there were no studies showing ISS-favorable results. These results and the easier calculation of NISS lead to a future replacement of ISS by NISS.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document