Surgical Management of Angiographically Occult Spinal Dural Arteriovenous Fistulae (Type I Spinal Arteriovenous Malformations): Three Technical Case Reports

Neurosurgery ◽  
1999 ◽  
Vol 44 (4) ◽  
pp. 894-894
Author(s):  
Paul W. Detwiler ◽  
Randall W. Porter ◽  
Cameron G. McDougall ◽  
Robert F. Spetzler
2019 ◽  
Vol 27 (1) ◽  
pp. 32-40
Author(s):  
Yu.M. Samonenko ◽  
D.V. Shchehlov ◽  
O.E. Sviridyuk ◽  
A.V. Naida ◽  
O.V. Slobodian

Objective – to improve the treatment quality for patients with spinal arteriovenous malformations (AVM).Materials and methods. A retrospective analysis of endovascular and surgical treatment of patients was made. In SO «Scientific-practical Center of endovascular neuroradiology NAMS of Ukraine» since 2005 till 2018 were operated 55 patients (34 (61.8 %) men and 21 (38.2 %) women). The age of patients ranged from 11 to 62 years (middle age is 45.3 years). The classification proposed by Anson and Spetzler in 1992 was used in order to divide patients into experimental groups: type I, arteriovenous fistula (AVF); type II, glomus intramedullary AVM; type III, juvenile AVM; and type IV, perimedullary AVF. Patients with type I were 36 (65.5 %), with ІІ type – 10 (18.2 %), with ІIІ type – 5 (9.0 %), with IV type – 4 (7.3 %). For diagnostics were used MRI and spinal angiography. The Aminoff–Logue scale was used for assessment of the neurological deficiency severity. Early postoperative complications (CSF) leakage, wound infection, early postoperative worsening) were counted.Results. 12 (21.8 %) patients were treated using the microsurgical method and 43 (78.2 %) were treated endovascular. We used endovascular and microsurgical methods to treat patients with I type spinal AVM. Microsurgical intervention for 9 (33 %) patients was performed. Complete disconnection of fistula was achieved in 9 patients. Early postoperative complication (CSF leakage) was observed in 1 (11 %) case. Endovascular treatment was performed for 27 (67 %) patients. Total disconnection was achieved in 16 (59 %) cases, 17 patients (63 %) had early transient neurological worsening. Embolization is the first-line treatment for patients with type II AVM – 8 (80 %) patients. Complete obliteration of AVM was attained in 5 patients (62.5 %), 6 (75 %) patients suffered from early worsening of postoperative neurological symptoms. The microsurgical method was used in case of low risk of spinal cord injury in 2 patients (20 %), AVMs were excluded totally in 2 patients and in 1 patient neurological deterioration was stabilized. All patients with III type AVM were treated endovascular. AVM was obliterated complete in 1 patient (20 %). Three (60 %) patients had transient neurological deterioration. Endovascular method was used to treat 3 (75 %) patients with type IV AVM. Totally disconnection of AVM was achieved in 1 (33 %) patient. Super-selective catheterization of all conductive arteries was not possible. Neurological worsening was observed in 1 (33 %) patient.Conclusions. Angiography is the first-line diagnostic method which permits to find the most effective and safe way (endovascular or/and microsurgical treatment) to disconnect AVM from spinal cord bloodstream. Microsurgical intervention helps to achieve eye-controlled total arteriovenous disconnection. Microsurgical technique usage leads to good neurological results – neurological improvement the following day after surgery in all cases of AVM type I treatment. The structure of AVM determines effectiveness, radicality, method of treatment and the level of feeder artery catheterization. The main goal of embolization to achieve the safe catheterization level of the afferent. Multimodal treatment, which includes endovascular and microsurgical methods, is the most effective in case of AVM II and III types.


2006 ◽  
Vol 20 (5) ◽  
pp. 1-17 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yuri P. Zozulya ◽  
Eugene I. Slin'ko ◽  
Iyad I. Al-Qashqish

Object Spinal vascular malformations represent rare and insufficiently studied pathological entities characterized by considerable variation. Insufficient study of this disease is connected with the complexity of its diagnosis, which restricts the development of surgical treatments that are differentiated according to the type of malformation. Great difficulties are caused by the lack of a clear structural–hemodynamic classification of spinal arteriovenous malformations (AVMs). At present the classification created between 1991 and 1998 by the combined efforts of different authors is the most widely used one. According to this classification, four categories are distinguishable: Type I, dural arteriovenous fistulas (AVFs); Type II, intramedullary glomus AVMs; Type III, juvenile or combined AVMs; and Type IV, intradural perimedullary AVFs. Vascular tumors are also classified, as follows: hemangiomas, hemangioblastomas, angiosarcomas, hemangiopericytomas, angiofibromas, angiolipomas, and hemangioendotheliomas, as well as cavernous malformations. Methods In this study the authors analyze the diagnostic data and results of treatment in 91 patients with AVMs and AVFs who were treated at the Institute of Neurosurgery between 1995 and 2005. The patients' ages ranged from 9 to 83 years; the mean age was 42.9 years. For spinal vascular malformations we devised a classification that took into account the aforementioned features of AVMs: the anatomical characteristics of a malformation and its angiostructural and hemodynamic features. In all patients the neuroimaging modalities used in the investigation of their lesions included magnetic resonance (MR) imaging and selective spinal angiography. Three-dimensional computerized tomography angiography studies were obtained in 14 patients, and MR angiography was used in 17. Conclusions For successful surgical treatment of spinal AVMs it is necessary to obtain data about their localization, vascular structure, and hemodynamics that are as complete as possible. This information will promote the use of optimum surgical procedures and the latest methods of microsurgical and endovascular interventions, with treatments differentiated according to the type of malformation. One should try to use the least invasive endovascular approach in these cases,where possible, to occlude the AVM or reduce the intensity of blood flow by means of embolization. To perform an AVM resection or occlusion, one should use a direct approach to the malformation, blocking only the vessels supplying blood to the malformation and preserving the vessels feeding the spinal cord.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document