Validity of Adolescent and Young Adult Self-Report of Papanicolaou Smear Results

2000 ◽  
Vol 96 (4) ◽  
pp. 625-631
Author(s):  
JESSICA A. KAHN ◽  
ELIZABETH GOODMAN ◽  
REBEKAH A. KAPLOWITZ ◽  
GAIL B. SLAP ◽  
S. JEAN EMANS
2001 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 115-115
Author(s):  
Ja Kahn ◽  
E Goodman ◽  
Ra Kaplowitz ◽  
Gb Slap ◽  
Sj Emans

2018 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
pp. 12-23 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jennifer L. Cecilione ◽  
Lance M. Rappaport ◽  
Shannon E. Hahn ◽  
Audrey E. Anderson ◽  
Laura E. Hazlett ◽  
...  

The genetic and environmental contributions of negative valence systems (NVS) to internalizing pathways study (also referred to as the Adolescent and Young Adult Twin Study) was designed to examine varying constructs of the NVS as they relate to the development of internalizing disorders from a genetically informed perspective. The goal of this study was to evaluate genetic and environmental contributions to potential psychiatric endophenotypes that contribute to internalizing psychopathology by studying adolescent and young adult twins longitudinally over a 2-year period. This report details the sample characteristics, study design, and methodology of this study. The first wave of data collection (i.e., time 1) is complete; the 2-year follow-up (i.e., time 2) is currently underway. A total of 430 twin pairs (N = 860 individual twins; 166 monozygotic pairs; 57.2% female) and 422 parents or legal guardians participated at time 1. Twin participants completed self-report surveys and participated in experimental paradigms to assess processes within the NVS. Additionally, parents completed surveys to report on themselves and their twin children. Findings from this study will help clarify the genetic and environmental influences of the NVS and their association with internalizing risk. The goal of this line of research is to develop methods for early internalizing disorder risk detection.


2003 ◽  
Vol 101 (3) ◽  
pp. 490-499
Author(s):  
Jessica A. Kahn ◽  
Elizabeth Goodman ◽  
Bin Huang ◽  
Gail B. Slap ◽  
S. Jean Emans

Author(s):  
Christie M Bielmeier ◽  
Jessica Man

Recently during ski racing competitions, a few high-profile accidents resulted in severe life-threatening laceration injuries. Ski-laceration injuries are caused by metal ski edges cutting through skin/muscles/arteries during falls and range in severity. There is a desire by the racing community to better protect skiers. However, current laceration injury research does not provide detailed information about laceration injuries or focus on adolescent and young adult ski racers. Therefore, the Self-Report Slash Injury Survey (Slash Survey) was conducted to (a) measure the frequency, severity, and body location of laceration injuries during skiing and (b) identify the skiing environment and ski maintenance level during laceration injuries. The Slash Survey was an online survey that asked participants ages 10–24, who are enrolled in US ski race programs, to report whether they experienced a laceration injury and what ski maintenance was used during the 2018–2019 ski season. The Slash Survey results suggest that the laceration injury rate during the 2018–2019 ski season was 6.8% and almost half the lacerations reported were considered slight (i.e. <1 day of absence from the sport). For respondents of the survey, no correlation was found between laceration injuries and (a) slope surface conditions, (b) outside temperature, (c) weather, (d) skiing activity, and (e) ski maintenance (tuning). From the survey, the most common ski tuning method was using a file guide by hand (29%), automated ski tune at a ski shop (20%), stone grind (17%), and cup wheel grinder (17%). Furthermore, open-ended responses suggest that a ski community narrative may be amplifying the awareness of laceration injuries. The aim of this survey was to establish detailed information about ski laceration injuries among adolescent and young adult US ski racers for the development of mitigation strategies.


2018 ◽  
Vol 8 (12) ◽  
pp. 116 ◽  
Author(s):  
Crystal Park ◽  
Sinead Sinnott

Posttraumatic growth has garnered increasing interest as a potential positive consequence of traumatic events and illnesses. However, scientific investigations have yet to demonstrate the validity of self-reports of posttraumatic growth. The most common measure used to assess this construct is the Post Traumatic Growth Inventory (PTGI); however, the extent to which the PTGI (as well as other self-report measures of perceived posttraumatic growth; PPTG) assess actual positive change remains unknown. The present study aimed to examine the validity of PPTG measures. We assessed 83 adolescent and young adult (AYA) cancer survivors at two time points, one year apart. We measured the stability of PTGI from T1 to T2, correlated three measures of PPTG that used different methods (only positive, positive or negative, positive and negative change) with wellbeing measures, and compared PTGI scores with changes in psychosocial resources. PTGI scores were stable over time. More nuanced measures of PPTG appeared to capture more perceived change, although no measure of PPTG was favorably related to wellbeing. Finally, PTGI did not correlate with change in psychosocial resources, with the exception of spirituality. Overall, our results suggest that measures of PPTG do not capture actual positive changes experienced by AYA cancer survivors.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document