Oxytocin Infusion During Second Stage of Labour in Primiparous Women using Epidural Analgesia

1990 ◽  
Vol 45 (7) ◽  
pp. 457
Author(s):  
NIGEL J. ST. G. SAUNDERS ◽  
HELEN SPIBY ◽  
LUCY GILBERT ◽  
ROBERT B. FRASER ◽  
JACQUELINE M. HALL ◽  
...  
BMJ ◽  
1990 ◽  
Vol 300 (6721) ◽  
pp. 399-400
Author(s):  
J S Smoleniec ◽  
D K James

2008 ◽  
Vol 15 (01) ◽  
pp. 101-103
Author(s):  
MUHAMMAD ASGHAR KHAN ◽  
BILAL YASIN ◽  
MONA ZAFFAR ◽  
Shafi ur Rehman

Introduction. The influence of epidural analgesia on the length of labourremains a source of controversy in literature. Objectives. To see the effect of epidural analgesia on the duration ofactive first stage and second stage of labour. Setting: Obstetric Department of CMH Kharian. Period: From 1 January st2005 to 31 March 2006. Material and methods. One hundred pregnant full term, women were included in the study. stFifty primiparous reporting at full term, half were given epidural analgesia the other half were control. Another fiftymultiparous reporting at full term, twenty five women were given epidural the other twenty five were control. Results.The mean duration of active first stage of labour in primiparous women after 3 – 4 centimeter cervical dilatation was5.10 hrs in the epidural group while it was 6.65 hrs in the control group (p less than 0.001). In the multiparous womenthe mean duration of active first stage of labour after 3 – 4 centimeter cervical dilatation was 2.40 hrs in the epiduralgroup while it was 3.43 hrs in the control group (p less than 0.001). In the primiparous women the mean second stagewas 23.76 minutes in the epidural group, and 37.33 minutes in the control group (p less than 0.001). In the multiparousgroup, the mean second stage was 17.58 minutes in the epidural group, and 22.00 minutes in the control group (p lessthan 0.001). Conclusion. Epidural analgesia decreases the duration of active first stage and second stage of labour.


1995 ◽  
Vol 23 (4) ◽  
pp. 459-463 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. J. Paech ◽  
T. J. G. Pavy ◽  
C. Sims ◽  
M. D. Westmore ◽  
J. M. Storey ◽  
...  

A prospective randomized study was Performed to detail clinical experience with both patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) and midwife-administered intermittent bolus (IB) epidural analgesia during labour, under the conditions pertaining in a busy obstetric delivery unit. Both methods used 0.125% bupivacaine plus fentanyl, and similar rescue supplementation although management decisions related to epidural analgesia were made principally by attending midwives One hundred and ninety-eight women were recruited and data analysed from 167 (PCEA n = 82 IB n=85) The groups were demographically similar. Median hourly pain scores, ratings of analgesia and satisfaction did not differ Maximum pain scores were significantly higher in those receiving IB epidural analgesia (P<0.05). The PCEA group had a significantly higher rate of supplementation and bupivacaine use (P<0.01), and a longer duration of the second stage of labour (P<0.03) The relative risk of instrumental delivery with PCEA versus the IB method was 1.57 (CI 1.07–2.38) Experience within our unit with PCEA is contrasted with that of IB epidural analgesia, the method most commonly used; and with that of controlled trials comparing these two methods.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document