Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy for Recurrent Gallstone Pancreatitis During Pregnancy

1996 ◽  
Vol 89 (11) ◽  
pp. 1114-1115 ◽  
Author(s):  
MARCELO ANDREOLI ◽  
SUE KELLY SAYEGH ◽  
RICHARD HOEFER ◽  
GAIL MATTHEWS ◽  
WILLIAM J. MANN
2021 ◽  
Vol 108 (Supplement_7) ◽  
Author(s):  
Neil Donald ◽  
Lavanya Varatharajan ◽  
Kumaran Ratnasingham ◽  
Shashi Irukulla

Abstract Aims Early laparoscopic cholecystectomy is the gold standard for acute cholecystitis and gallstone pancreatitis. In order to deliver this service, a local Emergency Surgical Ambulatory Care (ESAC) pathway with a dedicated ESAC theatre list was established. The aim of this audit was to determine whether ESAC was associated with (1) improved length of stay and (2) cost efficiencies. Methods Consecutive patients who underwent an emergency laparoscopic cholecystectomy between October 2018 to October 2019 were identified. Data related to patient demographics, operating time, complications length of stay (LOS), reason for inpatient stay and re-admissions were collected. A dedicated ESAC service was introduced in July 2020. Outcomes were re-audited (July – December 2020). Results Prior to the introduction of ESAC, 142 patients (42% male, mean age 51 years (range 14 -82 years)) underwent an acute cholecystectomy, of which 13% were discharged on the same day. Median pre-operative LOS was 2 days (range 0-12 days) and median post-operative LOS was 1 day (range 1-16 days). Following the introduction of ESAC, 78 patients (32% male, mean age 49 years (range 22 – 89 years)) underwent an acute cholecystectomy, of which 76% were discharged on the same day and 90% within 1 day. Median pre-operative LOS was 0 days (range 0 to 7 days) and median post-operative LOS was 0 days (range 0-16 days). Conclusions Our results show that the introduction of a dedicated ESAC pathway improved both pre- and post-operative LOS. This subsequently saves approximately £80,000 per annum in hospital bed days.


2008 ◽  
Vol 74 (9) ◽  
pp. 832-833
Author(s):  
Madhavi Meka ◽  
Santosh Potdar ◽  
Peter Benotti ◽  
J. Edward Hartle ◽  
Christopher Senkowski

There is no uniform data regarding prophylactic cholecystectomy in patients undergoing renal transplantation with gallbladder disease. Data analyses suggest that posttransplant patients on cyclosporine have a higher incidence of gallbladder calcifications compared with nonimmunosuppressed patients. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is a relatively safe procedure in modern-day surgery. Taking these facts into consideration, we attempted to compare risks and complications associated with gallbladder disease and eventual cholecystectomy in pretransplant versus post-transplant patients. Between June 1999 and December 2005, 210 renal transplants were performed at our institution. One hundred four patients who had transplants before April 2003 were not screened for gallbladder disease and nine of these patients developed gallbladder disease. These patients form our control group. One hundred six patients who had transplants after April 2003 had pretransplant screening for gallbladder disease and 11 patients were identified with gallbladder disease. These patients form our study group. Nine patients who developed gallbladder disease after renal transplant underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy with three resulting morbidities (33%), two graft losses (22%), and one mortality (11%). There was one mortality (11%) in this group. One patient in the study group died of acute gallstone pancreatitis. Of the 11 patients who were found to have gallbladder disease on screening, nine patients underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy with one morbidity and no mortality or graft loss. Given the relative rarity of the critical events in this study (morbidity, mortality, and graft loss), the definitive statistical value of prescreening for gallbladder disease cannot be established. However, our results are suggestive of clinical value and thus we tentatively recommend ultrasound screening for gallbladder disease for all pretransplant patients and laparoscopic cholecystectomy for those identified to have gallbladder disease.


2012 ◽  
Vol 147 (11) ◽  
pp. 1031 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ann E. Falor ◽  
Christian de Virgilio ◽  
Bruce E. Stabile ◽  
Amy H. Kaji ◽  
Amy Caton ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 108 (Supplement_9) ◽  
Author(s):  
Aleksandra Staniszewska ◽  
Rebekah McCready ◽  
Christopher Grocock ◽  
Rohan Gunasekera ◽  
Mark Hartley ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Current British Society of Gastroenterology guidelines suggest that patients presenting with acute uncomplicated gallstone pancreatitis should ideally undergo laparoscopic cholecystectomy during the index admission or within two weeks of discharge from hospital. COVID-19 pandemic had a significant impact on the delivery of elective and semi-elective surgical services in the National Health Service (NHS) due to limited availability of theatre resources. The aim of this study was to evaluate compliance with the BSG guidelines during the COVID-19 pandemic and the impact of the newly introduced `Hot’ lists at our centre. Methods Patients admitted with first presentation of acute uncomplicated gallstone pancreatitis between 01/03/19 and 25/02/21 were identified from electronic records. Pregnancy and lack of fitness for surgery were the exclusion criteria. Patients admitted between 01/03/19 and 31/12/19 were defined as the pre-COVID cohort. Those admitted between 23/03/20 and 25/02/21 formed the COVID cohort and had access to urgent gallbladder lists. Baseline characteristics, choice of imaging and timing of laparoscopic cholecystectomy were compared between the two cohorts using STATA software. Continuous variables were compared with Mann Whitney test and categorical variables were compared with Pearson’s Chi-Squared test. Results 53 patients were identified in the total cohort with 27 being hospitalised prior to COVID-19 outbreak and 26 presenting after the national lockdown. Baseline characteristics did not differ significantly between the two groups.  Biliary imaging pathway was similar between the two cohorts and importantly there appeared to be no delays in radiological tests during the lockdown. The overall proportion of patients undergoing cholecystectomies remained similar between the two groups and percentage of patients having it during the index admission did not differ. However, patients undergoing cholecystectomy post discharge had a significantly shorter waiting time during the lockdown (p = 0.021) as they were prioritised on the ‘Hot lists’ created to meet the demands of reduced planned theatre service. Conclusions During the 2020 COVID pandemic our service for patients with uncomplicated gallstone pancreatitis continued to be delivered. Despite clinical pressures, there were no notable delays in biliary imaging. The introduction of the urgent operating lists has significantly reduced the time to laparoscopic cholecystectomy following admission for patients with acute uncomplicated gallstone pancreatitis during this period.


1996 ◽  
Vol 172 (3) ◽  
pp. 225-227 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas R. Kelly ◽  
Dan W. Elliott ◽  
Gary C. Vitale

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document