Readiness for HIV Vaccine Trials: Changes in Willingness and Knowledge Among High-Risk Populations in the HIV Network for Prevention Trials

2000 ◽  
Vol 24 (5) ◽  
pp. 451-457 ◽  
Author(s):  
Beryl A. Koblin ◽  
Sarah Holte ◽  
Bill Lenderking ◽  
Patrick Heagerty
2009 ◽  
Vol 25 (2) ◽  
pp. 217-224 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohanarani Suhadev ◽  
Adeline M. Nyamathi ◽  
Soumya Swaminathan ◽  
Anitha Suresh ◽  
P. Venkatesan

AIDS ◽  
1995 ◽  
Vol 9 (11) ◽  
pp. 1279-1284 ◽  
Author(s):  
Denis J. Jackson ◽  
Harold L. Martin ◽  
Job J. Bwayo ◽  
Patrick M. Nyange ◽  
Joel P. Rakwar ◽  
...  

Trials ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Maurine D. Miner ◽  
Linda-Gail Bekker ◽  
Tamara Kredo ◽  
Niresh Bhagwandin ◽  
Lawrence Corey ◽  
...  

AbstractA cornerstone of HIV prevention clinical trials is providing a combination prevention package to all trial participants. The elements included in that standard of care (SoC) package evolve as new prevention modalities are developed. Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) was recommended by the World Health Organization for persons at high risk of acquiring HIV, but not all countries immediately adopted those recommendations. The South African Medical Research Council (SAMRC) convened a summit to discuss issues relating to SoC and PrEP in HIV prevention clinical trials taking place in lower- to middle-income countries (LMIC). Policymakers, regulators, ethicists, experts in law, researchers, representatives of advocacy groups, and the HIV Vaccine Trials Network (HVTN) presented a framework within which SoC principles could be articulated. A group of subject matter experts presented on the regulatory, ethical, scientific, and historic framework of SoC in clinical trials, focusing on PrEP in South Africa. Summit participants discussed how and when to include new HIV treatment and prevention practices into existing clinical guidelines and trial protocols, as well as the opportunities for and challenges to scaling up interventions. The summit addressed challenges to PrEP provision, such as inconsistent efficacy amongst different populations and various biological, virological, and immunological explanations for this heterogeneity. Advocates and community members propagated the urgent need for accessible interventions that could avert HIV infection. The meeting recommended supporting access to PrEP in HIV prevention trials by (1) developing PrEP access plans for HIV vaccine trials, (2) creating a PrEP fund that would supply PrEP to sites conducting HIV prevention trials via a central procurement mechanism, and (3) supporting the safety monitoring of PrEP. This report summarizes the presentations and discussions from the summit in order to highlight the importance of SoC in HIV prevention clinical trials.


2007 ◽  
Vol 8 (4) ◽  
pp. 409-414 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anthony Kebba ◽  
Nesrina Imami ◽  
Daniel Bugembe-Lule ◽  
David Senkaali ◽  
Pontiano Kaleebu ◽  
...  

AIDS ◽  
1998 ◽  
Vol 12 (7) ◽  
pp. 785-793 ◽  
Author(s):  
Beryl A. Koblin ◽  
Patrick Heagerty ◽  
Amy Sheon ◽  
Susan Buchbinder ◽  
Connie Celum ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maurine Miner ◽  
Linda-Gail Bekker ◽  
Tamara Kredo ◽  
Niresh Bhagwandin ◽  
Lawrence Corey ◽  
...  

Introduction: The South African Medical Research Council (SAMRC) convened a summit to discuss issues relating to standard of care (SoC) in HIV prevention clinical trials, both for treatment and prevention of disease. Policymakers, regulators, ethicists, experts in the law (as it pertains to medical research), researchers, representatives of advocacy groups, and the HIV Vaccine Trials Network (HVTN) presented a framework within which SoC principles could be articulated. Discussion: Summit participants discussed how and when to include new modalities of HIV treatment and prevention into existing clinical practice guidelines, and by extension in clinical trial protocols. Participants involved in the execution of care and the scale-up of new interventions, in particular, the roll out of pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP), presented the opportunities for and challenges to scaling up interventions, and their experience with demonstration projects of PrEP. Advocates and community members propagated the need to make interventions that could avert HIV infection available as soon as possible. Experts in evidence-based guideline development discussed the nuances in evaluating evidence for policy and the mechanisms for getting medicines on the Essential Medicines List in South Africa. Given the variability in clinical trial efficacy of PrEP amongst different populations, scientists and statisticians discussed the various biological, virological and immunological reasons for this heterogeneity. Conclusions: Input was given as to the impact of introducing PrEP in other HIV prevention trials, and the considerations for the design of both antiretroviral (ARV)-based and non-ARV based HIV prevention trials. The meeting recommended supporting access to PrEP in HIV prevention trials by 1) developing PrEP access plans for HIV vaccine trials; 2) creating a PrEP fund that would supply PrEP to sites conducting HIV prevention trials via a central procurement mechanism; and 3) support the safety monitoring of PrEP.


2010 ◽  
Vol 21 (3) ◽  
pp. 172-176 ◽  
Author(s):  
H B Jaspan ◽  
N F Soka ◽  
C Mathews ◽  
A J Flisher ◽  
D Mark ◽  
...  

2006 ◽  
Vol 17 (3) ◽  
pp. 176-179 ◽  
Author(s):  
J Smit ◽  
K Middelkoop ◽  
L Myer ◽  
S Seedat ◽  
L-G Bekker ◽  
...  

Research on willingness to participate in HIV vaccine trials is important in preparations for HIV vaccine research, but there are few data from sub-Saharan Africa. We interviewed 198 individuals in a peri-urban South African community immediately after enrolment into an HIV vaccine preparedness study on their willingness to participate in hypothetical vaccine trials. Overall 23% of participants ( n = 46) said that they would be willing to participate in an HIV vaccine trial. Willingness was associated with increasing age, male gender, and increasing knowledge about vaccines generally and HIV vaccines specifically. In multivariate analysis, a 1-unit increase in HIV vaccine knowledge score was associated with a 10-fold increase in willingness to participate (adjusted odds ratio, 10.72, 95% confidence intervals: 4.40–26.12). These results suggest that while willingness to participate in HIV vaccine trials is relatively low in this setting, educational campaigns may have a substantial impact on individuals' willingness to participate in research.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document