Low Back Pain in a General Population. Natural Course and Influence of Physical Exercise–A 5-Year Follow-up of the Musculoskeletal Intervention Center-Norrtälje Study

Spine ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 31 (26) ◽  
pp. 3045-3051 ◽  
Author(s):  
Monica Mortimer ◽  
Gunilla Pernold ◽  
Christina Wiktorin
Keyword(s):  
Low Back Pain ◽  
Back Pain ◽  
General Population ◽  
Physical Exercise ◽  
Natural Course ◽  
Low Back ◽  
Musculoskeletal Intervention

scholarly journals Myofascial trigger-point compression therapy as an adjunct to exercise program is superior in alleviating chronic low back pain compared to exercise program alone

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rawan Masarwa ◽  
Ofir Uri ◽  
Givon Peled ◽  
Gil Laufer ◽  
Gabriel Gutman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Low Back Pain ◽  
Back Pain ◽  
Physical Exercise ◽  
Exercise Program ◽  
Compression Therapy ◽  
Trigger Points ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Low Back ◽  
Myofascial Trigger Points

Abstract Background Current guidelines for the treatment of low back pain (LBP) endorse physical exercise programs and a range of non-pharmacological complementary therapies. Myofascial trigger points (MTrPs) compression therapy is a well-established form of manual therapy, which aims to induce temporary ischemia and over-stimulation of mechanoreceptors over a desired area in order to restore tissue normal functional conditions required for healing response. The purpose of the current study was to evaluate the effect of MTrPs compression therapy as an adjunct to active exercise program in alleviating chronic non-specific low back pain. Methods One-hundred and three patients with chronic non-specific LBP were retrospectively reviewed, 45 of them were treated with MTrPs compression therapy as an adjunct to physical exercise program (MTrPs group) and 58 were treated with exercise program alone (control group). Pain and functional scores were compared before initiating treatment and at 3-month follow-up. Results Pain reduction at 3-month follow-up was 5.6 points (0–10 numerical scale) in the MTrPs group compared to 3.6 points in the control group (p < 0.001). Oswestry Disability Index and SF-12 life quality scores also improved significantly more in the MTrPs group compared to the control group at 3-month follow-up (p < 0.001). Conclusions Myofascial trigger points compression therapy as an adjunct to active exercise program provides superior pain and disability relief to patients with chronic LBP compared to active exercise program alone.

scholarly journals Myofascial trigger-point compression therapy as an adjunct to exercise program is superior in alleviating chronic low back pain compared to exercise program alone- A retrospective non-randomized study.

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rawan Masarwa ◽  
Ofir Uri ◽  
Givon Peled ◽  
Gil Laufer ◽  
Gabriel Gutman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Low Back Pain ◽  
Back Pain ◽  
Physical Exercise ◽  
Exercise Program ◽  
Compression Therapy ◽  
Trigger Points ◽  
Low Back ◽  
Myofascial Trigger Points ◽  
Functional Scores

Abstract Introduction: Current guidelines for the treatment of low back pain (LBP) endorse physical exercise programs and a range of non-pharmacological complementary therapies. Myofascial trigger points (MTP) compression therapy is a well-established form of manual therapy, which aims to induce temporary ischemia and over-stimulation of mechanoreceptors over a desired area in order to restore tissue normal functional conditions required for healing response. The purpose of the current study was to evaluate the effect of MTP compression therapy as an adjunct to active exercise program in alleviating chronic non-specific low back pain.Methods: One-hundred and three patients with chronic non-specific LBP were retrospectively reviewed, 45 of them were treated with MTP compression therapy as an adjunct to physical exercise program and 58 were treated with exercise program alone. Pain and functional scores were compared before initiating treatment and at 3-month follow-up. Results: Pain reduction at 3-month follow-up was 5.6 points (0-10 numerical scale) in the combined treatment group compared to 3.6 points in the exercise program alone group (p<0.01). Oswestry Disability Index improved by 36 and 22 points respectively (p<0.01) and SF-12 life quality score improved by 41 and 29 points respectively (p<0.01). Conclusions: Myofascial trigger points compression therapy as an adjunct to active exercise program provides superior pain and disability relief compared to active exercise program alone for patients with chronic LBP.

Natural course of acute neck and low back pain in the general population: The HUNT study

Pain ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 154 (8) ◽  
pp. 1237-1244 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ottar Vasseljen ◽  
Astrid Woodhouse ◽  
Johan Håkon Bjrngaard ◽  
Linda Leivseth
Keyword(s):  
Low Back Pain ◽  
Back Pain ◽  
General Population ◽  
Natural Course ◽  
Low Back ◽  
Hunt Study

PERCUTANEOUS EPIDURAL NEUROPLASTY (PEN) USING COMBINATION OF HYALURONIDASE AND HYPERTONIC SALINE (NaCl 3%) IN TREATING FAILED BACK SURGERY SYNDROME

2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 1
Author(s):  
Wawan Mulyawan ◽  
Yudi Yuwono Wiwoho ◽  
Syaiful Ichwan
Keyword(s):  
Low Back Pain ◽  
Back Pain ◽  
Hypertonic Saline ◽  
Failed Back Surgery Syndrome ◽  
Favourable Outcome ◽  
Lumbar Spine Surgery ◽  
Low Back ◽  
Failed Back Surgery ◽  
Scale Scores

Background: Following surgical treatments for low back pain, lower extremity pain or neurologic symptoms would last or recur, this is defined as failed sack surgery syndrome (FBSS). FBSS usually occurs in 5-40% of these surgical patients. The most common cause is an epidural scar adhesion. Percutaneous epidural neuroplasty is the non-mechanical treatment for this condition. Previously, the use of hyaluronidase and hypertonic saline separately is commonly used for epidurolysis but the combination of hyaluronidase and hypertonic saline 3% has not been explored.Objective: To investigate the two-year outcomes of percutaneous epidural neuroplasty using a combination of hyaluronidase and hypertonic saline 3% in patients with FBSS.Methods: Twelve patients who experience low back pain, with or without radiculopathy, who have underwent lumbar spine surgery previously were assigned to the study. Parameters, such as the visual analogue scale scores for the back (VAS-B) and legs (VAS-L), and the Oswestry disability index (ODI), were recorded and compared between pretreatment, 1 week, 1 month, 3 months, 1 year and 2 years follow-up.Results: For all 12 patients, the postoperative VAS-B, VAS-L, and ODI were significantly different from the preoperative values in all follow-up periods: 1 month, 3 months, 1 year, and 2 years.Conclusion: Based off this study group, percutaneous epidural neuroplasty using a combination of hyaluronidase and hypertonic saline 3% has a favourable outcome in the 2 years follow-up

scholarly journals Prognosis and Course of Disability in Patients With Chronic Nonspecific Low Back Pain: A 5- and 12-Month Follow-up Cohort Study

2013 ◽  
Vol 93 (12) ◽  
pp. 1603-1614 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karin Verkerk ◽  
Pim A.J. Luijsterburg ◽  
Martijn W. Heymans ◽  
Inge Ronchetti ◽  
Annelies L. Pool-Goudzwaard ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cohort Study ◽  
Low Back Pain ◽  
Prognostic Factors ◽  
Back Pain ◽  
Short Form ◽  
Low Back ◽  
Multidisciplinary Therapy ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Specific Disability

Background Few data are available on the course of and predictors for disability in patients with chronic nonspecific low back pain (CNSLBP). Objective The purpose of this study was to describe the course of disability and identify clinically important prognostic factors of low-back-pain–specific disability in patients with CNSLBP receiving multidisciplinary therapy. Design A prospective cohort study was conducted. Methods A total of 1,760 patients with CNSLBP who received multidisciplinary therapy were evaluated for their course of disability and prognostic factors at baseline and at 2-, 5-, and 12-month follow-ups. Recovery was defined as 30% reduction in low back pain–specific disability at follow-up compared with baseline and as absolute recovery if the score on the Quebec Back Pain Disability Scale (QBPDS) was ≤20 points at follow-up. Potential prognostic factors were identified using multivariable logistic regression analysis. Results Mean patient-reported disability scores on the QBPDS ranged from 51.7 (SD=15.6) at baseline to 31.7 (SD=15.2), 31.1 (SD=18.2), and 29.1 (SD=20.0) at 2, 5, and 12 months, respectively. The prognostic factors identified for recovery at 5 and 12 months were younger age and high scores on disability and on the 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) (Physical and Mental Component Summaries) at baseline. In addition, at 5-month follow-up, a shorter duration of complaints was a positive predictor, and having no comorbidity and less pain at baseline were additional predictors at 12-month follow-up. Limitations Missing values at 5- and 12-month follow-ups were 11.1% and 45.2%, respectively. Conclusion After multidisciplinary treatment, the course of disability in patients with CNSLBP continued to decline over a 12-month period. At 5- and 12-month follow-ups, prognostic factors were identified for a clinically relevant decrease in disability scores on the QBPDS.

Quality of Life in Chronic Low Back Pain: A Comparison with Fibromyalgia and the General Population

2003 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 31-38 ◽  
Author(s):  
Olle Hägg ◽  
Carol Burckhardt ◽  
Peter Fritzell ◽  
Anders Nordwall
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Low Back Pain ◽  
Back Pain ◽  
General Population ◽  
Chronic Low Back Pain ◽  
Low Back
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document