Overcoming Barriers to Delirium Screening in the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit

2018 ◽  
Vol 38 (4) ◽  
pp. 57-67 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gina M. Rohlik ◽  
Karen R. Fryer ◽  
Sandeep Tripathi ◽  
Julie M. Duncan ◽  
Heather L. Coon ◽  
...  

BACKGROUNDDelirium is associated with poor outcomes in adults but is less extensively studied in children.OBJECTIVESTo describe a quality improvement initiative to implement delirium assessment in a pediatric intensive care unit and to identify barriers to delirium screening completion.METHODSA survey identified perceived barriers to delirium assessment. Failure modes and effects analysis characterized factors likely to impede assessment. A randomized case-control study evaluated factors affecting assessment by comparing patients always assessed with patients never assessed.RESULTSDelirium assessment was completed in 57% of opportunities over 1 year, with 2% positive screen results. Education improved screening completion by 20%. Barriers to assessment identified by survey (n = 25) included remembering to complete assessments, documentation outside workflow, and “busy patient.” Factors with high risk prediction numbers were lack of time and paper charting. Patients always assessed had more severe illness (median Pediatric Index of Mortality 2 score, 0.90 vs 0.36; P < .001), more developmental disabilities (moderate to severe pediatric cerebral performance category score, 54% vs 32%; P = .007), and admission during lower pediatric intensive care unit census (median [interquartile range], 10 [9–12] vs 12 [10–13]; P < .001) than did those never assessed (each group, n = 80). Patients receiving mechanical ventilation were less likely to be assessed (41.0% vs 51.2%, P < .001).CONCLUSIONSSuccessful implementation of pediatric delirium screening may be associated with early use of quality improvement tools to identify assessment barriers, comprehensive education, monitoring system with feedback, multidisciplinary team involvement, and incorporation into nursing workflow models.

2020 ◽  
Vol 49 (1) ◽  
pp. 545-545
Author(s):  
Felicia Sifers ◽  
Leslie Hayes ◽  
Amanda Rogers ◽  
Johanna Robbins ◽  
Stephanie Wilson

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amrit Kaur ◽  
Muralidharan Jayashree ◽  
Shankar Prinja ◽  
Ranjana Singh ◽  
Arun K. Baranwal

Abstract Background: Globally, Pediatric Intensive Care Unit (PICU) admissions are amongst the most expensive. This makes it important to gain insights into the cost of pediatric intensive care units. We undertook this study to calculate the health system cost and out of pocket expenditure incurred per patient during Pediatric Intensive Care Unit (PICU) stayMethods: Prospective study conducted in a state of art tertiary level PICU of a teaching and referral hospital. Bottom-up micro costing methods were used to assess the health system cost. Annual data regarding hospital resources used for PICU care was collected from January 2018 to December 2018. Data regarding out of pocket expenditure (OOP) was collected from 299 patients who were admitted from July 2017 to December 2018. The study period was divided into four intervals, each of 4 and a half months duration and data was collected for 1 month in each interval. Per patient and per bed day costs for treatment were estimated both from health system and patient’s perspective. Results: The median (inter-quartile range, IQR) length of PICU stay was 5(3–8) days. Mean ± SD PRISM score of the study cohort was 22.23 ± 7.3. Of the total patients, 55.9% (167) were ventilated. Mean cost per patient treated was US$ 2,078(₹ 144,566). Of this, health system cost and OOP expenditure per patient were US$ 1,731 (₹ 120,425) and 352 (₹ 24,535) respectively. OOP expenditure of a ventilated child was twice that of a non‐ ventilated child. Conclusions: The fixed cost of PICU care were 3.5 times more than variable costs. Major portion of cost is borne by hospital. Severe illness, longer ICU stay and ventilation were associated with increased costs. This study can be used to set the reimbursement package rates under Ayushman Bharat – Pradhan Mantri Jan Arogya Yojana (AB-PMJAY). Tertiary care state of art intensive care in a public sector teaching hospital in India is far less expensive than developed countries.


2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. e369
Author(s):  
Neha Gupta ◽  
Amber Sones ◽  
Maegan Powell ◽  
Johanna Robbins ◽  
Stephanie Wilson ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Ryan L. DeSanti ◽  
Diane H. Brown ◽  
Sushant Srinivasan ◽  
Tom Brazelton ◽  
Michael Wilhelm

Objective: Management of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has required social distancing requirements and personal protective equipment shortages, which have forced hospitals to modify patient care rounds. We describe our process developing telemedicine rounds to maintain synchronous, multidisciplinary, pediatric intensive care unit rounds. By adapting available resources using rapid process improvement (PI), we were able to develop patient- and family-centered video rounds (PFCVR). Design: When rounding team members were forced to work from home, we adapted an existing telemedicine platform (VidyoConnect) to perform PFCVR. A quality improvement (QI) team developed an initial standard process, which underwent rapid PI using a small multidisciplinary team. Setting: A 21-bed, mixed medical/surgical/cardiac pediatric intensive care unit. Participants: Critical care patients, families, physicians, consultants, nurses, and ancillary staff. Interventions: The QI team initially met daily, then weekly, sought feedback from nurses, families, and other care providers, and utilized small tests of change to improve the rounding process. Results: We established standardized, socially distanced rounds using VidyoConnect to allow synchronous, multidisciplinary PFCVR. Implementation of a schedule and rounding script facilitated efficient and effective team communication, optimized participation by the entire team, and decreased interruptions. Conclusions: The COVID-19 pandemic compromised the feasibility of the previous rounding process. PFCVR is a safe and effective tool to facilitate communication while adhering to social distancing guidelines. Use of available platforms and team-based PI is critical for successful implementation.


2016 ◽  
Vol 25 (12) ◽  
pp. 994.1-994
Author(s):  
Jodi Herbsman ◽  
Yasir Al-Qaqaa ◽  
John Corcoran ◽  
Jennifer Daly ◽  
Tiffany Folks ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document