Cultural Differences With End-of-Life Care in the Critical Care Unit

2007 ◽  
Vol 26 (5) ◽  
pp. 194-198 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jessica Doolen ◽  
Nancy L. York
2020 ◽  
Vol 29 (4) ◽  
pp. e81-e91
Author(s):  
Renea L. Beckstrand ◽  
Jasmine B. Jenkins ◽  
Karlen E. Luthy ◽  
Janelle L. B. Macintosh

Background Critical care nurses routinely care for dying patients. Research on obstacles in providing end-of-life care has been conducted for more than 20 years, but change in such obstacles over time has not been examined. Objective To determine whether the magnitude scores of obstacles and helpful behaviors regarding end-of-life care have changed over time. Methods In this cross-sectional survey study, questionnaires were sent to 2000 randomly selected members of the American Association of Critical-Care Nurses. Obstacle and helpful behavior items were analyzed using mean magnitude scores. Current data were compared with data gathered in 1999. Results Of the 2000 questionnaires mailed, 509 usable responses were received. Six obstacle magnitude scores increased significantly over time, of which 4 were related to family issues (not accepting the poor prognosis, intrafamily fighting, overriding the patient’s end-of-life wishes, and not understanding the meaning of the term lifesaving measures). Two were related to nurse issues. Seven obstacles decreased in magnitude, including poor design of units, overly restrictive visiting hours, and physicians avoiding conversations with families. Four helpful behavior magnitude scores increased significantly over time, including physician agreement on patient care and family access to the patient. Three helpful behavior items decreased in magnitude, including intensive care unit design. Conclusions The same end-of-life care obstacles that were reported in 1999 are still present. Obstacles related to family behaviors increased significantly, whereas obstacles related to intensive care unit environment or physician behaviors decreased significantly. These results indicate a need for better end-of-life education for families and health care providers.


Author(s):  
Sriram Yennurajalingam

Culture play a significant role in the care of patients receiving Palliative care. Understanding and managing cultural differences in end-of-life care is important as misunderstanding can result in under-treatment and unnecessary suffering for the patient and their care providers. Therefore better understanding can improve patient–physician communication and potentially improve patients’ quality of life, coping, and facilitate patients to make informed decisions and set appropriate priorities with regard to treatment and end-of-life care. This chapter discusses key cultural issues in palliative care, including the concepts of nondisclosure, the importance of the use of a medical interpreter, and the importance of an interdisciplinary team.


2017 ◽  
Vol 36 (4) ◽  
pp. 264-270 ◽  
Author(s):  
Renea L. Beckstrand ◽  
Kacie Hart Hadley ◽  
Karlen E. Luthy ◽  
Janelle L. B. Macintosh

2000 ◽  
Vol 16 (1_suppl) ◽  
pp. S17-S23 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kerry W. Bowman

In recent years, it has become possible for the end of life to be a negotiated event, particularly in the intensive care unit. A multitude of often unidentified and poorly understood factors affect such negotiations. These include, family dynamics, ever-changing health care teams, inconsistent opinions about prognosis, and cultural differences between physicians, and patients and their families. When these factors converge, conflict may erupt. This article explores the nature, antecedents, and cost of such conflict. Arguments for the importance of balanced communication, negotiation, and mediation in end-of-life care are put forward.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document