scholarly journals MP35-17 DESCRIBING UROLOGY RESIDENCY SURGICAL CASE VOLUME OVER TIME: A REVIEW OF THE ACGME RESIDENT CASE LOGS

2019 ◽  
Vol 201 (Supplement 4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jonathan Wingate* ◽  
Byron Joyner ◽  
Judith Hagedorn ◽  
Niels Johnsen
2018 ◽  
Vol 75 (4) ◽  
pp. 1052-1057 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kanu Okike ◽  
Peter Z. Berger ◽  
Carrie Schoonover ◽  
Robert V. O′Toole

2017 ◽  
Vol 10 (6) ◽  
pp. 531-537 ◽  
Author(s):  
Steven F. DeFroda ◽  
Joseph A. Gil ◽  
Brad D. Blankenhorn ◽  
Alan H. Daniels

Surgical case volume during orthopaedic surgical residency is a concern among trainees and program directors alike. With an ongoing trend toward further subspecialization and the rapid development of new techniques and devices, the breadth of procedures that residents are exposed to continues to increase. Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education surgical case logs from 2009 to 2013 for graduating orthopaedic surgery residents were examined to assess the national averages of orthopaedic procedures logged by graduating orthopaedic surgery residents in the leg/ankle and foot/toes categories. This investigation revealed that there was an 8% increase in the total number of leg/ankle cases and 12% increase in foot/toes cases performed by graduating orthopaedic surgery residents, which has not significantly increased from 2009 to 2013. Across years examined in this study, significant variability existed between the 10th and 90th percentiles for total foot and ankle resident case exposure (P < .05), particularly within ankle arthroscopy, where there was a 15-fold difference in the number of arthroscopy cases performed by residents in the 90th percentile compared with the 10th percentile. The overall volume of foot and ankle cases performed by graduating orthopaedic surgery residents has increased despite not being statistically significantly from 2009 to 2013. Levels of Evidence: Level III: Cohort study


2014 ◽  
Vol 8 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 36 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nathan A Hoag ◽  
Ryan Flannigan ◽  
Andrew E MacNeily

Introduction: The introduction and advancement of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) has resulted in a reciprocal decline in exposure to open surgery during urology residency training. We propose organ procurement surgery as a potential vehicle to facilitate an increase in open surgical experience among trainees. We define the surgical case volume for organ procurement surgeries currently performed by urology residents in Canada, and determine what capacity exists for expansion.Methods: Data on organ procurement surgeries were extracted for Canadian urology residents case-logs between 2005 and 2009. Case-logs were anonymously analyzed through the voluntary self-reporting program T-Res (Resilience Software Inc.). National deceased organ donor data were obtained from the Canadian Institute for Health Information.Results: The graduating Canadian urology resident has performed an average of 0.95 organ procurement surgeries during 5 years of training. An average of 469.6 procurement surgeries were performed yearly in Canada between 2005 and 2009. The theoretical capacity exists for each graduating resident to perform an additional 16.3 organ procurements during residency.Conclusions: With the establishment of MIS as standard of care for many urologic surgeries, the decrease in open operative experience is concerning. Innovative ways to enrich open surgical experience may be required, and increased formal incorporation of organ procurements into urology residency training curriculum may help fill the void. 


2011 ◽  
Vol 25 (6) ◽  
pp. 1063-1067 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adiel E. Mamut ◽  
Kourosh Afshar ◽  
Jennifer J. Mickelson ◽  
Andrew E. MacNeily

2005 ◽  
Vol 129 (4) ◽  
pp. 754-759 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul A. Checchia ◽  
Jamie McCollegan ◽  
Noha Daher ◽  
Nikoleta Kolovos ◽  
Fiona Levy ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Claire B. Cummins ◽  
Kanika A. Bowen-Jallow ◽  
Sifrance Tran ◽  
Ravi S. Radhakrishnan

2016 ◽  
Vol 223 (4) ◽  
pp. e128-e129
Author(s):  
Jason B. Brill ◽  
James D. Wallace ◽  
Paul R. Lewis ◽  
Jonathan H. Berger ◽  
Marion Henry ◽  
...  

2004 ◽  
Vol 43 (5) ◽  
pp. A395 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul A Checchia ◽  
Jamie McCollegen ◽  
Nikoleta Kolovos ◽  
Fiona Levy ◽  
Barry Markovitz

2021 ◽  
pp. postgradmedj-2021-140503
Author(s):  
Faiz Tuma ◽  
Rafael D Malgor ◽  
Nikit Kapila ◽  
Mohamed K Kamel

IntroductionGeneral surgery residency involves performing subspecialty procedures in addition to the core general procedures. However, the proportion of core general surgery versus subspecialty procedures during training is variable and its temporal changes are unknown. The goal of our study was to assess the current trends in core general surgery and subspecialty procedure distributions during general surgery residency training.MethodsData were collected from the ACGME core general surgery national resident available report case logs from 2007 to 2019. Descriptive and time series analyses were used to compare proportions of average procedures performed per resident in the core general surgery category versus the subspecialty category. F-tests were conducted to show whether the slopes of the trend lines were significantly non-zero.ResultsThe mean of total procedures completed for major credit by the average general surgery resident increased from 910.1 (SD=30.31) in 2007 to 1070.5 (SD=37.59) in 2019. Over that same period, the number of general, cardiothoracic, plastic and urology surgery procedures increased by 24.9%, 9.8%, 76.6% and 19.3%, respectively. Conversely, vascular and paediatric surgery procedures decreased by 7.6% and 30.7%, respectively. The neurological surgery procedures remain stable at 1.1 procedures per resident per year. A significant positive correlation in the trend reflecting total (p<0.0001), general (p<0.0001) and plastic (p<0.0016) surgery procedures and the negative correlation in the trend lines for vascular (p<0.0006) and paediatric (p<0.0001) surgery procedures were also noted.ConclusionsTrends in overall surgical case volume performed by general surgery residents over the last 12 years have shown a steady increase in operative training opportunity despite the increasing number of subspecialty training programmes and fellowships. Further research to identify areas for improvement and to study the diversity of operative procedures, and their outcomes is warranted in the years to come.


Author(s):  
Rahul Kumar ◽  
David S Hersh ◽  
Luke G. F Smith ◽  
William E Gordon ◽  
Nickalus R Khan ◽  
...  

OBJECTIVE Neurosurgical residents receive exposure to the subspecialty of pediatric neurosurgery during training. The authors sought to determine resident operative experience in pediatric neurosurgery across Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME)–accredited neurosurgical programs. METHODS During 2018–2019, pediatric neurosurgical case logs for recent graduates or current residents who completed their primary pediatric exposure were collected from US continental ACGME training programs. Using individual resident reports and procedure designations, operative volumes and case diversity were analyzed collectively, according to training site characteristics, and also correlated with the recently described Resident Experience Score (RES). RESULTS Of the 114 programs, a total of 316 resident case logs (range 1–19 residents per program) were received from 86 (75%) programs. The median cumulative pediatric case volume per resident was 109 (IQR 75–161). Residents at programs with a pediatric fellowship reported a higher median case volume (143, IQR 96–187) than residents at programs without (91, IQR 66–129; p < 0.0001). Residents at programs that outsource their pediatric rotation had a lower median case volume (84, IQR 52–114) compared with those at programs with an in-house experience (117, IQR 79–170; p < 0.0001). The case diversity index among all programs ranged from 0.61 to 0.80, with no statistically significant differences according to the Accreditation Council for Pediatric Neurosurgery Fellowships designation or pediatric experience site (p > 0.05). The RES correlated moderately (r = 0.44) with median operative volumes per program. A program’s annual pediatric operative volume and duration of pediatric experience were identified as significant predictive factors for median resident operative volume. CONCLUSIONS Resident experience in pediatric neurosurgery is variable within and between programs. Case volumes are generally higher for residents at programs with in-house exposure and an accredited fellowship, but case diversity is relatively uniform across all programs. RES provides some insight on anticipated case volume, but other unexplained factors remain.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document