Do Orthopaedic Residency Programs Have the Least Time Between Invitation and Interview?

ABSTRACT Background The cost and stress of applying to residency programs are increasing. Planning for interviews with limited lead time can cause additional burden to residency applicants. Objective We sought to determine if the specialty of orthopaedics was affording the same lead time between interview invitation and interview dates as its surgical and medical counterparts. Methods Dates for the first interview invitation and last possible interview were gathered for each program in orthopaedic surgery, general surgery, otolaryngology, vascular surgery, plastic surgery, neurological surgery, internal medicine, psychiatry, pediatrics, and family medicine. Interview lead time was calculated for each specialty. Mann–Whitney U and independent sample Kruskal-Wallis tests were used for nonparametric data with P < .05 considered as significant. Results Orthopaedic surgery lead time is significantly different when compared individually and pairwise to other specialties (P < .05 for all comparisons), with a median lead time of 57 days. The next lowest lead time specialty is otolaryngology with a 70-day lead time. The specialty with the longest is pediatrics (median 106 days). Conclusions Residency programs (orthopaedic surgery in particular) vary widely in the amount of lead time given to schedule and attend interviews. The authors propose that interview invitations be extended into mid-October.

Orthopaedic Residency Program Website Content and Accessibility During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Observational Study (Preprint)

BACKGROUND The exceptional competitiveness of the orthopaedic surgery specialty, combined with the unclear impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on residency recruitment, has presented significant challenges to applicants and residency program directors.1 With limited in-person opportunities in the 2020-2021 application cycle, applicants have been pressed to gauge chances and best fit by browsing program websites. OBJECTIVE The objective of the study was to assess the accessibility and content of accredited orthopaedic surgery residency program websites during the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS Using the online database of the Electronic Residency Application Series (ERAS), we compiled a list of accredited orthopaedic residency programs in the United States. Program websites were evaluated across four domains: program overview, education, research opportunities, and application details. Each website was assessed twice in July, during a period of adjustment to the COVID-19 pandemic, and twice in November, following the October ERAS application deadline. RESULTS 189 accredited orthopaedic surgery residency programs were identified through ERAS. Three programs did not have a website and were not evaluated for content. Data analysis of content in each domain revealed that most websites included program details, a description of the didactic curriculum, and sample rotation schedules. Between the two evaluation periods in July and November, the percentage of program websites containing informative videos and virtual tours rose from 12% to 48% and 1% to 13%, respectively (p<0.005). However, the number of programs that included information about a virtual sub-internship or virtual interview to their websites did not change. CONCLUSIONS Most residency program websites offered program details and an overview of educational and research opportunities; however, few addressed the virtual transition of interviews and sub-internships during the COVID-19 pandemic.