Re: Trends in the Usage of Contrast Allergy Prophylaxis for Endourologic Procedures

2020 ◽  
Vol 203 (2) ◽  
pp. 228-229
Author(s):  
David S. Wang
Keyword(s):  
2014 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 101-102 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sumeet Gandhi ◽  
Dhanjit Litt ◽  
Mark Chandy ◽  
Bao M. Nguyen ◽  
Nina Lakhani Jindal ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 15 (5) ◽  
pp. 424-426 ◽  
Author(s):  
Patrick E. Casey ◽  
Charles J. Miranda ◽  
Haytham Al-Khaffaf ◽  
Peter M. Woodhead

Author(s):  
Mikin V. Patel ◽  
Steven Zangan

Angiography relies on the use of contrast medium for visualization of the vessel. Iodinated contrast can be contraindicated in patients with renal impairment or iodinated contrast allergy, so carbon dioxide (CO2) gas can be a useful alternative. A number of technical and postural parameters can optimize CO2 angiography, and vasodilators can be used to improve imaging of peripheral vessels. Although CO2 has distinct advantages, the limitations of CO2 angiography must be well understood. Operators should be aware that CO2 angiography can lead to overestimation of vessel size and can lead to complications such as transient ischemia of tissues, alterations of blood chemistry, neurotoxicity, and “vapor lock.”


2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
K Jha ◽  
A Berger ◽  
J Blankenship

Abstract Background Primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) is the best treatment for ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). However, patients with prior contrast reactions may not receive PCI due to concern over a recurrent contrast reaction. Purpose To determine the clinical efficacy of emergency pretreatment regimens for contrast allergy in STEMI patients undergoing PPCI. Methods We retrospectively identified all individuals with a history of contrast allergy who presented with STEMI, were pretreated for contrast allergy, and underwent PPCI at our medical center between January 2005 to May 2018. Emergency pretreatment regimen included a combination of intravenous (IV) steroid, IV famotidine and IV diphenhydramine administered immediately before PCI. Laboratory records, inpatient notes, and discharge summaries were reviewed to confirm the severity of the original contrast allergy and identify any allergic breakthrough reaction after pretreatment with an emergency regimen. Reactions were characterized as mild, moderate, severe, or of unknown severity. Results During the study period 15,712 individuals underwent PCI, of which 176 patients presented with STEMI, had confirmed contrast allergy, and were pretreated before undergoing PCI. No patient with a history of contrast allergy underwent PPCI without pre-treatment. Mean age was 64 years, with 52% males, and all individuals were white. The majority had hypertension (77%), 67% had dyslipidemia, 29% had diabetes mellitus, and 20% patients had a prior history of MI. Intravenous steroids used in the emergency regimen included methylprednisone (n=100), hydrocortisone (n=70), and dexamethasone (n=6). The original allergic response to ICM was mild in 59% patients, moderate in 15%, severe in 20% and of unknown severity in 13% patients. Of the 176 patients only 10 (5.6%) developed a breakthrough reaction. Most of which were mild; none was fatal. Median length of hospital stays was three days and nine patients (10.8%) passed away within 30 days of hospital admission. Conclusions Patients with prior contrast allergy presenting with STEMI can safely undergo PPCI after emergency pretreatment. Breakthrough reactions are infrequent and mild.


2018 ◽  
Vol 59 (3) ◽  
pp. 622-625 ◽  
Author(s):  
Saurav Uppal ◽  
Anthony E. DeCicco ◽  
Anselma Intini ◽  
Richard A. Josephson

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document